CLASHES OF TASTE IN CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION
In: Dissent: a journal devoted to radical ideas and the values of socialism and democracy, S. 301-311
ISSN: 0012-3846
MUCH OF THE CONTEMPORARY DEBATE ABOUT CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION IS CARRIED ON IN THE LANGUAGE OF ACCOUNTABILITY. IN THIS ESSAY, THE AUTHOR ARGUES THAT THE CONCERN ABOUT POLITICAL ACCOUNTABILITY EXPRESSED BY ALEXANDER BICKEL AND OTHERS COMES NOT ONLY FROM AN ESTEEM FOR THE RIGHTS OF POLITICAL MAJORITIES BUT ALSO FROM A DIMINISHED BELIEF IN THE CAPACITY TO GRASP, IN ANY VERY SATISFYING WAY, THE MEANING OF THE CONSTITUTION AS A FOUNDATIONAL DOCUMENT OR ENCLOSED SET OF UNDERSTANDINGS.