Suchergebnisse

First report was not printed for public use.--Information from U. S. Government printing office. ; Mode of access: Internet.

At head of title: 1927-31, 1939-45: State of New York; 1932-38, State of New York. Dept. of Health. Division of Cancer Control. ; Vols. for 1910/11-48 called 1st-38th. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Issued 1912-46 under an earlier form of the corporate name: State Institute for the Study of Malignant Diseases, reports for 1910/11-45. ; Issued 1918-40 in the series of Legislative documents of New York State Legislature.

An important sub-objective of the Lisbon Strategy states that there is a need to improve foreign language teaching at all levels of education throughout Europe. This is seen to be a key means of giving expression to the multilingual nature of the European Union. In the 21st century, foreign language competence and proficiency and intercultural understanding are no longer considered as optional but have become an essential part of being a citizen. Countries in the world have become more and more interdependent, and new technologies have erased many existing borders giving rise to an ever-increasing need for good communication skills in foreign languages. This has brought in turn new efforts aimed at improving foreign language education with many countries introducing well-articulated curriculum frameworks that motivate and guide the development of an effective system of foreign language education even at post-compulsory and at tertiary level. The same cannot be said, unfortunately, for Malta where the number of students studying foreign languages at post compulsory education is on the decline with the result that in the 3 most important institutions in Malta that offer tertiary education, the presence of foreign languages is negligible. This brings us to a very pertinent question. Do we need modern language graduates in a globalised world? Or better, do we need graduates who are also proficient in one or more foreign languages? ; peer-reviewed

This chapter addresses the perspective of the European Union as a Multi-Speed Europe, in which in a Balkan context, member states participate in common policies and choose the ones they are (or are not) willing and able to participate in. The integration experience witnesses a Multi-speed approach to European integration, as may be demonstrated in the cases of the European Monetary Union and the Schengen Agreement, in which not all the member states participate. The goal of this paper is to apply the Multi-speed model within the Balkan states – in the concrete cases of Macedonia, Greece, Bulgaria, Albania, Croatia, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Kosovo, Serbia and Montenegro, within the circles of integration, and in the process of European integration in general, thereby creating a model of Multi-Speed Balkans.

At head of title: Parliament of Tasmania. ; Suspended 1925/26-1928/29. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Issued by the Chief Inspector of Stock, ; by the Secretary of Agriculture and Chief Inspector of Stock, ; by the Agricultural Dept., -1909/10; by the Agricultural and Stock Dept., 1910/11-; by the Dept. of Agriculture, .