Andrea Quinlan, The Technoscientific Witness of Rape: Contentious Histories of Law, Feminism and Forensic Science
In: Somatechnics: journal of bodies, technologies, power, Band 7, Heft 2, S. 312-314
ISSN: 2044-0146
6456278 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Somatechnics: journal of bodies, technologies, power, Band 7, Heft 2, S. 312-314
ISSN: 2044-0146
In: Environmental politics, Band 22, Heft 2, S. 255-273
ISSN: 0964-4016
In: The independent review: journal of political economy, Band 2, Heft 1, S. 150-154
ISSN: 1086-1653
In: The American journal of sociology, Band 102, Heft 3, S. 861-863
ISSN: 1537-5390
In: Samantha Godwin,"Bad Science Makes Bad Law: How the Deference Afforded to Psychiatry Undermines Civil Libterties," 10 Seattle J. for Soc. Just. 647 (2012).
SSRN
Contributed articles
In: Family court review: publ. in assoc. with: Association of Family and Conciliation Courts, Band 48, Heft 3, S. 403-416
ISSN: 1744-1617
Social science research and the courts have begun to recognize the special challenges posed by "high‐conflict" separations for children and the justice system. The use of "high conflict" terminology by social science researchers and the courts has increased dramatically over the past decade. This is an important development, but the term is often used vaguely and to characterize very different types of cases. An analysis of Canadian case law reveals that some judges are starting to differentiate between various degrees and types of high conflict. Often this judicial differentiation is implicit and occurs without full articulation of the factors that are taken into account in applying different remedies. There is a need for the development of more refined, explicit analytical concepts for the identification and differentiation of various types of high conflict cases. Empirically driven social science research can assist mental health professionals, lawyers and the courts in better understanding these cases and providing the most appropriate interventions. As a tentative scheme for differentiating cases, we propose distinguishing between high conflict cases where there is: (1) poor communication; (2) domestic violence; and (3) alienation. Further, there must be a differentiation between cases where one parent is a primary instigator for the conflict or abuse, and those where both parents bear significant responsibility.
In: Soviet Law and Government, Band 1, Heft 3, S. 18-28
In: Politics and the life sciences: PLS ; a journal of political behavior, ethics, and policy, Band 4, Heft 1, S. 98-102
ISSN: 1471-5457
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 91, Heft 1, S. 50-55
ISSN: 1552-3349
In: Parliamentary affairs: a journal of comparative politics, Band 36, Heft 1, S. 361-361
ISSN: 1460-2482
"In this ground-breaking book, Steven Forde argues that John Locke's devotion to modern science deeply shaped his moral and political philosophy. Beginning with an account of the classical approach to natural and moral philosophy, and of the medieval scholasticism that took these forward into early modernity, Forde explores why the modern scientific project of Francis Bacon, Pierre Gassendi, Robert Boyle and others required the rejection of the classical approach. Locke fully subscribed to this rejection, and took it upon himself to provide a foundation for a compatible morality and politics. Forde shows that Locke's theory of moral "mixed modes" owes much to Pufendorf, and is tailored to accommodate science. The theory requires a divine legislator, which in turn makes natural law the foundation of morality, rather than individual natural right. Forde shows the ways that Locke's approach modified his individualism, and colored his philosophy of property, politics, and education"--
ISSN: 1471-5430