International legal argument in the Permanent Court of International Justice: the rise of the international judiciary
In: Cambridge studies in international and comparative law
7025471 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Cambridge studies in international and comparative law
In: Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht: ZaöRV = Heidelberg journal of international law : HJIL, Band 72, Heft 2, S. 223-259
ISSN: 0044-2348
World Affairs Online
In: Washington University in St. Louis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 23-01-03
SSRN
In: International Politics and Institutions in Time, S. 251-273
In: Fairness in International Law and Institutions, S. 316-347
In: International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Band 59, Heft 4, S. 895–910
SSRN
In: Cambridge studies in international and comparative law 62
International environmental law has come of age, yet the global environment continues to deteriorate. The challenge of the twenty-first century is to reverse this process by ensuring that governments comply fully with their obligations, and progressively assume stricter duties to preserve the environment. This book is the first comprehensive examination of international environmental litigation. Analysing the spectrum of adjudicative bodies that are engaged in the resolution of environmental disputes, it offers a reappraisal of their relevance in contemporary contexts. The book critiques the contribution that arbitral awards and judicial decisions have made to the development of environmental law, and considers the looming challenges for international litigation. With its unique combination of scholarly analysis and practical discussion, this work is especially relevant to an era in which environmental matters are increasingly being brought before international jurisdictions, and will be of great interest to students and scholars engaged with this vital field
In: Yearbook of international humanitarian law, Band 12, S. 233-262
ISSN: 1574-096X
AbstractThe International Criminal Courts Round-Up reports on the most interesting judgements and decisions rendered by international(ized) criminal courts and tribunals during the reporting period. In addition, important developments within the various organs of the courts are highlighted, such as the appointment of new judges and significant amendments to the procedural rules of the courts. The Round-Up presently covers issues concerning the International Criminal Court, the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia.
In: Max Planck yearbook of United Nations law, S. 1-39
ISSN: 1875-7413
Abstract
Over the last decades, the participation of State and non-State actors (NSAs) in the process of international law-making has become one of the basic features of international law. As multifunctional actors, the role of international courts and tribunals (ICTs) encompasses the protection and development of the international community. Together with ICTs' role in the promotion, recognition and application of community interest norms, the growing participation of State and NSAs in international dispute settlement mechanisms also plays an increasingly important role in ensuring and facilitating compliance and enforcement of community interest norms. Whereas the non-party participation of State and NSAs has only very exceptionally been recognized, their influence in international dispute settlement cannot be ignored. By applying empirical research methodology for mapping the practice of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) concerning the participation of State and NSAs under the ICJ Statute and Rules of Court, this paper addresses the existing mechanisms of non-party participation in both contentious cases and advisory proceedings. There is no doubt that ICJ procedural law remains outdated and disconnected from the contemporary developments characterizing the international community nowadays. Broadening the possibilities for participation by State and NSAs would imply the recognition of the plurilateral nature of international disputes. In this context, the paper also discusses the challenges and possible alternatives for expanding participation via teleological interpretation of the ICJ Statute and potential amendments to the Rules of Court and Practice Directions.
In: APSA 2014 Annual Meeting Paper
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
Working paper
In: Leipziger Schriften zum Völkerrecht, Europarecht und ausländischen öffentlichen Recht Volume 23
In: Small wars & insurgencies, Band 24, Heft 2, S. 349-369
ISSN: 0959-2318
World Affairs Online
An increasing number of challenges against the activities and decisions of international organizations are brought before national courts. This book offers an overview of how different courts have dealt with these cases and an analysis of the legal framework which applies to them, identifying common ground across jurisdictions.