The Dejudicialization of International Politics?
In: International Studies Quarterly, Forthcoming
190 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International Studies Quarterly, Forthcoming
SSRN
Working paper
In: Sravnitel noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie, Band 127, Heft 6, S. 13-35
In: Virginia Journal of International Law, Forthcoming
SSRN
In: Ginsburg, Tom, and Eric Alston. "Playing for constitutional time: Interim constitutions and transitional provisions." The Timing of Lawmaking (2017): 110
SSRN
In: University of Chicago Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper No. 817
SSRN
Working paper
In: Asian journal of law and society, Band 3, Heft 1, S. 1-15
ISSN: 2052-9023
AbstractThis introduction to the special issue on Buddhism and law lays out an agenda for the socio-legal study of contemporary Buddhism. We identify lacunae in the current literature and call for further work on four themes: the relations between monastic legal practice and state law; the formations of Buddhist constitutionalism; Buddhist legal activism and Buddhist-interest litigation; and Buddhist moral critiques of law. We argue that this agenda is important for advancing Buddhist studies and for the comparative study of law and legal institutions.
In: Journal of democracy, Band 27, Heft 3, S. 69-82
ISSN: 1045-5736
World Affairs Online
In: Journal of democracy, Band 27, Heft 3, S. 69-82
ISSN: 1086-3214
In: Asian Journal of Law and Society 3:1-16 (2016)
SSRN
Working paper
In: This is a draft version of an essay that appears in the July 2016 issue of the Journal of Democracy"
SSRN
In: Pp. 1-20 in Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes, edited by Tom Ginsburg and Alberto Simpser (Cambridge University Press, 2014)
SSRN
Working paper
In: Journal of Law and Courts, Band 2, S. 187-217
SSRN
Working paper
In: University of Chicago Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper No. 682
SSRN
Working paper
In: Journal of democracy, Band 25, Heft 1, S. 116-130
ISSN: 1086-3214
What aims should guide a new constitution's drafters? Aspirational homilies about the rule of law, human rights, or democracy aside, there remains a surprising dearth of tools with which to gauge the success or failure of a constitution. We suggest four mid-range metrics for constitution-making: the legitimation of a new state; the channeling of political conflict; the dampening of agency costs from representational government; and the creation of national public goods. We apply these metrics to the 2004 Afghan constitution, arguing that it has had some modest successes in some areas, while failing in others.
In: Verfassung und Recht in Übersee: VRÜ = World comparative law : WCL, Band 46, Heft 1, S. 112-113
ISSN: 0506-7286