Society, steward or security actor?: Three visions of the Arctic Council
In: Cooperation and conflict: journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, Band 51, Heft 1, S. 55-74
ISSN: 0010-8367
825 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Cooperation and conflict: journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, Band 51, Heft 1, S. 55-74
ISSN: 0010-8367
World Affairs Online
In: International studies perspectives: ISP, Band 19, Heft 1, S. 83-101
ISSN: 1528-3585
In: Canadian journal of political science: CJPS = Revue canadienne de science politique, Band 54, Heft 1, S. 245-246
ISSN: 1744-9324
In: Naučno-analitičeskij vestnik Instituta Evropy RAN, Band 1, Heft 2, S. 194-200
ISSN: 2618-7914
In: International Organisations Research Journal, Band 13, Heft 1, S. 66-79
ISSN: 2542-2081
In: Cooperation and conflict: journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, Band 52, Heft 2, S. 203-223
ISSN: 1460-3691
Contemporary Arctic transformations and their global causes and consequences have put international cooperation in the Arctic Council, the region's most important forum for addressing Arctic affairs, at the forefront of research in Northern governance. With interest in Arctic regional affairs in world politics being at a historical high, the actual participation and contribution by interested actors to regional governance arrangements, such as the Arctic Council, has remained very much a blind spot. This article introduces and analyses a novel dataset on stakeholder participation in the Arctic Council (STAPAC) for all member states, Permanent Participants and observers in Ministerial, Senior Arctic Officials' and subsidiary body meetings between 1998 and 2015. The article finds that participation in the Arctic Council varies significantly across meeting levels and type of actors, and that new admissions to the Council, a source of major contestation in recent debates, do not necessarily result in more actors attending. The article further discusses these findings in light of three prevalent debates in Arctic governance research, and shows the empirical relevance of the STAPAC dataset for the study of Arctic cooperation and conflict, observer involvement in the Arctic Council system and political representation of indigenous Permanent Participants.
World Affairs Online
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 113, Heft 4, S. 831-833
ISSN: 2161-7953
The Arctic Council convened for the eleventh time in early May 2019 in Rovaniemi, Finland, for a two-day conference. On May 7, the Arctic Council released a Joint Ministerial Statement that affirmed the desire of the eight member states to work together to face upcoming challenges but made no substantive commitments and no mention of climate change. In remarks to the Council, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo expressed wariness about collective decision making and warned against potential effects of Chinese activity in the Arctic.
In: Sirius: Zeitschrift für strategische Analysen, Band 1, Heft 2, S. 212-213
ISSN: 2510-2648
In: International journal / CIC, Canadian International Council: ij ; Canada's journal of global policy analysis, Band 72, Heft 2, S. 285-287
In: Cooperation and conflict: journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, Band 52, Heft 2, S. 203-223
ISSN: 1460-3691
Contemporary Arctic transformations and their global causes and consequences have put international cooperation in the Arctic Council, the region's most important forum for addressing Arctic affairs, at the forefront of research in Northern governance. With interest in Arctic regional affairs in world politics being at a historical high, the actual participation and contribution by interested actors to regional governance arrangements, such as the Arctic Council, has remained very much a blind spot. This article introduces and analyses a novel dataset on stakeholder participation in the Arctic Council (STAPAC) for all member states, Permanent Participants and observers in Ministerial, Senior Arctic Officials' and subsidiary body meetings between 1998 and 2015. The article finds that participation in the Arctic Council varies significantly across meeting levels and type of actors, and that new admissions to the Council, a source of major contestation in recent debates, do not necessarily result in more actors attending. The article further discusses these findings in light of three prevalent debates in Arctic governance research, and shows the empirical relevance of the STAPAC dataset for the study of Arctic cooperation and conflict, observer involvement in the Arctic Council system and political representation of indigenous Permanent Participants.
In: Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, Band 30, Heft 131
SSRN
SWP
In: Journal of borderlands studies, Band 33, Heft 2, S. 225-238
ISSN: 2159-1229
In: Climate Governance in the Arctic; Environment & Policy, S. 383-402
In: Russian analytical digest: (RAD), Band 269, S. 5-7
ISSN: 1863-0421
World Affairs Online