Suchergebnisse
Filter
145 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
SSRN
Working paper
Introduction: What Is Populist Nationalism and Why Does It Matter?
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 81, Heft 2, S. 707-711
ISSN: 1468-2508
Introduction: What Is Populist Nationalism and Why Does It Matter?
In: The Journal of Politics, Band 81
SSRN
Against Secrecy: The Social Cost of International Dispute Settlement
In: 45 Yale Journal of International Law, 2017, Forthcoming
SSRN
SSRN
Working paper
Political science research on international law: the state of the field
In: American journal of international law, Band 106, Heft 1, S. 47-97
ISSN: 0002-9300
World Affairs Online
Political Science Research on International Law: The State of the Field
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 106, Heft 1, S. 47-97
ISSN: 2161-7953
The discipline of political science has developed an active research program on the development, operation, spread, and impact of international legal norms, agreements, and institutions. Meanwhile, a growing number of public international lawyers have developed an interest in political science research and methods. For more than two decades, scholars have been calling for international lawyers and political scientists to collaborate, and have suggested possible frameworks for doing so. Some prominent collaborations are under way—sharing research methods and insights.
Emergency and escape: explaining derogations from human rights treaties
In: International organization, Band 65, Heft 4, S. 673-707
ISSN: 0020-8183
World Affairs Online
Political Science Research on International Law: The State of the Field
In: The American Journal of International Law, Band 106, Heft 1 (January 2012)
SSRN
Working paper
Network Analysis for International Relations
In: International organization, Band 63, Heft 3, S. 559-592
ISSN: 1531-5088
International relations research has regarded networks as a particular mode of organization, distinguished from markets or state hierarchies. In contrast, network analysis permits the investigation and measurement of network structures—emergent properties of persistent patterns of relations among agents that can define, enable, and constrain those agents. Network analysis offers both a toolkit for identifying and measuring the structural properties of networks and a set of theories, typically drawn from contexts outside international relations, that relate structures to outcomes. Network analysis challenges conventional views of power in international relations by defining network power in three different ways: access, brokerage, and exit options. Two issues are particularly important to international relations: the ability of actors to increase their power by enhancing and exploiting their network positions, and the fungibility of network power. The value of network analysis in international relations has been demonstrated in precise description of international networks, investigation of network effects on key international outcomes, testing of existing network theory in the context of international relations, and development of new sources of data. Partial or faulty incorporation of network analysis, however, risks trivial conclusions, unproven assertions, and measures without meaning. A three-part agenda is proposed for future application of network analysis to international relations: import the toolkit to deepen research on international networks; test existing network theories in the domain of international relations; and test international relations theories using the tools of network analysis.
International Organizations Count
In: The journal of conflict resolution: journal of the Peace Science Society (International), Band 52, Heft 2, S. 175-188
ISSN: 1552-8766
This special issue seeks to move forward the development of an empirical research agenda that takes seriously the complexity of how international organizations (IOs) function and the need to study that complexity at all levels of analysis by using robust research tools. We advocate for a broad empirical research approach that molds and sharpens theories about IOs by conducting systematic tests in large-sample environments. Two themes create a common thread throughout this issue. First, shifting the focus from whether IOs matter to how they work requires acknowledgment of the contingency of cause and effect. A second common thread lies in the authors' treatment of IO membership as an aggregate phenomenon—that is, as a set of institutions and relationships evolving over time and with many members rather than as a single organization.
International Organizations Count
In: The journal of conflict resolution: journal of the Peace Science Society (International), Band 52, Heft 2, S. 175-188
ISSN: 0022-0027, 0731-4086
Network Analysis for International Relations
In: International Organization, Band 63, Heft 3
SSRN
International Human Rights Law and the Politics of Legitimation: Repressive States and Human Rights Treaties
In: International Sociology, January 2008, Vol. 23(1): 115-141
SSRN
International Organizations Count: What Statistics Tell Us About IOs
In: Journal of Conflict Resolution, Band 52 Number 2
SSRN