Suchergebnisse

"June 1994"--Spine. ; Cover title. ; Includes bibliographical references (p. 96-107). ; Mode of access: Internet.

Alan Collins is to be congratulated for highlighting the role Gorbachev's strategy of Graduated Reciprocation in Tension Reduction (GRIT) played in ending the military conflict between East and West. By offering an alternative view to the conservative opinion that America's material strength forced the Soviets into submission, it suggests that statesmen caught in security dilemmas have real options and are not simply forced to compete for power. As a policy that fostered transparency which assisted the creation of security regimes, GRIT undoubtedly played a role in the way the military conflict ended. Yet the Cold War was not simply about the military balance. Collins' account of this period is restricted by his bias towards state-centric and rationalist explanations of state behaviour. He underestimates the role ideology played in ending the Cold War and as such only offers half a Cold War story. The influence of the US during this period, as a cautious agent of liberal individualism, is completely ignored, yet, as this reply demonstrates, it is crucial to understanding the way the US reciprocated Soviet policies. Moreover, if 'debate over what the Cold War was is part of the politics of deciding what the post-Cold War is', the significance of this criticism is not merely academic. The implication of Collins' unwritten assumption that state's identities are egoistic is that a security community based on a common identity is impossible. The lesson that the Cold War, as opposed to the military conflict, only ended when a common identity based on liberal individualism was instituted, suggests that a transatlantic security community including Russia was and still is a possibility.

Cover -- Series -- Title Page -- Copyright -- Dedication -- Contents -- Preface -- Introduction -- Chapter 1. How the Polygraph Does and Does Not Work -- Chapter 2. Truth to Remake Society -- Chapter 3. World War II, National Security, and the Search for Loyal Citizens -- Chapter 4. The Polygraph and the Specter of Totalitarianism Within -- Chapter 5. Truth and National Security in the American Cold War -- Chapter 6. Immeasurable Security: The Polygraph and the CIA -- Chapter 7. The Polygraph and the Problems of Deterrence -- Chapter 8. Congress, the Right to Privacy, and the Retrenchment of the Polygraph -- Epilogue -- Notes -- Index -- About the Author -- Back Cover

Manhood and American Political Culture in the Cold War explores the meaning of anxiety as expressed through the political and cultural language of the early cold war era. Cuordileone shows how the preoccupation with the soft, malleable American character reflected not only anti-Communism but acute anxieties about manhood and sexuality. Reading major figures like Arthur Schlesinger Jr., Adlai Stevenson, Joseph McCarthy, Norman Mailer, JFK, and many lesser known public figures, Cuordileone reveals how the era's cult of toughness shaped the political dynamics of the time and inspired a reinvention of the liberal as a cold warrior.

'The United States and Europe after the Cold War' by John W. Holmes is reviewed. A book review is presented of The United States and Europe after the Cold War by John W. Holmes.

To speak about emotions is to attempt to address a notoriously challenging and vast category of cultural existence, aking to undertaking an analysis of "the body" or "reason." But as contemporary work in cultural studies and poststructuralism has shown, undertaking explorations of the body and reason are extremely pressing and productive areas of critical inquiry. Culturalist approaches to emotions, however, have only recently begun to emerge as a distinct area of investigation. A useful entry point into the complexities of emotion as a sociocultural category is Raymond Williams' concept, structure of feeling.