The Evolving International Judiciary
In: Annual Review of Law and Social Science, Band 7, S. 387-415
13849 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Annual Review of Law and Social Science, Band 7, S. 387-415
SSRN
In: Russian Rule in Samarkand 1868-1910, S. 244-285
In: Australian journal of political science: journal of the Australasian Political Studies Association, Band 37, Heft 1, S. 131-142
ISSN: 1036-1146
In: Indian journal of public administration, Band 45, Heft 3, S. 562-566
ISSN: 2457-0222
In: Social scientist: monthly journal of the Indian School of Social Sciences, Band 2, Heft 4, S. 65
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 10, Heft 3, S. 441-463
ISSN: 1468-2508
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 10, S. 441-463
ISSN: 0022-3816
In: National municipal review, Band 29, Heft 11, S. 736-742
In: Political science quarterly: a nonpartisan journal devoted to the study and analysis of government, politics and international affairs ; PSQ, Band 18, Heft 3, S. 512-530
ISSN: 1538-165X
In: Proceedings of the Law and Society Annual Meeting: Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany, July 25-28, 2007
SSRN
Working paper
Professor Suli delivered the Fifth Annual Herbert L. Bernstein Memorial Lecture in Comparative Law in 2006 and this article is based on his remarks, with a foreword by Jonathan Ocko. The article is included in the inaugural volume of CICLOPs thatcollects the first six Bernstein lectures. In responding to Sending Law to the Countryside, Professor Frank Upham levied a number of criticisms against Professor Zhu Suli's book. Of particular importance was Upham's criticism concerning a lack of attention to the role of politics and political power in the Chinese legal system. Suli finds this criticism to be extremely important because it reflects what Suli believes to be an inherent bias against and misunderstanding of the Chinese legal system and legal culture by Western comparative legal theorists. Suli asserts that this criticism is misguided because it overlooks the vast differences between legal thought in the vein of Western ideology versus the Chinese strain of legal thought. Arguing that Upham approaches Chinese law from a bias created by an inherently Western ideology concerning law, Suli argues that the culture and governmental framework of China blurs the traditional Western lines drawn between law and politics. By illustrating the weakness of Upham's criticism through showing the particular methods that the Chinese legal system uses to achieve the goal of social order, Suli demonstrates the need for caution when engaging in comparative legal scholarship across two vastly different cultural and legal systems.
BASE
In: Critical review: a journal of politics and society, Band 19, Heft 2-3, S. 345-357
ISSN: 1933-8007
In: Critical review: an interdisciplinary journal of politics and society, Band 19, Heft 2, S. 345-358
ISSN: 0891-3811
In: THE PSYCHOLOGY OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING, David Klein & Gregory Mitchell, eds., Oxford University Press, 2008
SSRN
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/nyp.33433006889202
"In the legislature of the state of Alabama, Regular Session 1915, .Containing report of Special Judiciary Commmittee of the Legislature, with a minority report; also House Bills 781 to 849, and resolutions by said committee." -- at head of title. ; Caption title. ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE