Special to PS - SERVICE LEARNING IN POLITICAL SCIENCE - Service Learning in Political Science: An Introduction
In: PS: political science & politics, Band 33, Heft 3, S. 615-616
ISSN: 0030-8269, 1049-0965
2419589 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: PS: political science & politics, Band 33, Heft 3, S. 615-616
ISSN: 0030-8269, 1049-0965
In: PS: political science & politics, Band 30, Heft 3, S. 525-530
ISSN: 0030-8269, 1049-0965
In: European journal of political research: official journal of the European Consortium for Political Research, Band 20, Heft 3-4, S. 279-300
ISSN: 1475-6765
In: Polity, Band 33, Heft 4, S. 101-133
ISSN: 1744-1684
Traditionally, the scientific study of politics has been associated with a value-neutral approach to the subject. One seeks to uncover what is, not what ought to be, in the political realm. This is what distinguishes a "positive" science from opinionizing, social engineering, or political philosophy. In recent decades, one detects a growing uneasiness with the venerable fact/value dichotomy, at least as it was traditionally understood. It is not clear, however, where this leaves us. (Is the fact/value dichotomy dead?) Against this backdrop, we present the following argument. If political science is to matter to policymakers or citizens, as most political scientists believe it should, authors must be clear about how their subject ties into some broader telos that others might share. Thus, one might fruitfully distinguish three sorts of issues. First, how does a particular subject of political science affect the broader public? (What is its relevance?) Second, how can one demonstrate this relevance empirically? & finally, how might other ways of viewing this issue change the way the "goodness" of the subject is perceived? The first issue is simply a matter of clarification, the second a matter of demonstration, & the third a matter normally reserved for political philosophy. All are necessary components of a relevant & useful political science discipline.
In: European journal of political research: official journal of the European Consortium for Political Research, Band 20, Heft 3-4, S. 279
ISSN: 0304-4130
In: American political science review, Band 45, S. 641-661
ISSN: 0003-0554
Blog: UCL Political Science Events
Can the WTO survive the US-China trade rivalry? Is the Russia-Ukraine war the beginning of the end of the multilateral trade regime? And how can Europe respond to these tensions?
Blog: UCL Political Science Events
Does power corrupt or are corrupt people drawn to power? Are tyrants the products of bad systems or are they just bad people? And why do we give power to awful people?
Blog: UCL Political Science Events
This seminar brings together three speakers involved with previous high profile inquiries: Lord Phillips, chair of the BSE Inquiry (1998-2000); Sir Brian Leveson, chair of the Inquiry into Press Regulation (2011-12); and Margaret Aldred, secretary of the Iraq Inquiry (2009-16) chaired by the late Sir John Chilcot.
In: Inquiry: an interdisciplinary journal of philosophy and the social sciences, Band 2, Heft 1-4, S. 89-106
ISSN: 1502-3923
In: PS: political science & politics, Band 37, Heft 4, S. 925-926
Dear Colleague:This letter provides information about a recompetition of the American National Election Studies (ANES).
Blog: BYU Political Science Blog
Turbulent confirmation hearings don't change how Americans view the Supreme Court Our surveys also find that public opinion toward the court is divided by race and gender By Christopher N. Krewson and Jean R. Schroedel Oct. 1, 2020 at 3:00 a.m. MDT Even before President Trump nominated Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court, Senate Republicans had […]
In: Political geography: an interdisciplinary journal for all students of political studies with an interest in the geographical and spatial aspects, Band 18, Heft 8, S. 901-904
ISSN: 0962-6298
In: Political studies, Band 42, Heft 1, S. 103-104
ISSN: 0032-3217