Reply to Livingston and Soroko
In: Political theory: an international journal of political philosophy, Band 35, Heft 4, S. 502-507
ISSN: 1552-7476
186593 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Political theory: an international journal of political philosophy, Band 35, Heft 4, S. 502-507
ISSN: 1552-7476
In: Political theory: an international journal of political philosophy, Band 35, Heft 4, S. 529-532
ISSN: 1552-7476
In: Political theory: an international journal of political philosophy, Band 35, Heft 4, S. 532-536
ISSN: 1552-7476
In: Political theory: an international journal of political philosophy, Band 35, Heft 4, S. 517-521
ISSN: 1552-7476
In: Political theory: an international journal of political philosophy, Band 35, Heft 3, S. 354-363
ISSN: 1552-7476
In: Political theory: an international journal of political philosophy, Band 35, Heft 3, S. 364-370
ISSN: 1552-7476
In: Political theory: an international journal of political philosophy, Band 35, Heft 3, S. 348-353
ISSN: 1552-7476
In: Political theory: an international journal of political philosophy, Band 35, Heft 3, S. 288-312
ISSN: 1552-7476
This essay utilizes Plato's insights into the role of shame in dialogical interactions to illuminate the aesthetic dimensions of deliberative democracy. Through a close analysis of the refutation of Polus in Plato's dialogue, the Gorgias, I show how the emotion of shame is central to the unsettling, dynamic, and transformative character of democratic engagement and political judgment identified by recent aesthetic critics of Habermas' model of communicative action and democratic deliberation. Plato's analysis of shame offers a friendly amendment to these aesthetic critiques by showing how the psychological forces at the heart of shame make the outcome of our political engagements with others uncertain and unsettling, even while they make possible the kind of self-reflexivity necessary to foster the deliberative virtue of sincerity or truthfulness.
In: Political theory: an international journal of political philosophy, Band 35, Heft 3, S. 253-287
ISSN: 1552-7476
The global distributive implications of automatically allocating political membership according to territoriality ( jus soli) and parentage ( jus sanguinis) principles have largely escaped critical scrutiny. This article begins to address this considerable gap. Securing membership status in a given state or region— with its specific level of wealth, degree of stability, and human rights record— is a crucial factor in the determination of life chances. However, birthright entitlements still dominate both our imagination and our laws in the allotment of political membership to a given state. In this article we explore the striking conceptual and legal similarities between intergenerational transfers of citizenship and property. The analogy between inherited citizenship and the intergenerational transfer of property allows us to use existing qualifications found in the realm of inheritance as a model for imposing restrictions on the unlimited and perpetual transmission of membership—with the aim of ameliorating its most glaring opportunity inequalities.
In: Political theory: an international journal of political philosophy, Band 35, Heft 2, S. 215-222
ISSN: 1552-7476
In: Political theory: an international journal of political philosophy, Band 35, Heft 2, S. 236-238
ISSN: 1552-7476
In: Political theory: an international journal of political philosophy, Band 35, Heft 2, S. 200-206
ISSN: 1552-7476
In: Political theory: an international journal of political philosophy, Band 35, Heft 2, S. 231-233
ISSN: 1552-7476
In: Political theory: an international journal of political philosophy, Band 35, Heft 2, S. 239-239
ISSN: 1552-7476
In: Political theory: an international journal of political philosophy, Band 35, Heft 2, S. 233-236
ISSN: 1552-7476