From the incoming editors: A leading International Relations journal with a Nordic touch
In: Cooperation and conflict: journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, Band 59, Heft 2, S. 131-134
ISSN: 1460-3691
96 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Cooperation and conflict: journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, Band 59, Heft 2, S. 131-134
ISSN: 1460-3691
This chapter identifies and discusses some of the ways in which kinship may be of use to IR scholars. The chapter offers examples of how kinship relations have manifested themselves historically in international relations, seeking to demonstrate how blood kinship from the beginning has been accompanied, reinforced and challenged by metaphorical kinship – that is, how certain non-blood related relations in or via practice come to be treated as kin, with the duties, obligations and expectations that entails. ; acceptedVersion
BASE
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 67, Heft 1, S. 115-136
ISSN: 1891-1757
Carlsnaes, W.: Teorier om politiska allianser i internationell politik. - S. 9-14 Skogan, J. K.: Norske alliansetradisjoner. - S. 15-22 Graeger, N.: Norge, USA og de nye NATO. - S. 23-30 Rieker, P.: EU og Norden som militaerallianser og alliansepartnere for Norge. - S. 31-36 Haugevik, K. M.: Internasjonale sikkerhetsorganisasjoner som kontekst. - S. 37-44 Torjesen, S.: Hva med Russland? - S. 45-52
World Affairs Online
Nordic states' partnership choices in security and defence are more aligned than they were a decade ago. When Danish, Finnish, Norwegian and Swedish government officials now identify key security challenges and partners, and reflect on the potential for Nordic cooperation, they have the same reference points and use similar wording. Since 2014, the toolbox for Nordic defence cooperation has also solidified and different formal affiliations with NATO and the EU seem to matter less than before. Furthermore, an array of multi- and minilateral cooperation structures have emerged across and beyond the EU and NATO, expanding the possibilities for Nordic cooperation under a larger Euro-Atlantic umbrella. However, two limitations remain: First, Nordic security and defence cooperation still remains subordinate to and a supplement rather than an alternative to NATO. Second, putting Nordic response mechanisms into practice remains dependent not only on the context and issue at stake, but also on the political appetite of the individual Nordic governments to choose a Nordic solution. ; publishedVersion
BASE
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 62, Heft 3, S. 435-487
ISSN: 1891-1757