Suchergebnisse

Since their formation, the parties of political Islam that exist today in Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia were traditionally seen as the "voice of people" in authoritarian states, the means and the vanguard of social movement for a better life. In an attempt to enter political arena, while adapting to different challenges posed by their regimes as well as jihadi Islamism both domestically and regionally, these Islamist parties have undergone a number of transformations both in their ideology and relations with the regime. However, the crucial point of these transformations was becoming a part of the state that they had been aiming to change. After their short-lived electoral success, they find themselves in crisis. First, they are no longer perceived as a sociopolitical force that strives to voice concerns of the oppressed and to fight for their interests against the unjust regimes. Instead, they are now deeply associated with the "old guard", no less corrupt than the governments and the political elites, against whom people protest. Second, while they were trying to adapt democratic ideas to their narratives, they were moving further away from their Islamist identity. Third, they have learnt the constraints of their political capabilities: in order to preserve their legal status, they have to coopt with the regimes, but when they do they lose their public support, and when they resent this cooptation, the regimes force them to weakness and internal divisions, yet again causing loss of social base.

"Once celebrated in the Western media as a shining example of a 'liberal' and 'tolerant' Islam, Indonesia since the end of the Soeharto regime (May 1998) has witnessed a variety of developments that bespeak a conservative turn in the country's Muslim politics. In this timely collection of original essays, Martin van Bruinessen, our most distinguished senior Western scholar of Indonesian Islam, and four leading Indonesian Muslim scholars explore and explain these developments. Each chapter examines recent trends from a strategic institutional perch: the Council of Indonesian Muslim scholars, the reformist Muhammadiyah, South Sulawesi's Committee for the Implementation of Islamic Shari'a, and radical Islamism in Solo. With van Bruinessen's brilliantly synthetic introduction and conclusion, these essays shed a bright light on what Indonesian Muslim politics was and where it seems to be going. The analysis is complex and by no means uniformly dire. For readers interested in Indonesian Muslim politics, and for analysts interested in the dialectical interplay of progressive and conservative Islam, this book is fascinating and essential reading." —Robert Hefner, Director, Institute on Culture, Religion, and World Affairs, Boston University "Indonesian Islam has been (and still is) largely known as Islam with 'smiling faces'. But in the last decade at least, drawing benefit from the democratic opening up, some figures and groups introduced radical Islamic ideas and praxis that have transnational origins that in turn could affect the future of Indonesian Islam. This book is an excellent anthology of this disturbing development brought about by the so-called 'conservative turn' within certain elements of moderate Islam in the largest Muslim country in the world. There is no doubt that this book contributes a great deal to a better grasp of some recent development to watch in Indonesian Islam." —Azyumardi Azra, Professor of History, Director of Graduate School, State Islamic University, Jakarta, Indonesia "Over the course of the past decade, journalists and other observers have noted a 'conservative turn' in Indonesian Islam, but without seriously investigating or explaining the nature and extent of the transformation(s) under way. With the publication of this excellent new volume, Martin van Bruinessen and his collaborators have now provided a fine-grained account of the complex and diverse manifestations of this 'conservative turn', with in-depth ...

According to the invariance of many provisions of Islamic teachings on the one hand and existence of interest on the other hand, political Islam by interpreting repeated primary and secondary rules meaning tries to strengthen Islamic state.Therefore, moral meaning and discourse of human rights concepts such as freedom, equality, justice and ... is different from many traditional and political jurists and implications in the moral bases at west (Kant's own good school and school of profitability) and Western human rights. Accordingly, in this paper, we try that according to the views of Imam Khomeini as the founder of political Islam in Iranand Ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi as one of the most important theorists of this discourse that have different ideas about ethics and discourse concepts of human rights and explain the position of political Islam with regard to the domestic interests in the west moral education with an emphasis on Kant's own good and utility schools and moral concepts of human rights.Now the question in study is that according to the ethics discourse of human rights concepts and some basic precepts of Islamic teachings, whether political Islam and more has functionality the consistency with Kant's ethics or due to the use of evidence deemed, is consistent with profitability school or not or finally by rejecting the aforementioned schools, offers a third way? And according to his moral system in contrast to the concepts of human rights discourse, provides what position?

Conquering Tunis -- The sultan, the tsar and the shah -- The Battle for Barbary -- An apt man in Constantinople -- Unholy alliances -- Sultana Isabel -- London turns Turk -- Mahomet's dove -- Escape from the Seraglio -- Sherley fever -- More than a Moor -- Epilogue

The enduring settlement of Islam in Europe produces tensions & raises sociological, political, philosophical, & moral issues. While mainstream public opinion ponders the compatibility of Islam with Western values, Islam itself emerges as a "minority religion" in search of representation & recognition, which questions the position of the democratic state on the separation of church & state & on equality of the citizens. The politicization of Islam in France & Germany, which can be seen as the origin of its ethnicization, forces the two states to consider the possibilities & means of Islam's integration in each country's institutional framework, to reflect on each society & its mentality, & to rethink concepts of citizenship. These questions are exacerbated by recent developments, in particular the manifestation of Islam as an explicitly transnational political force that transcends the borders of both Europe & its countries of origin. Nonetheless, the nation state remains the only legal & democratic reference point for the official recognition of Islam & of the Muslim population's status as citizens. 39 References. Adapted from the source document.

One of the causes is not the end of the study the Koran is the Koran contains many possible meanings (Wujûh al-Ma'ânî) continuous potential can be explored and interpreted in accordance with the methods and tendencies interpreter. Therefore, no wonder the result was rich in meaning and interpretation is different, so lure the attention of others to re-refine and refuse to offer a different perspective. This viewpoint difference is attributed to the possibility of the many meanings of the Koran, also due to socio-cultural and areas of specialization of each interpreter. Ideology and political upheaval Muslims initial period stimulate the birth of the leaders of rival political and theological thinking bolder and varied. As evidence, if at the time of the Prophet and the Companions interpretation of verses mutashâbih tend to be avoided, the interpretation of later generations of the same paragraph as the focus of their attention and more wide open. So also with the interpretation of the Koran political interests and ideological bias increasingly widespread

One of the causes is not the end of the study the Koran is the Koran contains many possible meanings (Wujûh al-Ma'ânî) continuous potential can be explored and interpreted in accordance with the methods and tendencies interpreter. Therefore, no wonder the result was rich in meaning and interpretation is different, so lure the attention of others to re-refine and refuse to offer a different perspective. This viewpoint difference is attributed to the possibility of the many meanings of the Koran, also due to socio-cultural and areas of specialization of each interpreter. Ideology and political upheaval Muslims initial period stimulate the birth of the leaders of rival political and theological thinking bolder and varied. As evidence, if at the time of the Prophet and the Companions interpretation of verses mutashâbih tend to be avoided, the interpretation of later generations of the same paragraph as the focus of their attention and more wide open. So also with the interpretation of the Koran political interests and ideological bias increasingly widespread

The systematic study of historic civilizations is now attracting the attention of a growing number of anthropologically trained archeologists. The objectives of these investigators are not simply to repeat or to verify what is already known from textual evidence, but to extend the scope and fullness of our understanding of these important cultures (Moore, ed., 1974; Sabloff & Lamberg-Karlovsky, eds., 1975; Redman et al. ed., 1978). The study of historic civilizations offers a series of unique opportunities that equal and sometimes surpass those provided by the more commonly studied prehistoric cultures. First, the existence of historical documentation often facilitates the formulation of absolute chronologies for excavated material. By correlating archeological episodes with historically dated events, it is frequently possible even to assign lengths of duration to particular occupations. Second, the architectural and artifactual remains of historic civilizations are usually abundant in quantity and more readily identifiable than prehistoric material. Since many of the excavated tools, decorative objects and buildings are known from texts, art work or their continued use in recent times, identification and functional interpretation are more reliable, having been made by homology rather than by analogy. Third, and finally, the societal organization and processual relationships of historic civilizations are of considerable interest to anthropologists. Relatively sophisticated behavioral questions can be addressed because of the above two interpretive advantages and the fact that the historic record often provides general insights into the political and economic patterns of the era that aid in model building.

AbstractPolitics in Malaysia revolves around the tensions between the three major ethnic groups: Malays, Chinese and Indians. After the 1969 ethnic riots, the country adopted an affirmative action programme widely regarded as racist towards the non‐Malays. The rise of political Islam in recent times has added a religious layer to institutional racism. This article looks at contemporary racism towards the Malaysian Chinese community and argues that things will get worse in the future owing to the omnipresence of the Malay Islamic supremacy ideology.