The Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights
In: European yearbook of minority issues, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 487-534
ISSN: 2211-6117
1062984 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: European yearbook of minority issues, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 487-534
ISSN: 2211-6117
In: 3 CAMBRIDGE J. INT'L. & COMP. L. 508 (2014).
SSRN
"This insightful book considers how the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) is faced with numerous challenges which emanate from authoritarian and populist tendencies arising across its member states. It argues that it is now time to reassess how the ECHR responds to such challenges to the protection of human rights in the light of its historical origins. Written by a group of established and emerging experts from diverse backgrounds, this book offers a fresh perspective on the questions and challenges facing the ECHR, bringing together different, and thus far isolated, strands of academic and political debate. Contributions combine historiographical insights with explorations of the current and pressing need for the ECHR to find a role for itself, especially in an environment where there is increased scepticism towards the idea of human rights protection. In particular, the critical conception of the Convention as an 'alarm bell mechanism' is examined and assessed in relation to its original goal to prevent authoritarian backsliding. The European Court of Human Rights: Current Challenges in Historical Perspective will be an important source of reference to academic researchers and students with an interest in human rights, international law and the law and politics of international organisations. It will also appeal to policymakers and legal practitioners due to its examination of pertinent legal and political issues that challenge international organisations"--
In: Case-law of the European Court of Human Rights 2
In: International journal of human rights, S. 1-26
ISSN: 1744-053X
In: Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Nis, Heft 68, S. 893-910
In: The Headscarf ControversySecularism and Freedom of Religion, S. 72-98
In: International journal of human rights, Band 18, Heft 7-8, S. 756-773
ISSN: 1744-053X
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Band 101, S. 424-427
ISSN: 2169-1118
In: Human rights law journal: HRLJ, Band 17, S. 401-404
ISSN: 0174-4704
Suggests criteria for the selection of judicial candidates.
In: European Court of Human Rights. Publications. Series A Vol. 19
In: Law and religion
In: Brill research perspectives
"Religious courts have been part of the European legal landscape for centuries. Almost all churches and religious communities have their own judicial systems, often composed of courts or tribunals ordered hierarchically. The aim of this book is to present cases from the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, in which a religious court was involved at the stage of domestic proceedings. The twelve cases in question originate from a number of European States, in which the applicants belonged to many denominations, although predominantly Christian. The Court of Human Rights has mainly been concerned with religious courts in terms of compliance with the requirement for a fair hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal under Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights and has come to various conclusions. The most recent judgment from September 2017, Nagy v. Hungary, and in particular many associated dissenting opinions, demonstrate that the matter is worthy of study, particularly in the contemporary context of religious freedom"
SSRN
Working paper
The exceptionality of America's Supreme Court has long been conventional wisdom. But the United States Supreme Court is no longer the only one changing the landscape of public rights and values. Over the past thirty years, the European Court of Human Rights has developed an ambitious, American-style body of law. Unheralded by the mass press, this obscure tribunal in Strasbourg, France has become, in many ways, the Supreme Court of Europe. Michael Goldhaber introduces American audiences to the judicial arm of the Council of Europe--a group distinct from the European Union, and much larger--whose.