Suchergebnisse

VAT is an indirect tax paid by the subscriber in accordance with the purchase - the sales net. In the European Union the VAT system is strictly regulated, because this tax has a significant influence over the development of the EU's single market and production by ensuring adequate competitiveness. The main document regulating the sale of production, including agricultural and food products, the VAT regime across the EU is 2006, dated 28 November the European Council Directive 2006/112/EB on the common value added tax system. This Directive regulates practically all aspects of the application of VAT. In addition to this threshold, there are still some of the European Council and European Commission directives on the specific application of VAT to the hearings. Lithuania VAT introduced in 1994, at 1 day, entry into force of the Republic of Lithuania Law on value added tax Nr. I - 3455 which operated until 2002 30 June. Since 2002, entered into force on 1 July the new version of the VAT Act. Latest version of the Law 2008 of December 18 and 23 days of the year 2009, June 26 at substantially changed the standard VAT rate and abolished the former VAT exemptions.EU single market, with free movement of goods, the flat agricultural commodity prices, the growing influence of neighbouring countries have a comparative advantage. Realizable at the same price, indirectly, the Polish producers processors a competitive advantage on reduced VAT rates as compared to Lithuania the producers, processors. In addition, the zloty exchange rate fall in a competitive advantage over Lithuanian food products has increased (example: the price 100Lt/kg, Lithuanian producer - processor, realized the product remains 69Lt/kg, while Poland - 100Lt/kg, it is more 45proc). The 5 or 9 per cent rate of VAT is practically the price difference becomes a zloty exchange rate fluctuation. Value added tax increase had a negative impact on Lithuanian and vegetable sector. Trading company, with its significant market power, the VAT increase on to the shoulders ...

This article examines an aspect of Ghana's political economy in the 1990s,
covering its transition to democracy from military dictatorship, and how this
change process impacted on its attempt to implement a value added tax
(VAT). It assesses the claim that political transition from autocracy to
democracy improves policy-making and policy outcomes. Ghana's experience of
implementing VAT typifies an inherent problem in African governance,
that of lack of adequate capacity for improved policy-making and for
the institutionalisation of inclusive politics and public accountability. The
VAT case served in the end to impose a previously absent level of public
accountability on the Ghanaian government.

Unincorporated enterprises often bypass formal regulations in general and taxation in particular. Bringing unincorporated enterprises under the taxation system is a challenge often faced by tax administrators, and it is in this regard that the present study explores the factors which influence the decision of unincorporated enterprises to register with the state value added tax (VAT)/sales tax authority across states in India. This analysis is limited to the decision regarding registration. It is not necessary that enterprises that are registered pay taxes and/or file returns—however, the process of registration does provide some information to the tax department for follow ups. The study throws up some interesting results for policymakers and tax administrators. JEL Classification: H25, H32, H26, L53

This paper examines the impact of the introduction of the value-added tax on inequality and government revenues using newly released macro data. We present both conventional country fixed effect regressions and instrumental variable analyses, where VAT adoption is instrumented using the previous values of neighbouring countries' VAT systems as an instrument. The results reveal – in contrast to earlier work – that the revenue consequences of the VAT have not been positive. The results indicate that income-based inequality has increased due to the VAT adoption, whereas consumption inequality has remained unaffected. ; Peer reviewed

This paper explores the implications of a distinctive feature of the value added tax (VAT) that is stressed by practitioners but essentially ignored by theorists: that it functions, in part, as a tax on the purchases of informal operators from formal sector businesses and, not least, on their imports. It stresses too the potential importance of the creditable withholding taxes that are levied by many developing countries-which have also been ignored. If both of these instruments are optimally deployed, it is shown, then the usual prescription that a small economy should not deploy tariffs rema

The last note1on this subject recorded that the Commission's proposals for the definitive VAT system (initially envisaged to be presented before 31 December 1994) were still awaited.

Value Added Tax (VAT) has become an integral part of domestic tax reforms in many developing countries. Taking the case of Nepal, VAT associates a number of refunds to different private sector activities for promoting investment in higher growth and export potential sectors. Total refund, more specifically, export refund has a significant positive impact on the level of GDP. Furthermore, non-agricultural GDP has strong positive influence to VAT C-efficiency ratio. Likewise, higher the VAT gap, lower is the C-efficiency ratio. If C-efficiency is improved coupled with higher compliance, the capability of the government is strengthened in domestic revenue generation.

Income inequality is a growing concern for regulators because it brings adverse consequences towards social stability, institutional stability and economic performance. One of the popular ways to reduce income inequality is through the implementation of Value Added Tax (VAT) despite of many criticisms on its regressive nature. Hence, using a wide data range from 1984 to 2014, we study the impact of VAT on income inequality in both developed and developing countries. Besides, this is the first study that seeks to focus on the moderating role of country governance in enhancing the effect of VAT on income inequality. We use the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) to overcome the endogeneity, autocorrelation and heteroscedasticity issues. The results suggest that the VAT reduces income inequality but the positive effect is contingent upon the existence of a set of good country governance. Countries that have higher quality of bureaucracy, greater democratic accountability, high government stability, effective law and order, low political risk and favourable socioeconomic conditions stand to benefit more from the VAT system in terms of narrowing the income inequality. Therefore, we conclude that better institutions improve the tax collection and public service delivery, which is a crucial element in achieving the economic objective of narrowing the income gap between the wealthy and the poor. This is particularly true in developing countries. Further, the governments in developing countries need to effectively manage the degree of socioeconomic pressure that could distract them from implementing social and economic policies to eradicate poverty and raise the income level of the poor segment of society.

The increase in electronic trading transactions, both through market places and trade transactions with goods and services originating from abroad, poses its own challenges in tax collection. Trading through the Electronic System (PMSE) on intangible taxable goods and taxable services originating from outside the customs area and utilized within the customs area has been regulated by the government. However, the administration of VAT collection carried out is still conventional by providing collection obligations to overseas entrepreneurs who have exceeded significant trade limits in Indonesia. With the use of Virtual Private Network (VPN) facilities, it is as if the consumer of goods or services in Indonesia is someone who resides or consumes his goods in another country. By means of a simulation, this research shows that with this VPN the potential for digital VAT receipts from Indonesia will be lost and/or the VAT receipts will appear as if they were receipts from other countries' digital taxes.

Revenue mobilization is a key constraint to economic development in the Republic of Guinea. The government's five-year development plan (2016-2020) aims at fostering higher and more inclusive growth through public investments that require financing beyond current fiscal capacity. In this context, Guinea is seeking to efficiently raise additional domestic revenues and external investment financing. Development partners are supporting Guinea with technical assistance for revenue mobilization. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the European Union are supporting authorities with direct tax policy, non-tax revenue, and administration issues. The objective of this report is to shed light on indirect taxes, particularly value-added tax (VAT) and excise taxes. The report provides an overview of the main features of tax policy and administration in Guinea, followed by a more detailed analysis of VAT and excise taxes. The focus on indirect taxation is a result of both its significant revenue potential and coordination with other development partners. The analysis presented fills an important gap in the understanding of how Guinea can increase its tax revenues. On VAT, the study finds that addressing policy and administrative constraints can mobilize additional revenues while improving the business climate. On excise taxation, the study finds that existing excise rates are unevenly applied, with scope for raising rates in the future. To systematically address its revenue challenges across all tax types, Guinea should also consider development of a medium-term revenue strategy (MTRS). The report is structured as follows: in the first section, an overview of the evolution and composition of domestic revenues in Guinea is presented. In the second section, VAT is analyzed. The final section reviews excise tax policy and its implementation on international goods and domestic goods.