The Optimal Quantity of CBDC in a Bank-Based Economy
In: ECB Working Paper No. 2022/2689
89 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: ECB Working Paper No. 2022/2689
SSRN
In: CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP16995
SSRN
In: ECB Working Paper No. 2349
SSRN
In: CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP14288
SSRN
Working paper
In: FRB Atlanta Working Paper No. 2004-37
SSRN
In: ECB Occasional Paper No. 2021280
SSRN
In: ECB Occasional Paper No. 2021279
SSRN
In: Economic policy, Band 28, Heft 74, S. 243-288
ISSN: 1468-0327
In: ECB Working Paper No. 1336
SSRN
Bayesian dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models combine microeconomic behavioural foundations with a full-system Bayesian likelihood estimation approach using key macro-economic variables. Because of the usefulness of this class of models for addressing questions regarding the impact and consequences of alternative monetary policies they are nowadays widely used for forecasting and policy analysis at central banks and other institutions. In this paper we provide a brief description of the two main aggregate euro area models at the ECB. Both models share a common core but their detailed specification differs reflecting their specific focus and use. The New Area Wide Model (NAWM) has a more elaborate international block, which is useful for conditioning the euro area projections on assumptions about foreign economic activity, prices and interest rates and to widen the scope for scenario analysis. The Christiano, Motto and Rostagno (CMR) model instead has a more developed financial sector, which allows it to be used for monetary and financial scenarios and for cross checking. Based on the comparison of two models we find a broad agreement on the qualitative predictions they make, although, in quantitative terms, there are some differences. However, the perspectives provided by the two models are often complementary, rather than conflicting.
BASE
In: Bank of Greece Working Paper No. 129
SSRN
This paper uses information from a rich firm-level survey on wage and price-setting procedures, in around 15,000 firms in 15 European Union countries, to investigate the relative importance of internal versus external factors in the setting of wages of newly hired workers. The evidence suggests that external labour market conditions are less important than internal pay structures in determining hiring pay, with internal pay structures binding even more often when there is labour market slack. When explaining their choice firms allude to fairness considerations and the need to prevent a potential negative impact on effort. Despite the lower importance of external factors in all countries there is significant cross-country variation in this respect. Cross-country differences are found to depend on institutional factors (bargaining structures); countries in which collective agreements are more prevalent and collective agreement coverage is higher report to a greater extent internal pay structures as the main determinant of hiring pay. Within-country differences are found to depend on firm and workforce characteristics; there is a strong association between the use of external factors in hiring pay, on the one hand, and skills (positive) and tenure (negative) on the other.
BASE
In: ECB Working Paper No. 1153
SSRN