8511 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Geschichte der deutschen Militärmacht 2
In: Militärgeschichtliche Mitteilungen: MGM, Heft 2, S. 574-575
ISSN: 0026-3826
In: Beiträge zur Geschichte Hamburgs 30
In: Hamburger Beiträge zur Zeitgeschichte 6
In: Düsseldorfer Schriften zur neueren Landesgeschichte und zur Geschichte Nordrhein-Westfalens 33
World Affairs Online
In: IWK: internationale wissenschaftliche Korrespondenz zur Geschichte der deutschen Arbeiterbewegung, Band 39, Heft 2, S. 253-255
ISSN: 0046-8428
In: Geschichte der Aufteilung und Kolonisation Afrikas seit dem Zeitalter der Entdeckungen 2
In: The journal of conflict resolution: journal of the Peace Science Society (International), Band 62, Heft 9, S. 1847-1875
ISSN: 1552-8766
There is increasing evidence that territorial conflict is associated with centralized and nondemocratic regimes. We explore whether this relationship is due to the facility of democratic regimes to settle their international borders. Using Owsiak's data set on border settlement processes, we find little evidence that democratic regimes are more likely than other types of regimes to settle their borders. In fact, joint democracy rarely precedes the first border agreement or full settlement of the border, and there is almost no qualitative evidence suggesting a link between democracy and border settlement in the rare instances of successful agreements. Democracies are also not more likely to keep their borders settled or even to be more peaceful during settled-border years. Overall, our findings suggest that border settlements lead to peace in the dyad and affirm a clear temporal sequence of border settlement, then peace and democracy for neighboring dyads.
World Affairs Online
In: The journal of conflict resolution: journal of the Peace Science Society (International), Band 62, Heft 9, S. 1847-1875
ISSN: 1552-8766
There is increasing evidence that territorial conflict is associated with centralized and nondemocratic regimes. We explore whether this relationship is due to the facility of democratic regimes to settle their international borders. Using Owsiak's data set on border settlement processes, we find little evidence that democratic regimes are more likely than other types of regimes to settle their borders. In fact, joint democracy rarely precedes the first border agreement or full settlement of the border, and there is almost no qualitative evidence suggesting a link between democracy and border settlement in the rare instances of successful agreements. Democracies are also not more likely to keep their borders settled or even to be more peaceful during settled-border years. Overall, our findings suggest that border settlements lead to peace in the dyad and affirm a clear temporal sequence of border settlement, then peace and democracy for neighboring dyads.
In: International affairs, Band 39, Heft 2, S. 289-289
ISSN: 1468-2346