Décadence et absolutisme dans l'œuvre de Montesquieu
In: Études d'histoire économique, politique et sociale 34
26721 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Études d'histoire économique, politique et sociale 34
In: Asian journal of social science, Band 36, Heft 1, S. 136-137
ISSN: 2212-3857
In: Actuel Marx, Heft 39, S. 167-172
ISSN: 0994-4524
In: University of Miami Law Review, Band 60, S. 309
SSRN
In: American anthropologist: AA, Band 71, Heft 3, S. 572-572
ISSN: 1548-1433
In: American Slavic and East European Review, Band 8, Heft 2, S. 77
In: A history of diplomacy in the international development of Europe 3
In: The SAIS review of international affairs / the Johns Hopkins University, the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), Band 30, Heft 1, S. 39-55
ISSN: 1945-4724
In: The SAIS review of international affairs / the Johns Hopkins University, the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), Band 30, Heft 1, S. 39-55
ISSN: 1945-4716
World Affairs Online
In: SAIS review, Band 30, Heft 1, S. 39-56
In: SAIS Review, Band 30, Heft 1, S. 39-55
The contested 2009 presidential elections revealed deep divisions among Iran's ruling elite at a political and clerical level, calling into question what a society governed by jurists and Islamic law truly means. As the leadership attempts to maintain its tenuous hold on power while suppressing a popular reformist movement, the question remains: How to resolve the tension between divine law and popular will? What does it mean to be a conservative in a country where both the right and the left are committed to an Islamic government? The new reformist movement in Iran reveals the unresolved tensions that exist in a theocracy, the contradictions between faith, modernity and democracy. Conservatives have used their commitment to Khomeinism to consolidate their hold on power, but without Ayatollah Khomeini's unifying presence, what it means to mix religion and politics is no longer clear, as both conservatives and reformists claim Khomeini's legacy. Adapted from the source document.
In: SAIS Review, Band 30, Heft 1
The contested 2009 presidential elections revealed deep divisions among Iran's ruling elite at a political and clerical level, calling into question what a society governed by jurists and Islamic law truly means. As the leadership attempts to maintain its tenuous hold on power while suppressing a popular reformist movement, the question remains: How to resolve the tension between divine law and popular will? What does it mean to be a conservative in a country where both the right and the left are committed to an Islamic government? The new reformist movement in Iran reveals the unresolved tensions that exist in a theocracy, the contradictions between faith, modernity and democracy. Conservatives have used their commitment to Khomeinism to consolidate their hold on power, but without Ayatollah Khomeini's unifying presence, what it means to mix religion and politics is no longer clear, as both conservatives and reformists claim Khomeini's legacy. Adapted from the source document.
In: Human Rights Quarterly, Band 15, Heft 2, S. 315