Search results

Canis lupus fait partie des espèces protégées. La mise à mort intentionnelle de loups est donc interdite mais des dérogations à ce principe sont possibles lorsque les dégâts causés à l'élevage sont trop importants. La réglementation prévoit une gradation des interventions : dissuasion par effarouchement, tir de défense du berger pour protéger son troupeau et prélèvements de l'État portant sur un nombre de loups annuellement déterminé. Or, ces tirs font l'objet de violents désaccords entre les acteurs qui sont partie prenante de la politique du loup en France, comme en témoigne la multiplication des recours devant les tribunaux administratifs. La question de l'acceptabilité sociale des tirs de loups est donc au cœur des arbitrages que l'État doit faire pour trouver un juste équilibre entre les intérêts du monde rural et la conservation de la biodiversité. Pour faire le point à ce sujet et examiner les pistes d'un éventuel consensus, une enquête sociologique a été menée auprès de 1 752 personnes : éleveurs, chasseurs, maires, agents publics et associations de protection de la nature.

Movements develop in coevolution with regimes and other actors in their environments. Movement trajectories evolve through stochastic processes and are constrained, but not determined, by structures. Coevolution provides a theoretical structure for organizing existing understandings of social movements and sharpening future research. Stochastic thinking is essential for recognizing the both the volatility and path dependence of collective action and its underlying structural constraints. Formal models of diffusion, adaptive learning, mutual reinforcement, and inter-actor competition are developed and compared with empirical protest series. Responses to exogenous reinforcement, mutual adaptation in which failure is as important as success, and inter-actor competition are the most plausible mechanisms to account for empirical patterns. Trajectories of action depend upon the number of discrete random actors. Overall, the analysis suggests that movement dynamics are shaped more by interactions with other actors than by processes internal to a movement, and that empirical analysis must be sensitive to the level of aggregation of the data.

Mit dem 3. Opferrechtsreformgesetz wurde für die Strafprozessordnung ein neues Instrument eingeführt. Ab dem 1. Januar 2017 haben nach der Strafprozessordnung § 406g besonders schutzbedürftige Ver-letzte einen Anspruch auf professionelle Begleitung und Betreuung während des gesamten Verfahrens, die sogenannte Psychosoziale Prozessbegleitung. Die Mehrheit Geflüchteter und der Verletzten mit Einwanderungsgeschichte ist von mehreren Gewalttaten betroffen, daher ist bei ihnen von einer vielfach erhöhten Vulnerabilität auszugehen. Ein Großteil der Gewalttaten wird von Betroffenen aus Scham, sowie aufgrund von sprachlichen Barrieren oder unsicherem Aufenthaltsstatus (d. h. struktureller Diskriminierung) und auch aus Unwissenheit über die eigenen Rechte und wegen Bedenken vor den Behörden (d. h. institutioneller Diskriminierung), nicht zur Anzeige gebracht. Aus diesem Grund bietet das ZENTRUM TEMPUS Bielefeld e.V. trans-kulturelle psychosoziale Beratung für Opfer von Gewalttaten/einer Straftat an. Basierend auf unseren Erfahrungen aus der Beratungsarbeit dort möchten wir in diesem Beitrag anhand des pädagogischen Konzeptes "Social Justice" (als spezifsches Gerechtigkeitsdenken, vgl. Weinbach 2006) Anregungen für die Praxis und Ansatz-punkte für die diskriminierungskritische intersektionale Weiterentwicklung der Qualitätsstandards Psychosozialer Prozessbegleitung geben.

The emphasis of this literature review is on conceptual issues rather than a review of empirical studies. The paper starts by addressing the question why the concept of resilience is particular and what value is added if such a perspective is adopted. Next, the historical context and evolvement of the research on resilience are briefly reviewed with a short overview of the range of research topics in the area. The third section discusses the definition of resilience and its main elements. Section four addresses the main criticisms of the resilience concept. Section five identifies areas for further research.

Shipping list no.: 2011-0274-P ; Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Reauthorization Act introduced as S. 2012 ; Includes bibliographical references ; Mode of access: Internet.

Reuse of record except for individual research requires license from Congressional Information Service, Inc. ; CIS Microfiche Accession Numbers: CIS 78 S261-69 ; Microfiche. ; Mode of access: Internet.

Social care workers benefit from multiple types of evidence to enhance citizen well-being, support their own well-being and improve social care services. Building capacity within social care to find, collect and use different forms of evidence is an international concern. The Developing Evidence Enriched Practice (DEEP) programme in Wales is informed by the values and aims of social pedagogy. It aspires to enhance both the generation and use of evidence in social care. To learn about what works in the programme, we conducted an evaluation based on contribution analysis that explored programme impacts between 2020 and 2023. Based on a co-produced theory of change the evaluation drew on exemplar cases, questionnaire responses, documentary evidence, process data and unsolicited feedback. There was evidence that the DEEP programme contributed to people better valuing and gaining a better understanding of different forms of evidence. Citizen voice could become more central in decision-making, and there were examples of practice, policy and research being informed by diverse evidence. Many people who attended the DEEP learning course enhanced their confidence and skills by using the DEEP approach and said that they would put their learning into practice. It was harder to evidence longer-term impacts and the sustainability of the approach. These findings suggest that there can be merit in developing capacity-building programmes informed by social pedagogy. Such programmes can be characterised as relational, holistic, practice-focused, multifaceted, contextualised and co-produced with intended beneficiaries.