Vincent Challet, associate professor of Paul Valery University Montpellier 3, have visited Dostoevsky Omsk State University with scientific seminar "Popular Protests in medieval Western Europe" on November 29, 2019. The event was placed on base of Historical Department with Scientific and Technical Department's support. The article is devoted results of this event in Dostoevsky Omsk State University.
Abstract This article combines qualitative and quantitative methods to rethink the literary history of late medieval China (830–960 CE). It begins with an overview of exchange poetry in the Tang dynasty and its role in the construction of the poetic subject, namely, the poetic subject's distributed textual body. A total of 10,869 poems exchanged between 2,413 individuals are cataloged to seek the structure of the collectively imagined literary relations of the time. This catalog is subjected to social-network analysis to reveal patterns and peculiarities in the extant corpus of late medieval poetry, which in turn prompt close readings of the sources. These readings lead to four conclusions about the history of late medieval poetry: (a) Buddhist monks were hubs of literary activity, (b) the poet Jia Dao became an increasingly important site of connection over time, (c) the concept of "poetic schools" is not a useful lens through which to view the Late Tang, and (d) poets at the center of the network are increasingly characterized by their mobility. This combination of network analysis and close reading highlights the dynamic nature of Chinese literary history, providing insight into the ever-shifting conjunctures of forms, genres, expectations, and relations in the late medieval literary world.
La historia del libro es marginal en el entramado textual de la manualística y, generalmente, aparece entrelazada en pocas líneas narrativas, en un armazón general de otros temas que los engloban y que pertenecen a esferas políticas y socio – económicas más que culturales. A pesar de la ubicación periférica en la espacialidad discursiva de los manuales escolares, detectamos al libro como objeto de análisis en sí mismo. Solo hay dos editoriales que lo incorporan como tema de estudio, Puerto de Palos y Estrada, ambas de origen nacional. Esto explica en gran parte la libertad mínima pero existente que poseen estas editoriales en detrimento de las internacionales que planifican contenidos para mercados más amplios. ; The history of the book is marginal in the textual framework of the textbook and generally appears intertwined in a few narrative lines of other themes that encompass them and that belong to political and socio- economic rather than cultural spheres. Despite the peripheral location in the discursive spatiality of school textbooks, we detect the book as an object of analysis in itself. There are only two publishing houses that incorporate it as a subject of study, Puerto de Palos and Estrada , both of national origin. This largely explains the minimal but existing freedom that these publishers have, to the detriment of international ones that plan content for broader markets. ; Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación ; Universidad Nacional del Litoral
La historia del libro es marginal en el entramado textual de la manualística y, generalmente, aparece entrelazada en pocas líneas narrativas, en un armazón general de otros temas que los engloban y que pertenecen a esferas políticas y socio – económicas más que culturales. A pesar de la ubicación periférica en la espacialidad discursiva de los manuales escolares, detectamos al libro como objeto de análisis en sí mismo. Solo hay dos editoriales que lo incorporan como tema de estudio, Puerto de Palos y Estrada, ambas de origen nacional. Esto explica en gran parte la libertad mínima pero existente que poseen estas editoriales en detrimento de las internacionales que planifican contenidos para mercados más amplios. ; The history of the book is marginal in the textual framework of the textbook and generally appears intertwined in a few narrative lines of other themes that encompass them and that belong to political and socio- economic rather than cultural spheres. Despite the peripheral location in the discursive spatiality of school textbooks, we detect the book as an object of analysis in itself. There are only two publishing houses that incorporate it as a subject of study, Puerto de Palos and Estrada, both of national origin. This largely explains the minimal but existing freedom that these publishers have, to the detriment of international ones that plan content for broader markets.
This paper aims to give a face to the 'globalization paradigm' at work in some global histories and to recognize similarities between this meta-narrative coordination of space and time, and older meta-narratives of the world. Narrating the space and time of the world in order to understand and represent its coherent meaning is not a new phenomenon. This paper looks to medieval history to show that despite claims that the history of globalization is unique to modernity, the meta-narrative is familiar to narrations of the space and time of the world produced in the Middle Ages, before the supposed advent of globalization. The aim is to challenge the assumption that the globalization paradigm is a modern phenomenon, since this assumption conceals links to old historiographies and epistemologies. It suggests that medieval history can offer a critical reflection on existing global histories as well as opening up new directions for the future of the field. In addition to questioning the 'modernity' of the globalization paradigm medieval history acts as a reminder of the historically constructed nature of global concepts and the need to think about the 'globe' as a diversely narrated and constructed subject rather than a singular-empirical object. The paper looks to the European Middle Ages to reflect on the politics of conceptualisations and historicisations of the 'globe', and to show that pluralities are not only produced beyond Europe but within it, and this is a tactical-historiographical move to break away from the contours of pre-existing critiques from the fields of postcolonial and Latin American studies.
"This book presents, in twenty international papers, the origins and development, and some of the main characteristics and diversities, of the academic discipline of medieval - and later - archaeology in a number of countries in northern Europe. Denmark is the main focus, together with the four other Scandinavian countries, the Faroes and Greenland. The book also provides an insight into some of the discipline's major achievements and fascinating discoveries in these parts of the world, as well as into some of the current research agendas, with their new perspectives, including developments towards the inclusion of the archaeology of more recent periods. The book is based on the proceedings of a conference held to celebrate 40 years of medieval archaeology as a university discipline in Denmark - one of the first countries to have a chair of medieval archaeology, established at Aarhus University, in 1971
