Customer Views of Deregulation
In: Strategic planning for energy and the environment, Band 17, Heft 4, S. 51-52
ISSN: 1546-0126
7310 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Strategic planning for energy and the environment, Band 17, Heft 4, S. 51-52
ISSN: 1546-0126
In: Journal of labor research, Band 15, Heft 3, S. 207-234
ISSN: 1936-4768
In: Economic affairs: journal of the Institute of Economic Affairs, Band 14, Heft 4, S. 28-30
ISSN: 1468-0270
The Government is undertaking a range of measures to tackle the burden of excessive red tape on business, This is a continuing programme requiring inputs from both government and business.
In: The Australian economic review, Band 23, Heft 2, S. 80-91
ISSN: 1467-8462
In: Journal of public policy, Band 8, S. 195-212
ISSN: 0143-814X
Conference paper. Political institutions as impediments to change; the state of public and scientific debate.
In: Policy options: Options politiques, Band 9, Heft 1, S. 11-13
ISSN: 0226-5893
In: Policy studies journal: the journal of the Policy Studies Organization, Band 16, Heft 1, S. 134-145
ISSN: 1541-0072
In: Policy studies journal: an international journal of public policy, Band 16, Heft 1, S. 134
ISSN: 0190-292X
In: Politics, Band 5, Heft 2, S. 8-16
ISSN: 1467-9256
In: Congressional quarterly weekly report, Band 38, S. 1665-1666
ISSN: 0010-5910, 1521-5997
In: The Freeman: ideas on liberty, Band 27, S. 368-379
ISSN: 0016-0652, 0445-2259
In: 24 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 685 (2020)
SSRN
In: Public choice, Band 140, Heft 3-4, S. 329-340
ISSN: 0048-5829
In: Journal of broadcasting & electronic media: an official publication of the Broadcast Education Association, Band 33, Heft 3, S. 317-323
ISSN: 1550-6878
In: Journal of policy analysis and management: the journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Band 5, Heft 3, S. 517-534
ISSN: 1520-6688
AbstractThe recent deregulation movement has occupied not only executive agencies and Congress, but the courts as well. Legal challenges to deregulatory measures press traditional doctrines governing judicial review; the traditional role of the courts has been to fend off rather than to help bring about government regulation. These traditions, when joined with contemporary distrust of both regulation and the courts, account for a mounting belief that courts should take a deferential approach to deregulation. But such an approach would be misguided in light of the importance of judicial review in promoting agency adherence to statutes enacted by Congress and in guarding against factional influences over government. Judge‐made doctrines can be developed to make it more likely that deregulation is consistent with law and does not reflect the disproportionate influence of politically powerful groups.