The southern Sudan today [political and social conditions]
In: African affairs: the journal of the Royal African Society, Band 62, S. 274-279
ISSN: 0001-9909
146934 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: African affairs: the journal of the Royal African Society, Band 62, S. 274-279
ISSN: 0001-9909
In: The Economic Journal, Band 35, Heft 138, S. 296
In: Teaching sociology: TS, Band 9, Heft 2, S. 211
ISSN: 1939-862X
In: The review of black political economy: analyzing policy prescriptions designed to reduce inequalities, Band 6, Heft 1, S. 59-71
ISSN: 1936-4814
In: The journal of psychology: interdisciplinary and applied, Band 70, Heft 1, S. 69-76
ISSN: 1940-1019
In: Latin American perspectives: a journal on capitalism and socialism, Band 11, S. 3-136
ISSN: 0094-582X
In: Journal of peace research, Band 10, Heft 1-2, S. 37-49
ISSN: 0022-3433
If peace is regarded as a positive force, viewed from the postulate of social justice, then peace research does more than merely obey preventive demands for models of conflict-regulation. Rather, it may be defined as a society-oriented developmental theory with the aim of a new planning science directed toward domestic politics. It studies political socialization, develops models for learning stages, & creates conflict-activation plans for given social institutions. If such a program is to be implemented, detailed empirical case studies will be needed, & are presented as abstracts. Concerning the system-transforming effect of citizens' initiatives: if amends for the lack of opportunity to participate in the production sphere are made in the recreation sphere, then becoming involved in this sphere will affect the whole system. This politicizing is a process that comes about through various stages of learning. It is not the productive sphere, but the reproductive sphere that yields itself to opening up conflict & action areas. Modified HA.
In: Foreign affairs, Band 35, S. 620-630
ISSN: 0015-7120
In: Economica, Band 26, Heft 103, S. 270
In: Ankara Üniversitesi SBF dergisi, Band 32, Heft 1, S. 1
ISSN: 1309-1034
In: International journal of social welfare 11.2002, Suppl.
Almost a decade ago, in June 2000, the Canadian Human Rights Act Review Panel conducted a comprehensive review of the Canadian Human Rights Act [CHRA] and recommended that "social condition" be added as a prohibited ground of discrimination. Since then, no action has been taken to implement this recommendation, despite calls for action from international bodies, political actors, human rights agencies and organizations, and academic commentators to provide protections from discrimination for those suffering from social and economic disadvantage. The authors analyze the experiences at the provincial level with socio-economic grounds of discrimination, jurisprudential developments under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms related to claims based on socio-economic disadvantage, the broader proposal of incorporating justiciable social and economic rights into Canadian law, and the range of arguments both for and against recognizing social condition as a prohibited ground of discrimination. In the end, the authors recommend a feasible and practical means for adding social condition to the Canadian Human Rights Act so that it will provide predictability for administrators, adjudicators and respondents, as well as sufficient flexibility to reflect the multi-faceted and intersectional experience of discrimination of human rights claimants. While socio-economic inequality continues to be a significant and pressing problem in need of a multi-pronged and comprehensive solution, the addition of the ground of social condition to the CHRA will be one more tool in advancing the rights and interests of those on the very margins of Canadian society.This paper was co-authored with Natasha Kim, Dalhousie University.
BASE
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 437, S. 62-73
ISSN: 0002-7162
Many prominent health experts now assert that major improvements in the health of the American people must come from individual efforts to alter unhealthy personal habits & lifestyles rather than through medical services & technology. But it does not necessarily follow that a more ethical & feasible national health policy would focus primarily on exhorting Americans to mobilize their individual willpower to change to more healthful personal habits. In determining the nature of such a policy, three points are vital: (1) the "health & individual responsibility" argument may overestimate health benefits of personal habit changes, (2) the same argument tends to overlook or misconstrue the nature of societal constraints on individual will, failing to specify the sociological conditions under which millions can change their lives, & the role social conditions play in maintaining unhealthy behavior, & (3) the focus on individual decision making deemphasizes the role of collective efforts in securing higher health standards. A health policy that promotes curbing unhealthy habits & encourages healthy ones through societal action is more ethical & feasible than one focusing on "health as individual responsibility." Modified HA.
In: Final Report for the Canadian Human Rights Commission, 2009
SSRN