Suchergebnisse

The history of economic thought in the 20thcentury gave rise to a series of important discussions that have guided economic politics and geopolitical relations in most countries in the world. The criticism to the tenets of classical economy would originate a number of proposals that lay down significant reforms. This article describes and analyzes the proposals of two schools that justly confront classical thought. The first one belonging to John Maynard Keynes questions the "natural" order of economic laws and suggests a key intervention of the State in their regulation. The second one is that of Friedrich Hayek, which would lay the foundations of neoliberalism, based on a fundamental economic freedom (even above political freedom) and an intervention of the State in it. The article concludes with an analysis of the economic politics in Chile and Peru, countries that illustrate the ultimately development of a neoliberal model in the last decades. ; La historia del pensamiento económico en el siglo XX ha tenido una serie de importantes debates que orientarían las políticas económicas y las relaciones geopolíticas en gran parte de los países del mundo. En base a la crítica de los postulados de la economía clásica, se dieron una serie de propuestas que marcarían una serie de reformas significativas. Este artículo describe y analiza las propuestas de dos escuelas que confrontan justamente al pensamiento clásico. La primera, de John Maynard Keynes, que critica el orden "natural" de las leyes económicas y propone una intervención clave del Estado en su regulación. La segunda, de Friedrich Hayek, que sentaría las bases del neoliberalismo, y que se basa en proponer una fundamental libertad económica (incluso por encima de la política) y una intervención del Estado en la misma. El artículo cierra con un análisis de las políticas económicas en Chile y Perú, países que pueden ejemplificar cómo se ha desarrollado finalmente un modelo económico neoliberal en las últimas décadas.

Frequent instances of intervention in current world affairs have threatened the status of nonintervention as a rule of international relations. Gathering evidence from history, law, sociology, and political science, R. J. Vincent concludes that the principle of nonintervention can and must remain viable. The author approaches the question from several angles, seeking to discover why the principle of nonintervention has been asserted as part of the law of nations; whether states in the past and present have conducted their foreign relations according to the principle of nonintervention; and w

Frequent instances of intervention in current world affairs have threatened the status of nonintervention as a rule of international relations. Gathering evidence from history, law, sociology, and political science, R.J. Vincent concludes that the principle of nonintervention can and must remain viable. The author approaches the question from several angles, seeking to discover why the principle of nonintervention has been asserted as part of the law of nations; whether states in the past and present have conducted their foreign relations according to the principle of nonintervention; and w.

This study explores three generations of approaches to ending conflict and examines how, in the context of the failings of the Westphalian international system, their peacekeeping, mediation and negotiation, conflict resolution and peacebuilding approaches as well as UN peace operations, and asks via an empirical and theoretical analysis, what role such approaches have played and are playing in replicating an international system prone to intractable forms of conflict