Strategic Voting in Open Primaries
In: Public Choice, Band 112, Heft 1/2, S. 1-30
2813 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Public Choice, Band 112, Heft 1/2, S. 1-30
In: Public choice, Band 112, Heft 1-2, S. 1-30
ISSN: 0048-5829
The purpose of an open primary is to incorporate more moderate votes into the primary elections. This intention may backfire when nonparty members strategically participate in the primary, & the result of an open primary might become even more extreme than when nonparty members are not allowed to participate. Realizing this, the party members might also vote strategically to counter-react. If this occurs, then it might actually coordinate the votes of the party's supporters. The effect of strategic voting behavior on the result of a primary depends on the size of the party, turnout rate of nonparty members, the positions of the candidates & the proportion of voters who vote strategically. Strategic voting behavior can sometimes improve social welfare. 1 Appendix, 22 References. Adapted from the source document.
In: Public choice, Band 112, Heft 1, S. 1-30
ISSN: 0048-5829
In: The new leader: a biweekly of news and opinion, Band 55, S. 9-11
ISSN: 0028-6044
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 71, Heft 4, S. 1467-1480
ISSN: 0022-3816
In: Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science in the City of New York, Band 3, Heft 2, S. 181
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 71, Heft 4, S. 1467-1480
ISSN: 1468-2508
In: American political science review, Band 10, S. 120-123
ISSN: 0003-0554
Reviews the reports of the investigating committees in Massachusetts and Nebraska.
In: Congressional quarterly weekly report, Band 22, S. 92-100
ISSN: 0010-5910, 1521-5997
In: American politics quarterly, Band 19, Heft 1, S. 33
ISSN: 0044-7803
In: Presidential studies quarterly, Band 7, S. 47-48
ISSN: 0360-4918
In: The Western political quarterly: official journal of Western Political Science Association, Band 44, S. 640-655
ISSN: 0043-4078
Predictors of voting in low turnout, low stimulus elections; based on survey taken in 16 "super Tuesday" primary states, 1988.
The new presidential election cycle brings with it both a sense of hope for the future and cause for frustration over bad behavior in an increasingly hostile political environment. As primary candidates emerge, it's worth pausing for reflection on what appropriate behavior during the primary season and beyond looks like.
BASE
In: American politics quarterly, Band 19, S. 33-42
ISSN: 0044-7803
Compares newspaper coverage of state delegate selection events; 1984 and 1988 US presidential nominations. The number of national convention delegates at stake, method of delegate selection, sequence of events, number of same-day events, and the closeness of the race.
This is a study of Kentucky political parties: how they are organized and how they nominate and elect candidates. Because state politics in Kentucky is dominated by the Democratic Party, a major portion of the study is devoted to the Democratic primary candidates, campaign techniques, funding, of elections, and voting patterns.As in other slates, campaign techniques in Kentucky are changing. During the 1950s and 1960s the Democratic Party had two dominant factions, and candidates for statewide office sought factional allies among local party organizations. Now factional alignments have disappe