Urban Sustainability During Industrialization: The Case of China
In: Bulletin of science, technology & society, Band 13, Heft 6, S. 324-331
ISSN: 1552-4183
82 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Bulletin of science, technology & society, Band 13, Heft 6, S. 324-331
ISSN: 1552-4183
In: Center for Energy & Environmental Policy Technical Report, 2020
SSRN
In: Strüngmann Forum Reports
A multidisciplinary examination of alternative framings of environmental problems, with using examples from forest, water, energy, and urban sectors. Does being an environmentalist mean caring about wild nature Or is environmentalism synonymous with concern for future human well-being, or about a fair apportionment of access to the earth's resources and a fair sharing of pollution burdens Environmental problems are undoubtedly one of the most salient public issues of our time, yet environmental scholarship and action is marked by a fragmentation of ideas and approaches because of the multiple ways in which these environmental problems are "framed." Diverse framings prioritize different values and explain problems in various ways, thereby suggesting different solutions. Are more inclusive framings possible Will this enable more socially relevant, impactful research and more concerted action and practice This book takes a multidisciplinary look at these questions using examples from forest, water, energy, and urban sectors. It explores how different forms of environmentalism are shaped by different normative and theoretical positions, and attempts to bridge these divides. Individual perspectives are complemented by comprehensive syntheses of the differing framings in each sector. By self-reflectively exploring how researchers study and mobilize evidence about environmental problems, the book opens up the possibility of alternative framings to advance collaborative and integrated understanding of environmental problems and sustainability challenges.
In: University of Delaware, Center for Energy & Environmental Policy, Final Report, May 2017
SSRN
SSRN
Working paper
In: Bulletin of science, technology & society, Band 22, Heft 2, S. 110-122
ISSN: 1552-4183
An energy efficiency scenario (Joint Institute for a Sustainable Energy and Environmental Future) demonstrates that an energy future built on the use of cost-effective, high-efficiency technologies is clearly within the grasp of South Korea and would justify a nuclear power moratorium with significantly lower carbon dioxide emissions. This is a promising result, especially because applications of other sustainable energy options, such as renewables, decentralized technologies, material recycling/reuse, ecologically based land use planning, forest conservation, sustainable agriculture, and redirection of economic development toward an environment-friendly industrial base, are not included in the analysis. Here lies one of the most fundamental policy choices of the newcentury: Will we build a sustainable energy and environmental future, or will we send forward the burdens and risks of a policy regime that is unwilling to value the future beyond the satisfaction of short-term interests and convenience? It is a critical time for South Korean policy making.
In: Pacific affairs, Band 77, Heft 3, S. 403-542
ISSN: 0030-851X
Williams, James H. ; Dubash, Navroz K.: Introduction
World Affairs Online