The Logic of the Developmental State
In: Comparative politics, Band 24, Heft 1, S. 109
ISSN: 0010-4159
6231 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Comparative politics, Band 24, Heft 1, S. 109
ISSN: 0010-4159
In: Democracy, Development and Discontent in South Asia, S. 148-170
In: Routledge Handbook of Asian Regionalism
In: Dictators, Democrats, and Development in Southeast Asia, S. 204-248
In: Asian survey, Band 39, Heft 2, S. 214-242
ISSN: 1533-838X
In: Third world quarterly, Band 17, Heft 4, S. 689-706
ISSN: 1360-2241
In: Journal of Asian and African studies: JAAS, Band 25, Heft Jan-Apr 90
ISSN: 0021-9096
In: Journal of Asian and African studies: JAAS, Band 25, Heft 1-2, S. 60-70
ISSN: 0021-9096
In: African and Asian Studies, Band 25, Heft 1, S. 60-70
ISSN: 1569-2108
In: Journal of Asian and African studies: JAAS, Band 25, Heft 1-2, S. 60-70
ISSN: 1745-2538
In: ESID Working Paper No. 03, February 2012
SSRN
Working paper
In: Africa insight: development through knowledge, Band 43, Heft 2, S. 1
ISSN: 0256-2804
In: Global networks: a journal of transnational affairs, Band 11, Heft 3, S. 298-314
ISSN: 1471-0374
AbstractIn this article we examine the role of the Chinese government in fostering advances in nanotechnology, while looking at the promises and pitfalls of state‐led development in the world's fastest‐growing major economy. China, like many countries involved in catch‐up development, is convinced that manufacturing prowess alone is not enough to make it a leading economic power in the twenty‐first century. Our concern here is how, within the context of nanotechnology, China's approach to national development reflects the debate on innovation. Many countries, including the United States, see government spending on nanotechnology as essential to creating world leadership in this emerging field. The USA, for example, expects to spend $1.8 billion in 2011 on its National Nanotechnology Initiative – primarily to foster basic research and development. Unlike the USA, government sources largely fund nanotechnology in China, for its economy is in transition from state‐owned to privately‐owned enterprises and still suffers from a lack of private investment capital. Moreover, in China, such funding extends more broadly across the value chain than in the United States, from fundamental research to commercialization. Through field research and extensive interviews, in this article we document and evaluate the effectiveness of China's state‐led efforts to become a global nanotech leader.
In: Papers in the Politics of Global Competitiveness No. 4
SSRN
Working paper
In: Management and Organization Review, Band 3, Heft 1, S. 19-53
SSRN