Children of Rus': Right-Bank Ukraine and the Invention of a Russian Nation by Faith Hillis
In: Ab imperio: studies of new imperial history and nationalism in the Post-Soviet space, Band 2017, Heft 3, S. 269-281
ISSN: 2164-9731
974794 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Ab imperio: studies of new imperial history and nationalism in the Post-Soviet space, Band 2017, Heft 3, S. 269-281
ISSN: 2164-9731
In: Politija: analiz, chronika, prognoz ; žurnal političeskoj filosofii i sociologii politiki = Politeía, Band 87, Heft 4, S. 65-81
ISSN: 2587-5914
In: Journal for the study of radicalism, Band 11, Heft 1, S. 53-82
ISSN: 1930-1197
In: Kyiv-Mohyla law and politics journal, Band 0, Heft 2, S. 117-128
ISSN: 2414-9942
In: The Slavonic and East European review: SEER, Band 94, Heft 4, S. 744-746
ISSN: 2222-4327
In: Cahiers du monde russe: Russie, Empire Russe, Union Soviétique, Etats Indépendants ; revue trimestrielle, Band 57, Heft 4, S. 911-914
ISSN: 1777-5388
In: Sravnitelʹnaja politika: Comparative politics Russia, Band 7, Heft 2(23), S. 134-139
ISSN: 2412-4990
In: Canadian Slavonic papers: an interdisciplinary journal devoted to Central and Eastern Europe, Band 58, Heft 2, S. 200-201
ISSN: 2375-2475
In 2014, the agricultural sanctions Russia imposed on the European Union (EU) had a perceivable impact on the EU's economy. Yet the sanctions arguably had a disproportionate impact, which suggests they were particularly successful in exposing underlying issues within the EU. Specifically, former Soviet bloc countries and southern European countries were far more greatly impacted by the sanctions than the larger western EU member states. This brings to light problems of disproportionate representation of member states within decision-making processes (especially within the Committee for Agriculture and Rural Development), and the fragility of the EU's internal cohesion. By comparing typical decision-making processes of the EU with its responses during times of crisis, it becomes clear that the EU's decision-making process and its internal cohesion with regard to economic assistance for former Soviet states, are vulnerable to Russia's actions. The essay will conclude with recommendations on how to improve EU decision-making during times of crisis to counter this vulnerability. Full text available at: https://doi.org/10.22215/rera.v10i1.261
BASE
In: Journal of contemporary East Asia studies, Band 5, Heft 2, S. 61-78
ISSN: 2476-1036
SSRN
Working paper
In 2014, the agricultural sanctions Russia imposed on the European Union (EU) had a perceivable impact on the EU's economy. Yet the sanctions arguably had a disproportionate impact, which suggests they were particularly successful in exposing underlying issues within the EU. Specifically, former Soviet bloc countries and southern European countries were far more greatly impacted by the sanctions than the larger western EU member states. This brings to light problems of disproportionate representation of member states within decision-making processes (especially within the Committee for Agriculture and Rural Development), and the fragility of the EU's internal cohesion. By comparing typical decision-making processes of the EU with its responses during times of crisis, it becomes clear that the EU's decision-making process and its internal cohesion with regard to economic assistance for former Soviet states, are vulnerable to Russia's actions. The essay will conclude with recommendations on how to improve EU decision-making during times of crisis to counter this vulnerability.
BASE
In: Sibirica: journal of Siberian studies ; the journal of Russia in Asia and the North Pacific, Band 15, Heft 1
ISSN: 1476-6787
In: Journal of world history: official journal of the World History Association, Band 27, Heft 1, S. 168-171
ISSN: 1527-8050
In: The Slavonic and East European review: SEER, Band 94, Heft 1, S. 155-158
ISSN: 2222-4327