The church in Poland and its political influence
In: Journal of international affairs, Band 36, Heft 2, S. 317-328
ISSN: 0022-197X
91564 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of international affairs, Band 36, Heft 2, S. 317-328
ISSN: 0022-197X
World Affairs Online
In: Asia Pacific community: a quarterly review, Heft 12, S. 62-74
ISSN: 0387-1711
Aus japanischer Sicht
World Affairs Online
In: American behavioral scientist: ABS, Band 58, Heft 7, S. 859-868
In: Naval War College review, Band 54, Heft 1, S. 170-172
ISSN: 0028-1484
In: Problems of post-communism, Band 46, Heft 4, S. 33-41
ISSN: 1557-783X
In: Administrative science quarterly: ASQ ; dedicated to advancing the understanding of administration through empirical investigation and theoretical analysis, Band 39, Heft 1, S. 176-179
ISSN: 0001-8392
In: Global affairs, Band 8, Heft 1, S. 12
ISSN: 0886-6198
In: American politics quarterly, Band 19, Heft 4, S. 396-416
ISSN: 1532-673X
This article develops an analytical model of partisan redistricting (gerrymandering) in which control of state government is used to promote party and incumbent goals. The model suggests that elected officials confront a tradeoff between margins of victory for their party's House candidates and the number of seats captured. Aregression analysis of 1982 House election results provides empirical support for the model. The findings indicate that a complete reversal of party control of state government prior to redistricting would make it possible for the dominant party to gain 6% to 7% additional House seats, and would permit it to protect between 17% and 25% of its candidates from significant challenges from the other party. Studies which attempt to measure the presence of gerrymandering by concentrating on one measure or the other, but not both, will underestimate the effectiveness of redistricting as a partisan tool.
In: American politics quarterly, Band 19, S. 396-416
ISSN: 0044-7803
Estimates effectiveness of partisan redistricting using a regression analysis of the 1982 US House election results.
In: Middle Eastern affairs, Band 1, S. 142-149
ISSN: 0544-0483
In: Political science quarterly: PSQ ; the journal public and international affairs, Band 108, Heft 1, S. 202
ISSN: 0032-3195
In: Journal of Economic Surveys, Band 28, Heft 1, S. 17-35
SSRN
In: International Organisations Research Journal, Band 11, Heft 4, S. 77-105
SSRN
Working paper
In: Journal of peace research, Band 60, Heft 5, S. 868-876
ISSN: 1460-3578
This article introduces a dataset on the covert use of social media to influence politics by promoting propaganda, advocating controversial viewpoints, and spreading disinformation. Influence efforts (IEs) are defined as: (i) coordinated campaigns by a state, or the ruling party in an autocracy, to impact one or more specific aspects of politics at home or in another state, (ii) through media channels, including social media, by (iii) producing content designed to appear indigenous to the target state. Our data draw on more than 1,000 media reports and 500 research articles/reports to identify IEs, track their progress, and classify their features. The data cover 78 foreign influence efforts (FIEs) and 25 domestic influence efforts (DIEs) – in which governments targeted their own citizens – against 51 different countries from 2011 through early 2021. The Influence Effort dataset measures covert information campaigns by state actors, facilitating research on contemporary statecraft.