This study is specifically concerned with the impact of cultural tourism on the valorisation of two African fortifications; Castelo São Jorge da Mina (Elmina Castle) in Elmina, Ghana and Casteel de Goede Hoop (Castle of Good Hope) in Cape Town, South Africa. The commodification of national and world heritage, primarily within the context of cultural tourism, is the process by which tangible and intangible heritage are transformed into cultural commodities to be bought, sold and profited from in the heritage and tourism industry. The perception, however, that these commodified heritage sites are contaminated, and less authentic, is based on an outmoded discourse. The South African government has placed a fair amount of focus on redressing highly emotive colonial or dissonant heritage sites with the intent of correcting misinterpreted Eurocentric histories or present non-represented pre-colonial history. The study is structured around addressing the issue of commodification and its impact on the understanding and interpretation of heritage both as an emotive commodity and as a means of providing economic benefit to a community. The literature review locates the research in Marx's theories on commodities together with Urry's tourist gaze. It furthermore includes an analysis on valorisation, with the focus on associative value, in the context of national and world heritage. Fortifications as fortified military architecture in an African context are considered; as is the European influence on African culture and fortifications as colonial structures. Elmina Castle, as a much-researched heritage site, is explored in detail. It includes a legislative analysis; the perspectives and interpretations of the two largest stakeholders groups, the Akan-speaking Fanti population and the African American Diaspora tourists is key to the analysis of the impact of commodification. A detailed history of Europeans on the Gold Coast, the development of Elmina Castle and the impact of trans-Atlantic slavery on the consumption of heritage is studied. The commodification of the Castle of Good Hope is written within the context of the prevailing South African heritage discourse. Much has been written on the commodification of Elmina Castle, while very little has been said about the Castle of Good Hope as a commodity. The prevailing authorised commodification of the Castle of Good Hope necessitated the analysis and comparison of the Castle with the selected comparative case and the study draws comparisons between the powerful emotive significance and contestations attached to Elmina and the contrast that this poses to the Castle of God Hope as a place of heritage significance despite the fact that it has been seen to symbolise the introduction of repressive European influence and control in South Africa. The research supports the notion that cultural tourism and events have impacted on the valorisation of cultural heritage and, in particular, the associative and emotive values. However, the cultural significance of the two African fortifications as important heritage sites are not at risk.
The article analyzes the Ukrainian national elite of the postcolonial era through the prism of citizenship. In recent years, the interest in elitist issues has been grown significantly. In modern socio-humanitarian field, the issues of the elites' role in the modern world, the criteria for evaluating different elite's activity, the measure of their citizenship, patriotism and professionalism are often discussed. Positive social transformations in many respects depend on the qualitative state of modern Ukrainian elites, on their socio-political maturity, on their willingness and ability to consolidate Ukrainian society, on the level of their responsibility for the fate of Ukraine. The author of the article follows to the concept of plurality of elites (based on the idea of distinguishing elite groups in the fields of their leading activities), which enables the allocation of political, ideological, publicadministrative, military, economic and engineering, scientific, spiritual, medical, educational (pedagogical), cultural-artistic, religious, informational, sporting, etc. In the post-colonial period, all these elite groups must become an integral elements of the Ukrainian national elite. In article the citizen is analyzed as a subject of qualitative social transformations in the post-colonial period, as well as civil practices of self-organization of society in the context of modern transformational processes in Ukraine by the article. The phenomenon of civic activity of an elitist person is analyzed in a theoretical, methodological and empirical perspective. The article deals with theoretical and methodological bases, structure and development peculiarities of the civil position of the personality. Civil society is seen as a cultural and historical type of society. The peculiarities of its formation and functioning in post-colonial Ukraine are analyzed. The author suggests his own periodization of the civil society development in Ukraine. So, the Ukrainian national elite would become the true subject of decolonization of Ukraine and positive social transformations only when all its representatives will begin to perform their core functions in a responsible way: culture-creating, state-building, nation-building, as well as consolidating, creative-transforming, forecasting, motivational, mobilizing, administrating, spiritual-ideological, identification, patriotic, humanistic, axiological, democratic, stabilizing, strategic, security, etc. The Ukrainian national elite must respond on time to the challenges posed by time (globalization, ecological, economic, technological, informational, etc.). The most important for modern Ukraine isn't only the formation of an effective and responsible political elite that could consolidate other elite groups, directing their activities in a constructive way, but also ensuring its timely rotation, qualitative upgrading, de-oligarchy and overcoming its alienation from society. The national elite must carry out highquality legal, political, socio-economic, socio-cultural, technological, ecological and other transformations; to support the integrity and spiritual unity of society, the development of democracy and self-organization processes in Ukraine, the formation and approval of a civil-political and European civilization identity of Ukrainian citizens.
Рецензия посвящена учебному пособию «Квебек – Канада – Россия, 100 зеркал», предназначенному для студентов бакалавриата и магистратуры международного учебно-научного центра «Москва–Квебек» (Российский государственный гуманитарный университет), изучающих историю, политику, географию, экономику и куль-туру Квебека на русском и французском языках; а также для студентов, изучающих цивилизацию России в Университете им. Лаваля (Квебек, Канада). Данная публикация полностью двуязычна – тексты, иллюстрации и другие дополнительные материалы представлены на двух языках – русском и французском и расположены на од-ном развороте. В рецензии подчеркивается, что учебное пособие чрезвычайно интересно, поскольку оно написано с использованием компаративного и междисциплинарно-го подходов с широким применением информации из географии, истории, экономики, международных отношений. В рецензии отмечается, что выход столь интересного учебного пособия, безусловно, будет способствовать гармоничному и эффективному развитию делового, научно-образовательного и культурного двустороннего сотрудничества, в котором Россию и Канаду объединяют не только климат, бескрайние просторы и увлечение хоккеем. В рецензии подчеркивается, что выход учебного пособия будет способствовать исторически сложившемуся партнерству между Россией и Канадой. Представляется важным и тот факт, что в учебном пособии географическая тематика (природа, население и экономика) чаще всего представлена в аспекте сравнения Канады и Рос-сии, в то время как сравнение социально-культурных параметров протекает преимущественно по линии Россия – провинция Квебек. Это объяснено тем, что авторы пособия в обоих случаях старались следовать единой цели – способствовать пониманию реалий одной страны, обращаясь к аналогичным феноменам в другой. ; The review is devoted to the textbook "Quebec– Canada – Russia: 100 mirrors" intended for undergraduate and grad-uate international training and research center "Moscow-Quebec" (Russian State Humanitarian University), studying history, politics, geography, economy and culture of Quebec in French and Russian; as well as for students majoring in civilization of Russia in the Université Laval (Quebec, Cana-da). This publication is fully bilingual – texts, illustrations and other supplementary materials are presented in two lan-guages – Russian and French and are located on the same turn. The review stresses that the textbook is of great interest because it is written using comparative and interdisciplinary approaches with the wide application of information from geography, history, economics, international relations. This review states that the output of such an interesting tutorial will definitely contribute to the harmonious and effective de-velopment of business, scientific, educational and cultural bilateral cooperation, as Russia and Canada share not only the climate, the vast expanses and the fascination with hock-ey. The review stresses out that this training manual would contribute to the historical partnership between Russia and Canada. It is all the more important that in this textbook geo-graphical themes (nature, population and economy) are often presented in terms of comparison between Canada and Rus-sia, while comparison of the socio-cultural settings is held mainly between Russia and Quebec. The reason lies in the fact that authors in both cases tried to follow a common goal – to contribute to the understanding of the realities of one country, referring to similar phenomena in the other.
Immigration has, for many years, been the largest area of mass use of judicial review, regularly accounting for over 80 per cent of all claims lodged. During the 2000s, the number of immigration cases rose dramatically over-burdening the Administrative Court. In 2013, most cases were transferred to the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) (UTIAC), now a de facto specialist public law court.1 Some 90 per cent of immigration judicial reviews - three-quarters of all claims - are currently lodged with the UTIAC. This is a distinctive area of litigation. Immigration judicial reviews are neither sporadic nor peripheral, but recurrent and central. Such challenges arise in the context of the sometimes chronic administrative difficulties within the Home Office and often intense and politically-driven short-term pressures. Immigration decisions concern both intimate aspects of people's lives and the state's ability to regulate immigration. Immigration is also a complex and dynamic area of law, policy, and practice. The wider issue here is how to dispense justice for and manage effectively a high-volume of "bureaucratic� judicial reviews, that is, routine challenges that turn on their own individual facts and circumstances.2 This article seeks a better understanding of immigration judicial review litigation. Three themes organise the discussion. The first is whether immigration judicial reviews as a general category possess merit. In 1999, a minister complained that the "large number of unnecessary, vexatious, and useless� immigration judicial reviews created "delay, expense, and [was] counter-productive�.3 More recently, the Coalition Government has stated that there is a "culture of using meritless judicial review applications to delay immigration decisions�.4 Such a wide-ranging statement invites scrutiny of the data to determine levels of success. A second theme is how litigation is conducted in practice. Judicial review litigation should be conducted by the parties on a co-operative basis to assist the court. Yet, the pressures upon litigants can sometimes induce other behaviours. What do such behaviours tell us about how the parties contribute to the judicial process and executive attitudes toward judicial control? A third (longstanding) theme is how judicial review operates alongside other remedies, in particular, appeals. The Government's policy of gradually restricting appeal rights has been accelerated under the Immigration Act 2014. What was the rationale for restricting appeal rights and does it withstand scrutiny? What are the likely consequences? This article begins by examining the increased volume of immigration judicial reviews, the subject-matter of such claims, and the causes of the increase. This is followed by an examination of how challenges progress throughout the process and their outcomes through both formal adjudication and settlement. The focus then turns to the conduct of litigation. The final substantive section considers the relationship between appeals and judicial review.
В статті розглянуто зміст принципів міжнародного співробітництва в сфері лісівництва, прийнятих Конференцією ООН з навколишнього природного середовища 14 червня 1992 р. у Ріо-де-Жанейро, досліджено шляхи закріплення їх положень у національному лісовому законодавстві України. Виконане дослідження дозволило поділити ці принципи на три групи: 1) такі, що цілком імплементовані у діюче лісове законодавство; 2) такі, що знайшли часткове втілення у законодавстві; 3) такі, що потребують імплементації. ; The aticle considers the content of the principles of international cooperation in the field of forestry, adopted by the UN Conference on the environment 14 June 1992 in Rio de Janeiro, explores the ways of securing their positions in the national forest legislation of Ukraine. The study performed allowed to share these principles into three groups: 1) fully implemented in the curent legislation; 2) partially implemented and 3) requiring implementation. It is shown that the process of the implementation of international principles in the current forest legislation is unsystematic and fragmented, which dramatically reduces the effectiveness of legal norms in the fight against offenses in this area. According to this, it is important to describe the main essence of this principles:1 principle of combination of sovereign right for the states to master own resources in accordance with a strategic policy in industry of guard of environment with the necessity of minimization of harm to the environment of other states or districts outside national jurisdiction ,principle of sovereign and inalienable right for the states on the use, administration and development of forest resources in accordance with own necessities and level of socio-economic development and on the basis of national policy which conforms to the aims of steady development and legislation, principle of necessity of activation of efforts, directed on the rational use, maintainance and development of the forests, principle of important role of all of types of the forests, on business of maintenance of ecological processes and equilibrium on local, national, regional and global level, principle of respect and providing of originality, culture and rights for native people, and also other groups populations which lives in forest areas,principle of important role of the forests in satisfaction of raw material needs which must be combined with the rational use of forest resources, afforestation and reafforestation, principle of providing of conducive international economic climate for the balanced and ecologically grounded development of the forests in all countries, principle of increase of green cover of plan, principle of international support for developing countries and countries with a transitional economy, forthe purpose of improvement of administration, preservation and steady development forest resources. It is proved that the implementation of international principles in the current forest legislation contributes to the solution of complex problems of Ukrainian forests¸such as unsustainable forest management, the ineffectiveness of the model of forest management, reducing the stability of forest ecosystems to anthropogenic pressure, deterioration of the species composition of forests, etc.
We present the results of the microstratigraphic, phytolith and wood charcoal study of the remains of a 10.5 ka roof. The roof is part of a building excavated at Tell Qarassa (South Syria), assigned to the Pre-Pottery Neolithic B period (PPNB). The Pre-Pottery Neolithic (PPN) period in the Levant coincides with the emergence of farming. This fundamental change in subsistence strategy implied the shift from mobile to settled aggregated life, and from tents and huts to hard buildings. As settled life spread across the Levant, a generalised transition from round to square buildings occurred, that is a trademark of the PPNB period. The study of these buildings is fundamental for the understanding of the ever-stronger reciprocal socio-ecological relationship humans developed with the local environment since the introduction of sedentism and domestication. Descriptions of buildings in PPN archaeological contexts are usually restricted to the macroscopic observation of wooden elements (posts and beams) and mineral components (daub, plaster and stone elements). Reconstructions of microscopic and organic components are frequently based on ethnographic analogy. The direct study of macroscopic and microscopic, organic and mineral, building components performed at Tell Qarassa provides new insights on building conception, maintenance, use and destruction. These elements reflect new emerging paradigms in the relationship between Neolithic societies and the environment. A square building was possibly covered here with a radial roof, providing a glance into a topologic shift in the conception and understanding of volumes, from round-based to square-based geometries. Macroscopic and microscopic roof components indicate buildings were conceived for year-round residence rather than seasonal mobility. This implied performing maintenance and restoration of partially damaged buildings, as well as their adaptation to seasonal variability. ; Research is sponsored by the former Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN, HAR2011-21545-C02-01 The last hunter-gatherers and the first producing societies in Central and Southern Syria), the Ministry of Culture Spanish Institute of Cultural Heritage (Excavations Abroad) and the French Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs. A. Balbo has worked on this paper on contracts from JAEDoc, SimulPast Consolider and European Social Found. A. Arranz has the financial support of the Basque Government (Pre-doctoral grant Number: BFI.09.249). L. Zapata is a member of Research Group UPV/EHU IT-288-07 (Basque Government), UFI11/09 Cuaternario of the UPV/EHU and Project HAR2011-23716 (I+D+i). She is also funded by the Programa de Movilidad del Personal Investigador del Gobierno Vasco 2012. C. Lancelotti has worked on this paper on a contract from AGRIWESTMED (European Research Council funded). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. ; Peer reviewed
Bu çalışmada, demokrasinin işleyişinde yargının rolü ve meşruiyeti tartışılmaktadır. Demokrasinin tarihi her ne kadar iki bin beş yüz yıl öncesine dayanıyorsa da, demokrasinin neyi ifade ettiği hususu bugün dahi tartışmalıdır. Bu durum, demokrasi üzerine yapılacak çalışmaların her dönemde güncel bir ihtiyaca cevap vereceği anlamına gelmektedir. İşte günümüzdeki demokrasi tartışmalarına güncellik katan en önemli unsur, demokrasi ve yargı ilişkisi olmaktadır. Özellikle İkinci Dünya Savaşı'ndan sonra, yargının demokrasilerdeki rolü değişime uğramıştır. Bu dönemle birlikte, siyasi iktidarları sınırlama ihtiyacına cevap verebilecek en uygun çözümün, yargı yoluyla denetim olduğu fikri kabul görmeye başlamıştır. Böylece Anayasa Mahkemeleri aracılığıyla, yargıya siyasi rolün biçildiği bir döneme girilmiş olmaktadır. Demokrasi-yargı ilişkisini incelemeye değer kılan tek unsur elbette Anayasa Mahkemelerinin varlığı değildir. Yargıda yaşanan bütün sorunların bir şekilde demokratik sisteme zarar verdiği söylenebilir. Aynı şekilde, sağlıklı işleyen bir yargı düzeninin varlığı da, demokrasinin sağlıklı biçimde işlemesi için zorunlu olmaktadır. Bu durum, yargıya ilişkin kurumsal düzenlemelerin ve uygulamadan kaynaklanan sorunların incelenmesi gerekliliğini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu incelemeler ışığında, demokrasilerde yaşanan yargı kaynaklı sorunların önüne geçilmesi mümkün olabilir. Öte yandan, yargı kaynaklı sorunların gerçekten yargı kaynaklı olup-olmadığının anlaşılması için de yargının geniş biçimde incelenmesi gerekmektedir. Çünkü yargı kaynaklı olduğu düşünülen bazı sorunların aslında, siyasi iktidarlardan veya ilgili ülkedeki siyasi kültürden kaynaklanması söz konusu olmaktadır. ; This study discusses the role and legitimism of jurisdiction in democracy. Although the history of democracy dates back to as early as two thousand five hundred years ago, it is not understood fully even today. This means that studies on democracy are to respond to a current need. Thereby the most significant component that makes democracy discussions up-to-date is the relation between democracy and jurisdiction. Especially after the World War II, the role of jurisdiction in democracies has changed. With the beginning of this period, the contemplation that the most appropriate way to meet the need to limit political powers is to use jurisdiction has become popular. Therefore, an era in which jurisdiction is casted a political role via Constitutional Courts has began. The existence of Constitutional Courts is not the only factor that makes the relation between democracy-jurisdiction worthy of studying. It can be argued that all problems in jurisdiction somehow give harm to proper operation of democracy. Similarly, a robust jurisdiction entails a sound democracy. This case entails the examination of the problems resulting from institutional regulations and applications in jurisdiction. In the light of these examinations, it can be possible to prevent jurisdiction related problems in democracy. On the other hand, jurisdiction is to be examined comprehensively so as to decide whether problems are really jurisdiction related or not because it is possible that some problems which are considered to be jurisdiction related can stem from political power or the political culture in the country.
More than ten years ago, the Club of Rome published its much discussed report The First Global Revolution which stressed that our world possesses a promising opportunity, one unlikely to be provided again, to shape a new understanding and new attitudes towards the world as a whole. Whilst contemporary societies are much confused about morals and ethics, whilst we experience much social, educational, personal and environmental chaos, the Club of Rome report argued that it is essential for humanity to respond to this unique opportunity for a global revolution and find the wisdom needed to deal with it in the right way. But how can we find such wisdom? How can we deal with our personal, social and ecological predicaments? Traditionally, religions have fostered wisdom and morality, have shaped individuals and groups, yet their teachings have shown few outward signs of success because their loftiest ideals have rarely been put fully into practice. For the Club of Rome to appeal to inherited wisdom was a momentous step; it was an appeal to our global religious and philosophical heritage, but also to the task of analysing the powers of spirituality for contemporary society and culture, and to discern the different cultural and historical expressions of spirituality whilst assessing their significance for contemporary ecological thinking and concerns. More recently, the American ecological thinker Thomas Berry, much shaped by his deep knowledge of American native traditions, of eastern religions, and the work of the French thinker Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, also spoke about the need to draw on the resources of wisdom in his seminal book The Great Work. Our Way into the Future. The great work, which is the work of all the people, is "to create a mutually enhancing mode of human dwelling on the planet Earth". Thomas Berry speaks of the need to rediscover the spiritual sense of the universe and the need "to reinvent the human". To create a viable earth community, to develop the new world vision required for building a viable human future, the politics, education and financial arrangements around the globe – or governance, universities and corporations – need fundamental restructuring. This task is impossible to achieve if humankind does not creatively draw on what Berry calls the "four wisdoms": 1. the wisdom of the classical traditions, that is to say the wisdom of traditional religions and philosophies; 2. the wisdom of native peoples; 3. the wisdom of women; 4. the much more recent and newer wisdom of science. This is a profound insight, for we have so far little explored the spiritual resources of science and nature. The convergence of traditional spiritual perspectives of a religious consciousness with some of the spiritual insights that modern science yields is a truly exciting development for human consciousness and community. So how can we relate ecology, spirituality and our global religious heritage?
In: The Australian journal of politics and history: AJPH, Band 49, Heft 1, S. 114-153
ISSN: 1467-8497
Books reviewed:Martin Mulligan and Stuart Hill, Ecological Pioneers: A Social History of Australian Ecological Thought and ActionEdited by Bruce Kaye, Tom Frame, Colin Holden and Geoff Treloar, Anglicanism in Australia: A HistoryColin Holden, Church in a Landscape: A History of the Diocese of WangarattaMary Anne Jebb., Blood, Sweat and Welfare: A History of White Bosses and Aboriginal Pastoral WorkersDavid Philips, William Augustus Miles (1796–1851): Crime, Policing, and Moral Entrepreneurship in England and AustraliaCompiled by Alison Hoyle for State Records of South Australia, Ancestors In Archives: A Guide for Family Historians to South Australia's Government ArchivesJulie Carr, The Captive White Woman of Gippsland: In Pursuit of the LegendKeith Pescod, Good Food, Bright Fires & Civility: British Emigrant Depots of the 19th CenturyB.W. Higman, Domestic Service in AustraliaJoanne Scott, Ross Laurie, Bronwyn Stevens and Patrick Weller, The Engine Room of Government: The Queensland Premier's Department, 1859–2001Edited by Ann Millar, The Biographical Dictionary of the Australian Senate: Vol. 1 1901–1929M.D. Johnson, Australia, New Zealand and Federation 1883–1901. By Ged Martin.Ian Ward,Edited by John M. Moses and Christopher Pugsley, The German Empire and Britain's Pacific Dominions, 1871–1919: Essays on the Role of Australia and New Zealand in World Politics in the Age of ImperialismEdited by Martyn Lyons and John Arnold, A History of the Book in Australia 1891–1945Anna Green, British Capital, Antipodean Labour. Working the New Zealand Waterfront, 1915–1951George Davies, The Occupation of Japan: The Rhetoric and the Reality of Anglo–Australasian Relations 1939–1952Tim Rowse, Obliged to be Difficult. Nugget Coombs' Legacy in Indigenous AffairsIan Hancock, John Gorton: He Did It His WayDon Watson, Recollections of a Bleeding Heart: A Portrait of Paul Keating PMMark Finnane, When Police Unionise: the Politics of Law and Order in AustraliaBob Carr, Thoughtlines: Reflections of a Public ManEdited by Paul Nursey–Bray and Carol Lee Bachi, Left Directions: Is There a Third Way?Sinclair Dinnen, Law and Order in a Weak State: Crime and Politics in Papua New GuineaAnn Turner, Historical Dictionary of Papua New Guinea, Asian/Oceanian Historical Dictionaries No. 37Kerry Howe, Nature, Culture and History: the "Knowing" of OceaniaW.J. Mander, Alan P.F. Sell, et al., The Dictionary of Nineteenth–Century British PhilosophersManning Clark (Edited by Dymphna Clark, David Headon and John Williams), The Ideal of Alexis de TocquevilleR.B. Rose, Tribunes and Amazons: Men and Women of Revolutionary France, 1789–1871Ian Hunter, Rival Enlightenments: Civil and Metaphysical Philosophy in Early Modern GermanyMaiken Umbach (Ed.), German Federalism: Past, Present, FutureJudith Keene, Fighting for Franco: International Volunteers in Nationalist Spain During the Spanish Civil War, 1936–1939R.J.B. Bosworth, MussoliniEdited by John P. McCormick, Confronting Mass Democracy and Industrial Technology: Political and Social Theory from Nietzsche to HabermasAgnes Heller, A Theory of ModernityDouglas R. Holmes, Integral Europe: Fast–Capitalism, Multiculturalism, NeofascismRogan Kersh, Dreams of a More Perfect Union
"Where are the organized women workers?" Alice Kessler-Harris asked in 1975.1 Her question unleashed an unabating torrent of provocative studies of proletarian women in a number of countries, particularly in the United States and Europe.2 This deluge of solid research notwithstanding, activist women, to paraphrase Anne Firor Scott, continue to be seen and not seen.3 Pre-World War II Japanese women textile workers suffer the. same,.if not indeed a more pervasive, invisibility. When they are not generally overlooked, they are pitied as passive victims incapable of acting on their own initiative. When instances of activism are so obvious they cannot be ignored (as when silk reelers carried out a major strike in 1885), they are dismissed as unique, aberrant events. Women's failure to become the backbone of an enduring union movement confirms the conventional view of them as passive. Their gender, it is argued-or, as one scholar suggests, their youth4-made them hard to organize. Further research on women's collective action should modify this assertion. Even if the focus on collective action is limited to institutionalized, organized activism (that is, unions), we must ask whether structural factors like the organization of the factory itself or attitudinal factors like the hostility of male unionists, and not women's "nature" or "culture," explain the lower rate of female participation. Louise Tilly argues persuasively that proletarian women's lower rate of participation in collective action in nineteenth-century France needs "no special psychological or gender-attribute explanation": that is, a similar set of conditions may be used to predict men's and women's propensity to activism. 5 Societal constraints, restrictions by management on the economic independence of female workers, and, in certain circumstances, the workers' own views of what was appropriate behavior for women may have slowed female labor organization in Japan; yet when conditions for activism existed women workers responded. The question of activism, however, should not be limited to formal political or union actions. This chapter attempts to expand the definition of the term "activism" to connote the opposite of passivity. Thus, activism manifested itself as much in the decisions of rural Japanese women and girls to enter employment in the cotton textile industry as in their collective actions as workers. To understand why farm women would be motivated to enter the mills, one must examine general attitudes regarding appropriate behavior for women in the 1920s. To be sure, what women saw as suitable for themselves as women was itself in a state of evolution. As Teresa de Lauretis notes, "Self and identity . are always grasped and understood within particular discursive configurations. Consciousness is never fixed, never attained once and for all because discursive boundaries change with historical conditions."6 The converse is equally true: women's contributions to the definition of gender helped produce shifts in their historical context.
Oct. 18, 2005 28 pgs Kate Moss loses high profile modeling contracts after photos showed her using drugs in London recording studios; global warming shown to have severe impacts on Canadian wildlife; enrollment in computer science programs decreasing in Canadian universities; increase in tuition fees ends Ontario's tuition-freeze; Alberta introducing new plans to attract immigrant workers; Professor Sewell is interviewed; hockey returns after a year-long players strike; healthy living greatly enhances your mind; obesity becoming an acceptable way of living; a review of the novel "Until I Find You". Contributers: Marissa Baratta, Andor Bene, Bogie Bene, Daniel Byrnes, Celine Castonguay, Lauren Crawshaw, Madeline Feicht, Erin Marie H., Jessica Henderson, Kyla Jones, Monserrat Glasman, Karolina Gradkowska, Andrea Palichuk, Anais Kadian, Sara Maharajah, Karen Murray, Loic Ransom, Julien Resche, Ashwini Sukumaran, Pier-B Tremblay, Ian Tully, Marie-Eve Truchon, Jean-Louis Voyer Editor in Chief: Ashley Beaulac Assistant Editor: Tia Brazda News: Christina Sibian Campus Life: Ashley Jestin Health and Wellness: Michelle Rasanu World Politics: Rob Zanfir French/Arts and Culture: Paula Anastasiade Metropolis: Tia Brazda Opinions: Lourdes Villamor Sports: Ammar jamil Creative Writing: Kristjanna Grimmelt Odds and Ends: Jennifer Capano Web Development: Christina Ratis Design: Jennifer Rong, Khushnam Polad Entertainment: Ashley Beaulac Article titles: "Frog-de-lys" In the memory of tomorrow Systematic self-destruction We asked you: have you heard of the Glendon Ghost stories? Do you believe in ghosts, and have you had any ghostly experiences? Southeast Asia suffers "mountain tsunami" Kate Moss under fire for cocaine photos Global warming: a serious threat Low comp sci enrolment nation-wide could mean a shortage of IT workers End of Ontario's tuition freeze catches student groups off-guard Alberta rolls out plan to attract more immigrant workers, jobs to go to Canadians first Does Glendon really recycle? Events La personne complete State of the Union address Mexico symposium fun at Unicorn Why Canada? The ISSA had begun! Getting to know.Professor Sewell Discover Kensington Market Fashion trends Mmm.des dumplings Les cavernes d'Ali baba Ghost definitions Mrs. Wood's spirit unleashed Glendon urban legends Canada's slow response to the World's need Democracy in Iraq a sham: Klein Hockey's back! Drug confession: cycling is dope CBC Sports: "the once great CBC Sports is dying a slow and painful death" The sweetener science University recreation: intramural sports Update: health challenge 2005 Cut the fat-junk food shouldn't be in our schools A healthy body is a healthy mind Who cares about obesity? "Until I Find You": a literary masterpiece A Glendon student's account of the Word on the Street Festival Art, censorship and war: a call to protect artists' rights High times for Bergen: Vietnam tale listed for Giller Newest addition to the National Gallery of Canada "Serenity": or why Nick Cage is a terrible actor Writer's craft Wake-up from your make-up A user's guide to journalistic cliche's Dear ely Horoscopes Words 4 nerds
We thank T. Hapola for implementing the minimal walking technicolor model using MADGRAPH to generate the signal and for his help with acceptance studies. The limits shown in Sec. XII were calculated using computing resources provided by the Argonne Leadership Computing Facility and the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center. We thank CERN for the very successful operation of the LHC, as well as the support staff from our institutions without whom ATLAS could not be operated efficiently. We acknowledge the support of ANPCyT, Argentina; YerPhI, Armenia; ARC, Australia; BMWF and FWF, Austria; ANAS, Azerbaijan; SSTC, Belarus; CNPq and FAPESP, Brazil; NSERC, NRC, and CFI, Canada; CERN; CONICYT, Chile; CAS, MOST, and NSFC, China; COLCIENCIAS, Colombia; MSMT CR, MPO CR, and VSC CR, Czech Republic; DNRF, DNSRC, and Lundbeck Foundation, Denmark; EPLANET, ERC, and NSRF, European Union; IN2P3-CNRS, CEA-DSM/ IRFU, France; GNSF, Georgia; BMBF, DFG, HGF, MPG, and AvH Foundation, Germany; GSRT and NSRF, Greece; ISF, MINERVA, GIF, I-CORE, and Benoziyo Center, Israel; INFN, Italy; MEXT and JSPS, Japan; CNRST, Morocco; FOM and NWO, Netherlands; BRF and RCN, Norway; MNiSW and NCN, Poland; GRICES and FCT, Portugal; MNE/IFA, Romania; MES of Russia and ROSATOM, Russian Federation; JINR, MSTD, Serbia; MSSR, Slovakia; ARRS and MIZŠ, Slovenia; DST/NRF, South Africa; MINECO, Spain; SRC and Wallenberg Foundation, Sweden; SER, SNSF, and Cantons of Bern and Geneva, Switzerland; NSC, Taiwan; TAEK, Turkey; STFC, the Royal Society and Leverhulme Trust, United Kingdom; DOE and NSF, United States of America. The crucial computing support from all WLCG partners is acknowledged gratefully, in particular from CERN and the ATLAS Tier-1 facilities at TRIUMF (Canada), NDGF (Denmark, Norway, Sweden), CC-IN2P3 (France), KIT/ GridKA (Germany), INFN-CNAF (Italy), NL-T1 (Netherlands), PIC (Spain), ASGC (Taiwan), RAL (UK), and BNL (USA) and in the Tier-2 facilities worldwide. ; The ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider is used to search for high-mass resonances decaying to dielectron or dimuon final states. Results are presented from an analysis of proton-proton (pp) collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 8 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 20.3 fb−1 in the dimuon channel. A narrow resonance with Standard Model Z couplings to fermions is excluded at 95% confidence level for masses less than 2.79 TeV in the dielectron channel, 2.53 TeV in the dimuon channel, and 2.90 TeV in the two channels combined. Limits on other model interpretations are also presented, including a grand-unification model based on the E6 gauge group, Z∗ bosons, minimal Z' models, a spin-2 graviton excitation from Randall-Sundrum models, quantum black holes, and a minimal walking technicolor model with a composite Higgs boson. ; ANPCyT ; YerPhI, Armenia ; Australian Research Council ; BMWF, Austria ; Austrian Science Fund (FWF) ; Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences (ANAS) ; SSTC, Belarus ; National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) ; Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) ; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada ; NRC, Canada ; Canada Foundation for Innovation ; CERN, Chile ; Comision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica (CONICYT) ; Chinese Academy of Sciences ; Ministry of Science and Technology, China ; National Natural Science Foundation of China ; Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovacion Colciencias ; Ministry of Education, Youth & Sports - Czech Republic Czech Republic Government ; DNRF, Denmark ; Danish Natural Science Research Council ; Lundbeckfonden ; European Union (EU) European Research Council (ERC) ; European Union (EU) ; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) ; CEA-DSM/IRFU, France ; GNSF, Georgia ; Federal Ministry of Education & Research (BMBF) ; German Research Foundation (DFG) ; HGF, Germany ; Max Planck Society ; Alexander von Humboldt Foundation ; Greek Ministry of Development-GSRT ; NSRF, Greece ; Israel Science Foundation ; MINERVA, Israel ; German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development ; I-CORE, Israel ; Benoziyo Center, Israel ; Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) ; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan (MEXT) Japan Society for the Promotion of Science ; CNRST, Morocco ; FOM (The Netherlands) Netherlands Government ; Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) Netherlands Government ; BRF, Norway ; RCN, Norway ; Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Poland ; NCN, Poland ; GRICES, Portugal ; Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology ; MNE/IFA, Romania ; Russian Federation ; JINR, Serbia ; MSTD, Serbia ; MSSR, Slovakia ; Slovenian Research Agency - Slovenia ; MIZS, Slovenia ; DST/NRF, South Africa ; MINECO, Spain ; SRC, Sweden ; Wallenberg Foundation, Sweden ; SER, Switzerland ; Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) ; Cantons of Bern, Switzerland ; Geneva, Switzerland ; National Science Council of Taiwan ; Ministry of Energy & Natural Resources - Turkey ; Royal Society of London ; Leverhulme Trust ; United States Department of Energy (DOE) ; National Science Foundation (NSF) ; Science & Technology Facilities Council (STFC) ST/I000178/1 ST/K00140X/1 ATLAS ST/M000664/1 ST/M000761/1 ST/L001179/1 ST/I000186/1 GRIDPP ST/K000713/1 ST/K001310/1 ATLAS Upgrades ST/J00474X/1 ST/J004928/1 ATLAS Upgrade ST/L003112/1 ST/L001179/1 ATLAS Upgrade ST/G502320/1 ST/I006056/1 ATLAS Upgrades ST/J005487/1 ST/J005533/1 ST/J500641/1 ST/K50208X/1 ST/K000705/1 ST/K001310/1 ATLAS ST/K001337/1 ST/K001329/1 ST/K001337/1 ATLAS ATLAS ST/M002306/1 ST/L001179/1 ATLAS Upgrades ST/K00137X/1 ST/K001248/1 ST/H001026/1 ST/K001310/1 LHCb ST/M001474/1 ST/I005803/1 ST/K001310/1 ST/H00100X/2 ST/L006464/1 PP/E003087/1 ST/H00095X/1 ST/M002306/1 ATLAS Upgrades ST/L001195/1 ST/L000970/1 ST/H001026/2 ST/G50228X/1 PP/E002846/1 PP/D002915/1 ST/J004928/1 ST/K001302/1 ST/K001310/1 LHCb Upgrades ST/I00372X/1 GRIDPP ST/J005525/1 ST/F00754X/1 ST/M002071/1 ATLAS Upgrades ST/L003325/1 ST/K001426/1 ATLAS ST/M007103/1 ATLAS Upgrades ST/M003213/1 ST/L006480/1 ST/L00352X/1 ST/K001264/1 ATLAS PP/E000487/1 ST/I006056/1 ATLAS Upgrade ST/I006080/1 ST/J004944/1 ST/J501074/1 ST/K003658/1 PP/E000355/1 ST/H00095X/2 ST/I00372X/1 ST/H00100X/1 ST/I505756/1 ST/K001388/1 ST/M001733/1 ST/I006056/1 1091701 ST/K003658/1 GRIDPP ST/L000970/1 ATLAS Upgrade ST/K502236/1 ST/K001418/1 ST/J005576/1 ST/J00474X/1 ATLAS Upgrades PP/E000444/1 ST/F007418/1 ST/I005803/1 GRIDPP ST/H001069/2 ST/K00140X/1 ST/L001209/1 ATLAS Upgrades
Acknowledgments We thank CERN for the very successful operation of the LHC, as well as the support staff from our institutions without whom ATLAS could not be operated efficiently. We acknowledge the support of ANPCyT, Argentina; YerPhI, Armenia; ARC, Australia; BMWF and FWF, Austria; ANAS, Azerbaijan; SSTC, Belarus; CNPq and FAPESP, Brazil; NSERC, NRC and CFI, Canada; CERN; CONICYT, Chile; CAS, MOST and NSFC, China; COLCIENCIAS, Colombia; MSMT CR, MPO CR and VSC CR, Czech Republic; DNRF, DNSRC and Lundbeck Foundation, Denmark; EPLANET, ERC and NSRF, European Union; IN2P3-CNRS, CEA-DSM/IRFU, France; GNSF, Georgia; BMBF, DFG, HGF, MPG and AvH Foundation, Germany; GSRT and NSRF, Greece; ISF, MINERVA, GIF, I-CORE and Benoziyo Center, Israel; INFN, Italy; MEXT and JSPS, Japan; CNRST, Morocco; FOM and NWO, Netherlands; BRF and RCN, Norway; MNiSW and NCN, Poland; GRICES and FCT, Portugal; MNE/IFA, Romania; MES of Russia and ROSATOM, Russian Federation; JINR; MSTD, Serbia; MSSR, Slovakia; ARRS and MIZS, Slovenia; DST/NRF, South Africa; MINECO, Spain; SRC ˇ and Wallenberg Foundation, Sweden; SER, SNSF and Cantons of Bern and Geneva, Switzerland; NSC, Taiwan; TAEK, Turkey; STFC, the Royal Society and Leverhulme Trust, United Kingdom; DOE and NSF, United States of America. The crucial computing support from all WLCG partners is acknowledged gratefully, in particular from CERN and the ATLAS Tier-1 facilities at TRIUMF (Canada), NDGF (Denmark, Norway, Sweden), CC-IN2P3 (France), KIT/GridKA (Germany), INFN-CNAF (Italy), NL-T1 (Netherlands), PIC (Spain), ASGC (Taiwan), RAL (U.K.) and BNL (U.S.A.) and in the Tier-2 facilities worldwide. ; Searches for the electroweak production of charginos, neutralinos and sleptons in final states characterized by the presence of two leptons (electrons and muons) and missing transverse momentum are performed using 20.3 fb−1 of proton-proton collision data at √s = 8 TeV recorded with the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider. No significant excess beyond Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the masses of the lightest chargino, next-to-lightest neutralino and sleptons for different lightest-neutralino mass hypotheses in simplified models. Results are also interpreted in various scenarios of the phenomenological Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model. ; ANPCyT ; YerPhI, Armenia ; Australian Research Council ; BMWF, Austria ; Austrian Science Fund (FWF) ; Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences (ANAS) ; SSTC, Belarus ; National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) ; Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) ; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada ; NRC, Canada ; Canada Foundation for Innovation ; CERN ; Comision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica (CONICYT) ; Chinese Academy of Sciences ; Ministry of Science and Technology, China ; National Natural Science Foundation of China ; Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovacion Colciencias ; Ministry of Education, Youth & Sports - Czech Republic Czech Republic Government ; DNRF, Denmark ; Danish Natural Science Research Council ; Lundbeckfonden ; European Union (EU) ; European Union (EU) European Research Council (ERC) ; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) ; CEA-DSM/IRFU, France ; GNSF, Georgia ; Federal Ministry of Education & Research (BMBF) ; German Research Foundation (DFG) ; HGF, Germany ; Max Planck Society ; Alexander von Humboldt Foundation ; Greek Ministry of Development-GSRT ; NSRF, Greece ; Israel Science Foundation ; MINERVA, Israel ; German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development ; I-CORE, Israel ; Benoziyo Center, Israel ; Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) ; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan (MEXT) Japan Society for the Promotion of Science ; CNRST, Morocco ; FOM (The Netherlands) Netherlands Government ; Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) Netherlands Government ; BRF, Norway ; RCN, Norway ; Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Poland ; NCN, Poland ; GRICES, Portugal ; Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology ; MNE/IFA, Romania ; Russian Federation ; JINR ; MSTD, Serbia ; MSSR, Slovakia ; Slovenian Research Agency - Slovenia ; MIZ. S, Slovenia ; DST/NRF, South Africa ; MINECO, Spain ; SRC, Sweden ; Wallenberg Foundation, Sweden ; SER, Switzerland ; Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) ; Cantons of Bern and Geneva, Switzerland ; National Science Council of Taiwan ; Ministry of Energy & Natural Resources - Turkey ; Royal Society and Leverhulme Trust, United Kingdom ; United States Department of Energy (DOE) ; National Science Foundation (NSF) ; Science & Technology Facilities Council (STFC) ST/H001042/2 ST/J005576/1 ST/J005525/1 ST/I006080/1 ST/I006056/1 ATLAS Upgrade ST/I00372X/1 GRIDPP ST/M002306/1 ST/K001426/1 ATLAS ST/K001302/1 PP/E002846/1 ST/H00100X/2 ST/I005811/1 ST/K001310/1 ATLAS Upgrades ST/L006464/1 ST/K001264/1 ATLAS ATLAS ST/M003213/1 ST/M002071/1 ATLAS Upgrades ST/H001026/1 ST/J004944/1 ST/I005803/1 GRIDPP ST/I505756/1 ST/K001310/1 LHCb ST/K001418/1 ST/K003658/1 ST/L001179/1 ATLAS Upgrade ST/L003112/1 ST/L000970/1 ATLAS Upgrade ST/L001195/1 ST/K001361/1 ST/K000713/1 ST/H001093/2 ST/G50228X/1 ST/G502320/1 ST/J00474X/1 ATLAS Upgrades ST/K001310/1 ATLAS ST/J004928/1 PP/D002915/1 ST/K001361/1 ATLAS Upgrades ST/K001361/1 MINOS/MINOS+ ST/K003437/1 ST/L001209/1 ATLAS Upgrades ST/I00372X/1 ST/H001042/1 ST/L000970/1 ST/K003437/1 GRIDPP ST/K001337/1 ATLAS ST/J004928/1 ATLAS Upgrade ST/J002798/1 PP/E000347/1 ST/G006717/1 ST/I006056/1 ATLAS Upgrades ST/K001248/1 ST/K001361/1 LHCb Upgrades ST/L001144/1 ST/L00352X/1 ST/L003325/1 ST/K003658/1 GRIDPP ST/K00073X/1 ST/J00474X/1 PP/E002757/1 ST/H001026/2 ST/K001310/1 ST/K001329/1 GRIDPP ST/I006056/1 ST/I000186/1 PP/E003087/1 ST/F00754X/1 ST/J005533/1 ST/L001179/1 ST/F007418/1 ST/L001179/1 ATLAS Upgrades PP/E000355/1 ST/I005803/1 ST/K000659/1 ST/K001361/1 LHCb ST/M001733/1 ST/K001361/1 ATLAS ST/K501840/1 GRIDPP ST/M000664/1 ST/H00100X/1 ST/H001069/2 ST/H001093/1 ST/J501074/1 ST/M001474/1 PP/E000444/1 ST/K00140X/1 ST/K501840/1 ST/K001388/1 ST/J005460/1 PP/E000487/1 ST/M001431/1 ST/K50208X/1 ST/K00137X/1 ST/K001310/1 LHCb Upgrades ST/J500641/1 ST/J005487/1 ST/H00095X/1 ST/K000705/1 ST/I000178/1 ST/H00095X/2 ST/K00140X/1 ATLAS ST/M000761/1 ST/M007103/1 ATLAS Upgrades ST/M002306/1 ATLAS Upgrades ST/L006480/1 ; ICREA
We thank CERN for the very successful operation of the LHC, as well as the support staff from our institutions, without whom ATLAS could not be operated efficiently. We acknowledge the support of ANPCyT, Argentina; YerPhI, Armenia; ARC, Australia; BMWF and FWF, Austria; ANAS, Azerbaijan; SSTC, Belarus; CNPq and FAPESP, Brazil; NSERC, NRC, and CFI, Canada; CERN; CONICYT, Chile; CAS, MOST, and NSFC, China; COLCIENCIAS, Colombia; MSMT CR, MPO CR, and VSC CR, Czech Republic; DNRF, DNSRC, and Lundbeck Foundation, Denmark; EPLANET, ERC, and NSRF, European Union; IN2P3-CNRS and CEA-DSM/IRFU, France; GNSF, Georgia; BMBF, DFG, HGF, MPG, and AvH Foundation, Germany; GSRT and NSRF, Greece; ISF, MINERVA, GIF, I-CORE, and Benoziyo Center, Israel; INFN, Italy; MEXT and JSPS, Japan; CNRST, Morocco; FOM and NWO, Netherlands; BRF and RCN, Norway; MNiSW and NCN, Poland; GRICES and FCT, Portugal; MNE/IFA, Romania; MES of Russia and ROSATOM, Russian Federation; JINR; MSTD, Serbia; MSSR, Slovakia; ARRS and MIZS, Slovenia; DST/NRF, South Africa; MINECO, Spain; SRC and Wallenberg Foundation, Sweden; SER, SNSF, and Cantons of Bern and Geneva, Switzerland; NSC, Taiwan; TAEK, Turkey; STFC, the Royal Society, and Leverhulme Trust, United Kingdom; DOE and NSF, U.S. The crucial computing support from all WLCG partners is acknowledged gratefully, in particular from CERN and the ATLAS Tier-1 facilities at TRIUMF (Canada), NDGF (Denmark, Norway, and Sweden), CC-IN2P3 (France), KIT/GridKA (Germany), INFN-CNAF (Italy), NL-T1 (Netherlands), PIC (Spain), ASGC (Taiwan), RAL (United Kingdom) and BNL (U.S.), and in the Tier-2 facilities worldwide. ; A search for scalar particles decaying via narrow resonances into two photons in the mass range 65–600 GeV is performed using 20.3 fb−1 of √s=8 TeV pp collision data collected with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider. The recently discovered Higgs boson is treated as a background. No significant evidence for an additional signal is observed. The results are presented as limits at the 95% confidence level on the production cross section of a scalar boson times branching ratio into two photons, in a fiducial volume where the reconstruction efficiency is approximately independent of the event topology. The upper limits set extend over a considerably wider mass range than previous searches. ; ANPCyT ; YerPhI, Armenia ; Australian Research Council ; BMWF, Austria ; Austrian Science Fund (FWF) ; Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences (ANAS) ; SSTC, Belarus ; National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) ; Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) ; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada ; NRC, Canada ; Canada Foundation for Innovation ; CERN ; Comision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica (CONICYT) ; Chinese Academy of Sciences ; Ministry of Science and Technology, China ; National Natural Science Foundation of China ; Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovacion Colciencias ; Ministry of Education, Youth & Sports - Czech Republic Czech Republic Government ; DNRF, Denmark ; Danish Natural Science Research Council ; Lundbeckfonden ; European Union (EU) ; European Union (EU) European Research Council (ERC) ; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) ; CEA-DSM/IRFU, France ; GNSF, Georgia ; Federal Ministry of Education & Research (BMBF) ; German Research Foundation (DFG) ; HGF, Germany ; Max Planck Society ; Alexander von Humboldt Foundation ; Greek Ministry of Development-GSRT ; NSRF, Greece ; Israel Science Foundation ; MINERVA, Israel ; German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development ; I-CORE, Israel ; Benoziyo Center, Israel ; Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) ; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan (MEXT) Japan Society for the Promotion of Science ; CNRST, Morocco ; FOM (The Netherlands) Netherlands Government ; Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) Netherlands Government ; BRF, Norway ; RCN, Norway ; Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Poland ; NCN, Poland ; GRICES, Portugal ; Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology ; MNE/IFA, Romania ; Russian Federation ; JINR ; MSTD, Serbia ; MSSR, Slovakia ; Slovenian Research Agency - Slovenia ; MIZS, Slovenia ; DST/NRF, South Africa ; MINECO, Spain ; SRC, Sweden ; Wallenberg Foundation, Sweden ; SER, Switzerland ; Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) ; Cantons of Bern and Geneva, Switzerland ; National Science Council of Taiwan ; Ministry of Energy & Natural Resources - Turkey ; The Royal Society, United Kingdom ; Leverhulme Trust ; United States Department of Energy (DOE) ; National Science Foundation (NSF) ; Science & Technology Facilities Council (STFC) ST/L001179/1 ATLAS Upgrade ST/K003658/1 ST/K001388/1 ST/K001310/1 LHCb ST/K00073X/1 ST/I005803/1 PP/E000355/1 ST/L006464/1 ST/L001195/1 ST/K00140X/1 ST/I005811/1 PP/E002846/1 ATLAS ST/L006480/1 ST/J00474X/1 ST/H001042/2 ST/I00372X/1 PP/E003087/1 ST/M001474/1 ST/K001337/1 ST/I000186/1 PP/E002757/1 ST/H001026/1 ST/K000705/1 ST/I006056/1 ST/J500641/1 ST/K001361/1 ATLAS ST/J004928/1 ST/K001310/1 LHCb Upgrades ST/K00137X/1 ST/M001733/1 ST/L000970/1 ST/K003437/1 GRIDPP ST/K001264/1 ATLAS ST/K00140X/1 ATLAS ST/K001310/1 ST/I00372X/1 GRIDPP ST/I006080/1 ST/K501840/1 ST/I006056/1 ATLAS Upgrade ST/K001361/1 ST/K001361/1 ATLAS Upgrades ST/K001361/1 MINOS/MINOS+ ST/K003437/1 ST/K001337/1 ATLAS ST/J002798/1 PP/E000347/1 ST/K000713/1 ST/G50228X/1 ST/K001329/1 ATLAS ST/H001069/2 ST/I505756/1 ST/M007103/1 ATLAS Upgrades ST/F00754X/1 ST/J005533/1 ST/K001302/1 ST/M000761/1 ST/K001248/1 ST/K001361/1 LHCb Upgrades ST/L001179/1 ST/L001209/1 ATLAS Upgrades ST/J004928/1 ATLAS Upgrade ST/H001026/2 ST/I006056/1 ATLAS Upgrades ST/L001144/1 ST/L001179/1 ATLAS Upgrades ST/K001361/1 LHCb ST/K502236/1 ST/K000659/1 ST/J005525/1 ST/M002306/1 ST/J004944/1 ST/H00095X/2 ST/K001310/1 ATLAS ST/K003658/1 GRIDPP ST/L000970/1 ATLAS Upgrade ST/L003112/1 ST/L003325/1 ST/J00474X/1 ATLAS Upgrades ST/G502320/1 ST/M003213/1 ST/M002306/1 ATLAS Upgrades ST/K001310/1 ATLAS Upgrades ST/H001093/2 ST/H001093/1 ST/H00100X/1 PP/E000487/1 ST/M001431/1 ST/M000664/1 ST/K001418/1 ST/J005576/1 ST/K50208X/1 ST/J005487/1 ST/H00095X/1 ST/J005460/1 ST/K501840/1 GRIDPP ST/K001426/1 ATLAS ST/H00100X/2 ST/L00352X/1 PP/E000444/1 ST/I000178/1 ST/H001042/1 ST/J501074/1 ST/I005803/1 GRIDPP ST/M002071/1 ATLAS Upgrades GRIDPP PP/D002915/1 ST/F007418/1 ; ICREA
