Suchergebnisse

This study explores how the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic influenced family routines, relationships and technology use (smartphones and tablet computers) among families with infants. Infancy is known to be an important period for attachment security and future child development, and a time of being susceptible to changes within and outside of the family unit. A qualitative design using convenience sampling was employed. A total of 30 mothers in Perth, Western Australia participated in semi-structured interviews by audio or video call. All mothers were parents of infants aged 9 to 15 months old. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed, and data were analysed using thematic analysis to code and identify themes in an inductive manner. Families described staying home and stopping all external activities. Three themes relating to family interactions and wellbeing were found: enhanced family relationships; prompted reflection on family schedules; and increased parental stress. Two themes related to family device use were found: enabled connections to be maintained; and source of disrupted interactions within the family unit. Overall, participants described more advantages than downsides of device use during COVID-19. Findings will be of value in providing useful information for families, health professionals and government advisors for use during future pandemic-related restrictions.

In the seventies the biopsychosocial model increased interest in the analysis of the patient-physician relationship. Studies have shown that relationship focuses on the patient's self-determination correlates with an improvement in compliance to treatment and perceived satisfaction of the patient. However, the effectiveness of the patient-physician dyad is influenced by changes in the cultural and health context. Isolation and stigma that characterize health conditions from pandemics, contribute to the development of Burnout of health professionals Physician and anxiety for patients by influencing their communication and thus reducing their symmetry between the actors involved and the time spent listening. More investments in healthcare, more training for professionals, as well as an increase in policies aimed at promoting health for the community, contribute to the improvement of care. ; Negli anni settanta il modello bio-psico-sociale ha favorito un aumento d'interesse per l'analisi della relazione terapeutica. Gli studi hanno infatti dimostrato che una relazione che pone al centro il principio di autodeterminazione del paziente è correlata a un miglioramento dell'aderenza alle cure e della soddisfazione dallo stesso percepita. L'efficacia della diade paziente-terapeuta è però anche influenzata da cambiamenti nel contesto culturale e sanitario. Isolamento e stigma che caratterizzano le condizioni sanitarie da pandemie, contribuiscono allo sviluppo di Bournout per gli operatori e di stati di ansia per i pazienti influenzano la comunicazione duale e riducono pertanto la simmetricità tra gli attori coinvolti e il tempo dedicato all'ascolto. Maggiori investimenti nella sanità, incremento della formazione alla relazione e alla comunicazione per i professionisti, nonché incremento di politiche volte alla promozione della salute per la collettività, contribuiscono a migliorare il percorso di cura.

UK: У статті обґрунтовується необхідність використання не тільки традиційних методів навчання, але і нових, які відповідали б запитам сучасного покоління студентства. Зроблено наголос, що в умовах глобалізації виникають зовсім нові типи комунікацій, способів збереження й передачі інформації, зв'язків і взаємин у людських співтовариствах, інші форми взаємодії різних культурних традицій. Висвітлюються зв'язки між гастрономічною культурою та процесами громадянської ідентифікації і формуванням ключових компетентностей: політично-соціальних, полікультурних, комунікативних, інформаційних, самоосвітніх. Авторами підкреслюється, що для фахівців сфери гостинності володіння саме такими компетентностями стане визначальним в успішній професійній реалізації. Визначено, що найважливішими компетентностями для студентів Мелітополя як міста етнокультурного розмаїття є полікультурність і комунікативність. Отже, на думку авторів, ефективним способом для розвитку цих компетентностей є залучення студентів до роботи в громадських організаціях за професійним спрямуванням. Саме з цією метою була створена громадська організація «Інтеркультурне гастрономічне коло». На прикладі проведення різноманітних гастрокультурних заходів, показано, що відродження традицій, а також безпосереднє спілкування студентів з носіями національної культури сприятиме кращій самореалізації студентів спеціальності «Готельнуресторанна справа» в професійній діяльності. EN: The article substantiates the need to use not only traditional teaching methods, but also new ones that would meet the needs of the modern students generation. It is emphasized that in the conditions of globalization, completely new types of communication, ways of storing and transmitting information, connections and relationships in human communities, other forms of interaction of different cultural traditions are emerging. The links between gastronomic culture and processes of civic identification and the formation of key competences: political, social, multicultural, communicative, informational, self-educational are highlighted. The authors emphasize that for specialists in the hospitality field, possession of such competencies will be crucial in successful professional realization. It is determined that the most important competences for students of Melitopol as a city of ethno-cultural diversity are multiculturalism and communication. Therefore, according to the authors, an effective way to develop these competencies is to involve students in working in public organizations by a professional direction. It was for this purpose that the public organization "Intercultural Gastronomic Circle" was created. On the example of various gastronomic events, it is shown that the revival of traditions, as well as the direct communication of students with carriers of national culture will contribute to better self-realization in professional activity of students of the specialty "Hotel and Restaurant business".

La ponencia se constituye desde un enfoque teórico-práctico poniendo el énfasis en la cotidianeidad de las familias que atraviesan situaciones de extrema pobreza abordadas desde la experiencia como integrantes del grupo de investigación "Salud y Desarrollo de niños, niñas y sus familias". Tiene como objetivo analizar y repensar la relación profesional en el contexto socio-histórico local y nacional, partiendo de puntualizar los conceptos necesidad, capacidades, cuestión social, territorio y vida cotidiana. Asimismo, identificar cuestiones a nivel institucional respecto de los derechos de las familias en situaciones de pobreza que generen interrogantes en función del cumplimiento de los mismos. Por otra parte, problematizar las prácticas profesionales diarias desde un enfoque multidimensional basado en establecimiento de relaciones profesionales confiables, enmarcadas en los derechos ciudadanos y en la responsabilidad del Estado. Para finalizar, se presentarán conclusiones que intenten lograr ser reflexiones disparadoras para la formación de grado y capacitación profesional permanente ; The paper is based on the experience as members of the research group "Health and Development of children and their families". It emphasizes the daily life of those families living in a situation of extreme poverty adopting a theoretical-practical approach. Its aim is to analyze and reevaluate the professional relationship in the local and national sociohistorical context, starting with necessity, capacity, social issue, territory and daily life. Furthermore, identify issues at the institutional level regarding the rights of families in situations of poverty that generate questions depending on their compliance. On the other hand, it problematizes the daily professional practices from a multidimensional approach based on the establishment of reliable professional relationships, framed in the citizen rights and in the responsibility of the State. Lastly, there will be presented conclusions that try to trigger reflections for the formation of degree and permanent qualified training

For several decades, working-class employees have been forgotten by policy makers and society more generally. This notion is further exacerbated in the organizational studies literature, where research mostly focuses on professional employees. In the current study, we seek to rectify this omission by examining how the experience of working-class employees has changed over time. We use a nationally representative sample of 35,771 U.S. employees collected between 1972 and 2018 as part of the repeated cross-sections of the General Social Survey Results suggest a growing disparity between working-class and middle/upper-class employees, with working-class employees reporting lower levels of financial satisfaction and higher levels of work exhaustion compared to middle/upper-class employees. Moreover, these discrepancies have increased over time, suggesting that this population of employees has indeed been forgotten.

This essay focuses on the Jamaican poet, dramatist, and broadcaster Una Marson (1905–65) and her turbulent career at the BBC between 1939 and 1946. Drawing on a range of unpublished archival sources, including files recently vetted and released for research since the publication of Delia Jarrett-Macauley's authoritative biography of Marson in 1998, the essay has two primary aims. First, to recover in greater detail and in more holistic terms than has previously been possible the personal story of Marson's professional relationships at the corporation. Second, to pursue what the director of Empire Services described as the "jealousies," "dissentions," and "rivalry" that Marson's appointment provoked during a relatively neglected period of black metropolitan cultural production in the early 1940s.

Many theories have aimed to chart lesbian, gay and bisexual identity development. These include traditional developmental models as well as newer approaches designed to capture a more fluid, multidimensional trajectory, both of which have tended to neglect the role of intersectional identities, context and individual variation in lesbian identity development. This study used inductive research methods, informed by grounded theory, to examine lesbian identity development in life narrative interviews with four lesbian scholar-activists from different national and racial backgrounds. The women's narratives suggest that a dynamic, non-linear, and contextualized representation of sexual identity development may more accurately describe lesbian identity development in terms of intersecting identities, national and local contexts, and personal and professional relationships.

In a public child welfare agency, 6 children were recruited for a pilot qualitative study about foster children's transitions from birth homes to out-of-home care. Recruitment was protracted and in-depth and involved contact with children, birth parents, and foster parents. While conducting qualitative research interviews with the children, knowledge was gained about the impact of recruitment-generated bias on such interviews, a topic about which there appears to be no prior literature. Detailed vignettes illustrate how such bias can constrict the researcher's ability to understand foster children's communications. The impact of recruitment-generated bias on the researcher's professional relationships is identified. Suggestions to help researchers counter recruitment-generated bias and ideas for further study of recruitment-generated bias are offered.

Objective: To describe the development and validation of the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale (STSS), a 17-item instrument designed to measure intrusion, avoidance, and arousal symptoms associated with indirect exposure to traumatic events via one's professional relationships with traumatized clients. Method: A sample of 287 licensed social workers completed a mailed survey containing the STSS and other relevant survey items. Results: Evidence was found for reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, and factorial validity. Conclusions: The STSS fills a need for reliable and valid instruments specifically designed to measure the negative effects of social work practice with traumatized populations. The instrument may be used to undertake empirical investigation into the prevention and amelioration of secondary traumatic stress among social work practitioners.

SUMMARY. nderstanding inter‐personal communication is no easy task and seems particularly uncertain when adults are talking to children. The authors set out to identify how children perceive what adults say to them by seeking to understand the nature of children's knowledge about adults in general. A study of 300 children, aged 4–14 was carried out to ascertain the types of response children gave at different ages to a standard set of questions in conversation. The authors conclude that as children grow older they move from anecdotal, through physical and social, to psychological responses. They conclude this greater understanding of the way children, in particular adolescents, perceive adults could have a very positive effect on professional relationships with young people

Nature conservation policies are founded on the mobilization of numerous scientists in multipleorganizations at different scales. In France, the scientific councils of protected areas are propitious places tostudy the relationships between science, society and nature. Participants in these councils confront theirknowledge, disciplines, professional points of view and representations to negotiate nature managementpractices. But these organizations were so far surprisingly little known. Drawing on science studies and thesociology of professional groups, this thesis proposes an ethnographic approach to analyze the effects ofinterprofessional relationships in different science regimes. The methodology combines ethnography ofalpine protected areas, quantitative surveys and a work on images and videos.The thesis proposes an overview of the scientific councils' organizations and missions in the sector ofenvironmental public action in order to understand their place in the expertise field. It documents the onstageand backstage role of these organizations in the making of nature conservation policies. It thendescribes the construction of interprofessional collectives at the interface between knowledge and action,between shifting boundaries. The development of an active relational context forms complex interactionalmodes oscillating between expertise and collaboration, between proximities and distances. Therelationships between scientists and practitioners produce adjustments to preserve the distance betweenscience and action and the impermeability of their boundary. Finally, the thesis invites to think about thepossible conjunction of different science regimes in order to open expertise processes to other kinds ofknowledge and legitimacy. ; Les politiques de la nature reposent sur la mobilisation massive de scientifiques au sein d'instances multiples et variées, oeuvrant à toutes les échelles. Dans les soupentes de l'action publique, des acteur·rices confrontent leurs savoirs, leurs traditions disciplinaires, leurs pratiques professionnelles et leurs représentations pour négocier des façons de « gérer la nature ».En France, les conseils scientifiques des espaces naturels protégés sont des lieux privilégiés pour étudier l'évolution des rapports entre natures, sciences et sociétés. Ils étaient pourtant jusqu'à présent méconnus. Articulant sociologie des sciences et sociologie des groupes professionnels, cette thèse analyse les effets des relations interprofessionnelles qui se tissent au gré des rencontres dans ces instances et à la conjonction de différents régimes de sciences en société. La méthode mobilisée combine ethnographie dans des espaces protégés alpins, enquêtes quantitatives et travail avec les images.La thèse décrit le fonctionnement, l'organisation et les missions des conseils scientifiques de l'action publique environnementale afin de les situer dans le domaine de l'expertise et de mieux appréhender leur rôle effectif, entre scènes et coulisses, dans la gouvernance de la nature. Elle s'intéresse plus particulièrement à la construction de collectifs interprofessionnels à l'interface entre savoirs et actions, dans des situations aux frontières mouvantes. En creux de ces instances se développe un milieu relationnel actif qui forme des modes interactionnels complexes oscillant entre expertise et collaboration, entre proximité et prise de distance. Ces relations provoquent des ajustements pour préserver la distance entre « science et action » et l'imperméabilité affichée de leur frontière. La thèse invite, en définitive, à réfléchir à la conjonction possible de différents régimes de sciences en société et à ses effets notamment sur les processus d'expertise et leur degré d'ouverture.

Nature conservation policies are founded on the mobilization of numerous scientists in multipleorganizations at different scales. In France, the scientific councils of protected areas are propitious places tostudy the relationships between science, society and nature. Participants in these councils confront theirknowledge, disciplines, professional points of view and representations to negotiate nature managementpractices. But these organizations were so far surprisingly little known. Drawing on science studies and thesociology of professional groups, this thesis proposes an ethnographic approach to analyze the effects ofinterprofessional relationships in different science regimes. The methodology combines ethnography ofalpine protected areas, quantitative surveys and a work on images and videos.The thesis proposes an overview of the scientific councils' organizations and missions in the sector ofenvironmental public action in order to understand their place in the expertise field. It documents the onstageand backstage role of these organizations in the making of nature conservation policies. It thendescribes the construction of interprofessional collectives at the interface between knowledge and action,between shifting boundaries. The development of an active relational context forms complex interactionalmodes oscillating between expertise and collaboration, between proximities and distances. Therelationships between scientists and practitioners produce adjustments to preserve the distance betweenscience and action and the impermeability of their boundary. Finally, the thesis invites to think about thepossible conjunction of different science regimes in order to open expertise processes to other kinds ofknowledge and legitimacy. ; Les politiques de la nature reposent sur la mobilisation massive de scientifiques au sein d'instances multiples et variées, oeuvrant à toutes les échelles. Dans les soupentes de l'action publique, des acteur·rices confrontent leurs savoirs, leurs traditions disciplinaires, leurs pratiques professionnelles et leurs représentations pour négocier des façons de « gérer la nature ».En France, les conseils scientifiques des espaces naturels protégés sont des lieux privilégiés pour étudier l'évolution des rapports entre natures, sciences et sociétés. Ils étaient pourtant jusqu'à présent méconnus. Articulant sociologie des sciences et sociologie des groupes professionnels, cette thèse analyse les effets des relations interprofessionnelles qui se tissent au gré des rencontres dans ces instances et à la conjonction de différents régimes de sciences en société. La méthode mobilisée combine ethnographie dans des espaces protégés alpins, enquêtes quantitatives et travail avec les images.La thèse décrit le fonctionnement, l'organisation et les missions des conseils scientifiques de l'action publique environnementale afin de les situer dans le domaine de l'expertise et de mieux appréhender leur rôle effectif, entre scènes et coulisses, dans la gouvernance de la nature. Elle s'intéresse plus particulièrement à la construction de collectifs interprofessionnels à l'interface entre savoirs et actions, dans des situations aux frontières mouvantes. En creux de ces instances se développe un milieu relationnel actif qui forme des modes interactionnels complexes oscillant entre expertise et collaboration, entre proximité et prise de distance. Ces relations provoquent des ajustements pour préserver la distance entre « science et action » et l'imperméabilité affichée de leur frontière. La thèse invite, en définitive, à réfléchir à la conjonction possible de différents régimes de sciences en société et à ses effets notamment sur les processus d'expertise et leur degré d'ouverture.

Nature conservation policies are founded on the mobilization of numerous scientists in multipleorganizations at different scales. In France, the scientific councils of protected areas are propitious places tostudy the relationships between science, society and nature. Participants in these councils confront theirknowledge, disciplines, professional points of view and representations to negotiate nature managementpractices. But these organizations were so far surprisingly little known. Drawing on science studies and thesociology of professional groups, this thesis proposes an ethnographic approach to analyze the effects ofinterprofessional relationships in different science regimes. The methodology combines ethnography ofalpine protected areas, quantitative surveys and a work on images and videos.The thesis proposes an overview of the scientific councils' organizations and missions in the sector ofenvironmental public action in order to understand their place in the expertise field. It documents the onstageand backstage role of these organizations in the making of nature conservation policies. It thendescribes the construction of interprofessional collectives at the interface between knowledge and action,between shifting boundaries. The development of an active relational context forms complex interactionalmodes oscillating between expertise and collaboration, between proximities and distances. Therelationships between scientists and practitioners produce adjustments to preserve the distance betweenscience and action and the impermeability of their boundary. Finally, the thesis invites to think about thepossible conjunction of different science regimes in order to open expertise processes to other kinds ofknowledge and legitimacy. ; Les politiques de la nature reposent sur la mobilisation massive de scientifiques au sein d'instances multiples et variées, oeuvrant à toutes les échelles. Dans les soupentes de l'action publique, des acteur·rices confrontent leurs savoirs, leurs traditions disciplinaires, leurs pratiques professionnelles et leurs représentations pour négocier des façons de « gérer la nature ».En France, les conseils scientifiques des espaces naturels protégés sont des lieux privilégiés pour étudier l'évolution des rapports entre natures, sciences et sociétés. Ils étaient pourtant jusqu'à présent méconnus. Articulant sociologie des sciences et sociologie des groupes professionnels, cette thèse analyse les effets des relations interprofessionnelles qui se tissent au gré des rencontres dans ces instances et à la conjonction de différents régimes de sciences en société. La méthode mobilisée combine ethnographie dans des espaces protégés alpins, enquêtes quantitatives et travail avec les images.La thèse décrit le fonctionnement, l'organisation et les missions des conseils scientifiques de l'action publique environnementale afin de les situer dans le domaine de l'expertise et de mieux appréhender leur rôle effectif, entre scènes et coulisses, dans la gouvernance de la nature. Elle s'intéresse plus particulièrement à la construction de collectifs interprofessionnels à l'interface entre savoirs et actions, dans des situations aux frontières mouvantes. En creux de ces instances se développe un milieu relationnel actif qui forme des modes interactionnels complexes oscillant entre expertise et collaboration, entre proximité et prise de distance. Ces relations provoquent des ajustements pour préserver la distance entre « science et action » et l'imperméabilité affichée de leur frontière. La thèse invite, en définitive, à réfléchir à la conjonction possible de différents régimes de sciences en société et à ses effets notamment sur les processus d'expertise et leur degré d'ouverture.

Nature conservation policies are founded on the mobilization of numerous scientists in multipleorganizations at different scales. In France, the scientific councils of protected areas are propitious places tostudy the relationships between science, society and nature. Participants in these councils confront theirknowledge, disciplines, professional points of view and representations to negotiate nature managementpractices. But these organizations were so far surprisingly little known. Drawing on science studies and thesociology of professional groups, this thesis proposes an ethnographic approach to analyze the effects ofinterprofessional relationships in different science regimes. The methodology combines ethnography ofalpine protected areas, quantitative surveys and a work on images and videos.The thesis proposes an overview of the scientific councils' organizations and missions in the sector ofenvironmental public action in order to understand their place in the expertise field. It documents the onstageand backstage role of these organizations in the making of nature conservation policies. It thendescribes the construction of interprofessional collectives at the interface between knowledge and action,between shifting boundaries. The development of an active relational context forms complex interactionalmodes oscillating between expertise and collaboration, between proximities and distances. Therelationships between scientists and practitioners produce adjustments to preserve the distance betweenscience and action and the impermeability of their boundary. Finally, the thesis invites to think about thepossible conjunction of different science regimes in order to open expertise processes to other kinds ofknowledge and legitimacy. ; Les politiques de la nature reposent sur la mobilisation massive de scientifiques au sein d'instances multiples et variées, oeuvrant à toutes les échelles. Dans les soupentes de l'action publique, des acteur·rices confrontent leurs savoirs, leurs traditions disciplinaires, leurs pratiques professionnelles et leurs représentations pour négocier des façons de « gérer la nature ».En France, les conseils scientifiques des espaces naturels protégés sont des lieux privilégiés pour étudier l'évolution des rapports entre natures, sciences et sociétés. Ils étaient pourtant jusqu'à présent méconnus. Articulant sociologie des sciences et sociologie des groupes professionnels, cette thèse analyse les effets des relations interprofessionnelles qui se tissent au gré des rencontres dans ces instances et à la conjonction de différents régimes de sciences en société. La méthode mobilisée combine ethnographie dans des espaces protégés alpins, enquêtes quantitatives et travail avec les images.La thèse décrit le fonctionnement, l'organisation et les missions des conseils scientifiques de l'action publique environnementale afin de les situer dans le domaine de l'expertise et de mieux appréhender leur rôle effectif, entre scènes et coulisses, dans la gouvernance de la nature. Elle s'intéresse plus particulièrement à la construction de collectifs interprofessionnels à l'interface entre savoirs et actions, dans des situations aux frontières mouvantes. En creux de ces instances se développe un milieu relationnel actif qui forme des modes interactionnels complexes oscillant entre expertise et collaboration, entre proximité et prise de distance. Ces relations provoquent des ajustements pour préserver la distance entre « science et action » et l'imperméabilité affichée de leur frontière. La thèse invite, en définitive, à réfléchir à la conjonction possible de différents régimes de sciences en société et à ses effets notamment sur les processus d'expertise et leur degré d'ouverture.

Nature conservation policies are founded on the mobilization of numerous scientists in multipleorganizations at different scales. In France, the scientific councils of protected areas are propitious places tostudy the relationships between science, society and nature. Participants in these councils confront theirknowledge, disciplines, professional points of view and representations to negotiate nature managementpractices. But these organizations were so far surprisingly little known. Drawing on science studies and thesociology of professional groups, this thesis proposes an ethnographic approach to analyze the effects ofinterprofessional relationships in different science regimes. The methodology combines ethnography ofalpine protected areas, quantitative surveys and a work on images and videos.The thesis proposes an overview of the scientific councils' organizations and missions in the sector ofenvironmental public action in order to understand their place in the expertise field. It documents the onstageand backstage role of these organizations in the making of nature conservation policies. It thendescribes the construction of interprofessional collectives at the interface between knowledge and action,between shifting boundaries. The development of an active relational context forms complex interactionalmodes oscillating between expertise and collaboration, between proximities and distances. Therelationships between scientists and practitioners produce adjustments to preserve the distance betweenscience and action and the impermeability of their boundary. Finally, the thesis invites to think about thepossible conjunction of different science regimes in order to open expertise processes to other kinds ofknowledge and legitimacy. ; Les politiques de la nature reposent sur la mobilisation massive de scientifiques au sein d'instances multiples et variées, oeuvrant à toutes les échelles. Dans les soupentes de l'action publique, des acteur·rices confrontent leurs savoirs, leurs traditions disciplinaires, leurs pratiques professionnelles et leurs représentations pour négocier des façons de « gérer la nature ».En France, les conseils scientifiques des espaces naturels protégés sont des lieux privilégiés pour étudier l'évolution des rapports entre natures, sciences et sociétés. Ils étaient pourtant jusqu'à présent méconnus. Articulant sociologie des sciences et sociologie des groupes professionnels, cette thèse analyse les effets des relations interprofessionnelles qui se tissent au gré des rencontres dans ces instances et à la conjonction de différents régimes de sciences en société. La méthode mobilisée combine ethnographie dans des espaces protégés alpins, enquêtes quantitatives et travail avec les images.La thèse décrit le fonctionnement, l'organisation et les missions des conseils scientifiques de l'action publique environnementale afin de les situer dans le domaine de l'expertise et de mieux appréhender leur rôle effectif, entre scènes et coulisses, dans la gouvernance de la nature. Elle s'intéresse plus particulièrement à la construction de collectifs interprofessionnels à l'interface entre savoirs et actions, dans des situations aux frontières mouvantes. En creux de ces instances se développe un milieu relationnel actif qui forme des modes interactionnels complexes oscillant entre expertise et collaboration, entre proximité et prise de distance. Ces relations provoquent des ajustements pour préserver la distance entre « science et action » et l'imperméabilité affichée de leur frontière. La thèse invite, en définitive, à réfléchir à la conjonction possible de différents régimes de sciences en société et à ses effets notamment sur les processus d'expertise et leur degré d'ouverture.