THE CURRENT INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL SYSTEM IS DOMINATED BY THE ECONOMIC CRISIS CAUSED BY GROWING INFLATION ACCELERATED BY THE INCREASING OF THE COSTS OF RAW MATERIALS AND OIL. AMERICAN POLICY WITHIN THIS CONTEXT IS AIMED AT TRYING TO MONITOR THE CHANGE IN THE WORLD ORDER. AS FAR AS EUROPE IS CONCERNED THERE ARE NO STATEMENTS OF PARTNERSHIP ANY LONGER.
The belief that globalization has resulted in a multipolar global village transcending political, territorial, economic and socio-cultural particularities seems to be mistaken. On the contrary, it has been a convenient metaphor for the US to promote its own political and economic thinking on all nations at the expense of their cultural, social, economic and political diversity through the instrument of Transnational Corporations (TNCs) and the process of homogenization of production, labour and trade. The developing countries have remained captive to the wishes of these US-based corporations. Globalization has not meant more democratization, freedom, independence or emergence of a multipolar world and regional powers. Instead, it has become an expedient euphemism for the US to decide the economy of the entire globe by its own domestic imperatives of providing a luxurious life style to its own citizens. The disintegration of Soviet Union and the end of Cold War, instead of ushering in a new world order, has resulted in the emergence of the US as a great leviathan, which by virtue of its own military prowess feels free to spread auits own liberal market economy binding all the nations of the world to all its nuances at the cost of their independence and sovereignty. American foreign policy behaviour with respect to Afghanistan, Iraq and global climate change negotiations is a testimony to this fact.
The production of arms is systemically based in the dynamic of international economic growth. Major arms exporters, primarily northern industrial states, are locked into a structure that retards economic development worldwide. Unable to remedy internal structural difficulties, these nations export, through arms trade, inequality and injustice to Third World nations. This arms trade, in turn, serves to preserve the political and economic predominance the northern industrial states now enjoy in the global hierarchy. In analyzing the potential for a New International Economic Order, greater emphasis should be placed on the role played by the war system-including arms trade-in inhibiting the realization of the NIEO's stated goals. To this end the complex interplay between the war system and the political economies of those states most actively engaged in arms trade is examined. Finally, alternative futures are explored, based on an emerging multipolar world, and which entail a substantial reduction in the level of global armaments.
Japan experienced a remarkable growth in international finance, through a series of liberalization measures in the 1980s. However, her position in the global financial system is still limited, as the reserve currency share of yen illustrates. Why does such a contrast exist? Historical comparison with Britain and the United States as well as extensive data provide a key to answer the question.
Verfügbarkeit an Ihrem Standort wird überprüft
Dieses Buch ist auch in Ihrer Bibliothek verfügbar:
Objective: Need of a new economic model has been realized at the international level, as numerous and significant flaws has appeared in both two systems capitalism and socialism, which are becoming a great cause for economic crises in almost every economy of the word, in this regard this study has been carried out on the redefining Islamic economics as a new model, that how it can take out those problems and flaws which has appeared in both structure. Methodology: Islamic economic system doesn't emphasize only on the economic variables it also considers the social variables which has been neglected by both previously and currently practicing systems (socialism and capitalism).current study is a comparative analysis of all said systems. Findings: It has been also observed that in spite of having great strength to winkle out all the economic problems, without interest how we are able to get the profit and what different types of new loan system that is RIBA free and helpful for getting the good profit. Practical Implication: In Islamic economic system the private property is being debatable. Government or state should be involved in only condition if market is failed to provide public good and education.
Die historische Entwicklung der internationalen Einbindung Chiles und die traditionellen Leitlinien der chilenischen Außenpolitik sind stark von der "Quasi-Insellage" des Landes geprägt. Unter der Militärdiktatur gestalteten sich die Beziehungen zum Ausland unerwartet konfliktiv und erreichten bis Ende der 1980er Jahre einen fast beispiellosen Stand der Entfremdung und des gegenseitigen Misstrauens. Die Wiedereingliederung in das internationale System in den 1990er Jahren hatte zwei wichtige Determinanten: den Wechsel vom autoritären Regime zur Demokratie und eine Außenwirtschaftspolitik der ausgehandelten, wechselseitigen Marktöffnung. (ICE2)