Social security policy in Japan
In: International labour review, Band 84, S. 292-301
ISSN: 0020-7780
96159 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International labour review, Band 84, S. 292-301
ISSN: 0020-7780
In 1995 Finland joined the European Union (EU). This action culminated several years of a fundamental reorientation of Finnish security policy as Finland moved from the neutrality imposed on it by the Soviet Union to a policy with a priority on European integration through the European Union. Finland, in joining the EU, has retained its independent defense and security posture, even as it seeks to strengthen its standing abroad and gain added leverage, through the EU, for dealing with Russia. Finland's odyssey indicates much about two fundamental issues in European security: coping with Russia's crises, and the interrelationship between the EU and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as providers of security for small states in Europe. Furthermore, Finland's proximity to Russia and the difficult history of Fenno-Russian relations have imposed on Finnish policymakers the need for penetrating and sober analysis of Finland's and Europe's security situation. Therefore, Finland's evolution from an imposed neutrality to overt participation in European integration merits our careful scrutiny and attention. ; https://press.armywarcollege.edu/monographs/1872/thumbnail.jpg
BASE
In: Icelandic Review of Politics and Administration: IRPA = Stjórnmál og stjórnsýsla, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 1-16
ISSN: 1670-679X
Iceland has been slow in developing a national security concept, for reasons that include a long period of reliance on US protection post-World War Two, and divided internal views over this defence solution. Since the withdrawal of all US stationed forces in 2006, Iceland's security partnerships have diversified and attempts have been made to frame security in more multi-functional terms. The Risk Assessment Report of 2009 made important progress in itemizing non-military threats and risks. On this basis, a cross-party parliamentary committee was invited to start work in 2012 on guidelines for a security strategy. Its report, published in March 2014, establishes a large area of consensus on 'softer' security issues and on remaining in NATO, with a few dissenting voices on the latter. Its main omission is a proper treatment of economic and financial security, still tied to the divisive issue of EU membership. Meanwhile, Iceland's recent security experience in 2014 has helped to highlight the reality of both harder and softer security challenges. The government can now proceed to draft a full official security strategy, to be laid before parliament possibly in 2015.
In: Understanding EU Decision-Making, S. 111-124
In: Developments in American Politics 7, S. 244-262
In: India quarterly: a journal of international affairs, Band 64, Heft 3, S. 1-27
ISSN: 0975-2684
In: Europäische Sicherheit: Politik, Streitkräfte, Wirtschaft, Technik, Band 48, Heft 1, S. 49
ISSN: 0940-4171
In: Europäische Sicherheit: Politik, Streitkräfte, Wirtschaft, Technik, Band 46, Heft 3, S. 46-47
ISSN: 0940-4171
In: The national interest, Heft 37, S. 92
ISSN: 0884-9382
In: Aussenpolitik. English edition : German foreign affairs review, Band 44, Heft 4, S. 335-343
ISSN: 0587-3835
In: Arms Control, Band 8, Heft 1, S. 80-94
In: Foreign affairs: an American quarterly review, Band 63, Heft 5, S. 1009
ISSN: 2327-7793
In: India quarterly: a journal of international affairs ; IQ, Band 64, Heft 3, S. 1-27
ISSN: 0019-4220, 0974-9284
World Affairs Online
In: The Adelphi Papers, Band 33, Heft 277, S. 3-5