Die Inhalte der verlinkten Blogs und Blog Beiträge unterliegen in vielen Fällen keiner redaktionellen Kontrolle.
Warnung zur Verfügbarkeit
Eine dauerhafte Verfügbarkeit ist nicht garantiert und liegt vollumfänglich in den Händen der Herausgeber:innen. Bitte erstellen Sie sich selbständig eine Kopie falls Sie diese Quelle zitieren möchten.
Can privacy and innovation really go hand in hand? What can we do to safeguard sensitive data today, and what's in store for the future? Dan Cassara, Project Manager for the Digital Credit Observatory (DCO), explores these questions and more in the second part of this two-part series on privacy enhancing technologies and their role in financial inclusion. If you missed part one, click here to check it out.An employee at Radio Shabelle prepares the studio for an upcoming show | Tobin JonesTrust is fundamental for an improved digital financial system. As discussed in part one of this series, privacy enhancing technologies (PETs) play a central role in enabling trustworthy and responsible innovation. Despite the complexity of data privacy, policymakers are exploring regulatory approaches. Europe's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) may be the most well-known regulation, but it is not the only one. Globally, more than 130 countries have data privacy laws, a number many anticipate will increase as decision makers learn more about the benefits and challenges of responsible data usage.In conversation with partners, policymakers, and practitioners, CEGA explored this subject at its 2022 Africa Evidence Summit in Kigali, Rwanda. Key insights from the summit are summarized below:What: Minimizing data collection avoids the possibility for sensitive data to be improperly used or shared and is one of the most intuitive ways to protect privacy. When collecting sensitive or identifying information cannot be avoided — for example, for medical research — the next best step is to de-identify the data as soon as possible.How: Gathering informed consent prior to collecting any information is vital to conducting ethical research or providing services in most circumstances. However, Informed consent is based on complete, accurate, and understandable information, and it is important to recognize its limits. Often, these criteria are not met; for example, most privacy policies are designed to not be read. Even when all criteria are met, pressing needs can push people to accept terms they may otherwise reject. Regulatory guardrails can help balance the equation. For example, the Central Bank of Kenya has released regulations to address these types of concerns, which is a model that other governments can emulate.Where and Who: Safely storing data through encryption — scrambling data so it can only be unscrambled and read with authorized access — and putting appropriate access controls in place — limiting data access to authorized users — are two of the most commonly used security tools to protect data from being accessed outside its intended context. Unfortunately, many fintech apps either do not encrypt all data or use outdated modes of doing so, which leaves many of their customers vulnerable to data breaches. Requiring financial institutions to adopt the most secure standards for encryption and communication should be a high priority, whether through voluntary adoption or regulatory guidance.Why: There are typically trade-offs between privacy and accuracy, and effectively evaluating them is dependent on what purpose the data will serve. For example, public health guidance has historically permitted surveillance without consent in some settings where obtaining consent would not be possible or would impede public health goals, judging these benefits to outweigh privacy needs. It is imperative, however, that the usage of data is limited to its initial purpose. While cell phone data can be leveraged for humanitarian aid delivery or to benefit public health, the data shouldn't be used later for other purposes.The ongoing data revolution will likely transform the way people around the globe access and interact with financial services. This change has the exciting potential to promote financial inclusion and lift people out of poverty, but it also comes with risk of data misuse, financial loss, and infringements upon privacy.While protecting individual privacy and peace of mind is worth pursuing in and of itself, the benefits of proper data privacy frameworks go well beyond this. Using data improperly and not using data at all, for instance, both come with costs. Many private sector companies and government initiatives seek the same data but, lacking the means to responsibly and legally share it, collect it separately. This drives up costs and impedes innovation. Those with the least typically pay the largest share through higher interest rates, lower accessibility, and little to no data privacy.Tools like PETs can help mitigate risks and promote responsible innovation. More research is needed to explore how these tools can be best utilized to improve the financial well being of those excluded from the formal financial system. CEGA is contributing to this effort by funding a research agenda that examines key questions, such as:How do local definitions of data privacy vary by context, how can we best measure this, and how can we ensure local voices and values are incorporated into decision-making processes?What PETs or other tools are best suited for solving specific privacy problems, and can we analyze their effectiveness in doing so?How can privacy enhancing tools enable data portability and data sharing, which could unlock new or improved public goods such as credit bureaus or anti-terrorism monitoring systems?CEGA's Digital Credit Observatory (DCO) is building a portfolio of research and a community of researchers and practitioners that will drive a more comprehensive understanding of the challenges and solutions to protecting data privacy in low- and middle-income countries. If you're interested in research funding, collaborating, or learning more about the DCO, we'd love to hear from you at digitalcredit@berkeley.edu.Beyond Disruption: Rebuilding Privacy in the Digital Era was originally published in CEGA on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.
PurposeUsing integrated, constructivist and inquiry-based curricular experiences to expand student understanding of historical thinking and exposure to Native perspectives on Utah history, this paper aims to analyze the thinking and practice of teaching the Utah fourth grade social studies curriculum. As a team of researchers, teachers and administrators, the authors brought differing perspectives and experience to this shared project of curriculum design. The understanding was enhanced as the authors reflected on authors' own practitioner research and worked together as Native and non-Native community partners to revise the ways one group of fourth grade students experienced the curriculum, with plans to continue improving the thinking and implementation on an ongoing basis. While significant barriers to elementary social studies education exist in the current era of high-stakes testing, curriculum narrowing and continuing narratives of colonization in both the broad national context and our own localized context, the authors found that social studies curriculum can be a space for decolonization and growth for students and teachers alike when carefully planned, constructed and implemented.Design/methodology/approachThis article represents an effort by a team of teachers, administrators and researchers: D, a councilman and historian dedicated to sharing the history of the Northwestern Band of the Shoshone Nation; S, an eleventh-year teacher, teaching fourth grade at Mary Bethune Elementary School (MBES); E, the director of experiential learning and technology at MBES; L, the MBES vice principal and EL, a faculty member in the adjacent college of education. Working in these complementary roles, each authors recognized an opportunity to build a more robust set of curricular experiences for teaching the state standards for fourth grade social studies, with particular attention to a more inclusive set of narratives of Utah's history at the authors' shared site, Mary Bethune Elementary School, a K-6 public charter school that operates in partnership with the College of Education in a growing college town (population 51,000) in the Intermountain west. The complexity of Utah history embedded within the landscape that surrounds MBES has not always been a fully developed part of our fourth grade curriculum. Recognizing this, the authors came together to develop a more robust age-appropriate curricular experience for students that highlights the complexity of the individual and cultural narratives. In addition to smaller segments of classroom instruction devoted to the Utah Core fourth grade standards (Utah Education Network, 2019) that focus particularly on the history of Utah, the authors focused the curriculum improvement efforts on four specific lengthy spans of instruction.FindingsThese fourth-grade students read, contextualized and interpreted the primary source documents they encountered as historians; they both appreciated and challenged the authors' perspectives. It is our belief that students are more likely to continue to think like historians as they operate as "critical consumers" (Moore and Clark, 2004, p. 22) of other historical narratives. This ability to think and act with attention to multiple viewpoints and perspectives, power and counter stories develops more empathetic humans. While the authors prize the ability of students to succeed in intellectually rigorous tasks and learn content material, in the end this trait is the most important goal for teaching students history.Research limitations/implicationsThe authors recognize operating within primarily non-Native spaces and discourses about social studies; with curricular efforts, there are a variety of ways the authors could do harm. Along the way, the authors recognized places for future improvement, critically examining the authors' work. As the authors look to future planning, there are several issues identified as the next spaces that the authors wish to focus on improving the Utah Studies curriculum experience of fourth graders at MBES. This is an area for further exploration.Practical implicationsThis precise set of primary sources, field experiences and assessments will not be the right fit for other classrooms with differences in resources, space and time. The authors hope it will serve as an example of how teachers can create curriculum that addresses the failings of status quo social studies instruction with regard to Indigenous peoples. The students were not the only beneficiaries of change from this curriculum development and implementation; as a team the authors also benefited. The experience solidified our self-perception as decision makers for our classroom. The authors' ability to extend past the packaged curriculum of textbooks and worksheets made it easily available to engage students as historical inquirers into the multiple perspectives and complex contexts of decolonizing-counter narratives built the authors' confidence that such work can be successful across the curriculum.Social implicationsThe authors believe this is a more potent antidote to the colonizing-Eurocentric narratives of history that they will undoubtedly be exposed to in other spaces and times than simply teaching them a singular history from an Indigenous perspective; if students are able to contextualize, interpret, and question the accounts they encounter, they will be more likely to "challenge dominant historical and cultural narratives that are endemic in society" (Stoddard et al., 2014, p. 35). This too can make them more thoughtful consumers of today's news, whether that news is about Navajo voting rights in southeastern Utah or oil and gas development in South Dakota.Originality/valueWorking against the colonizing narratives present in media, textbooks and local folklore is necessary if the authors are to undermine the invisibility of Native experiences in most social studies curriculum (Journell, 2009) and the stereotyping and discrimination that Native American students experience as a result (Stowe, 2017, p. 243). This detailed look at how the authors developed and implemented standards-based curriculum with that intent adds to the "little research [that] exists on teacher-created curricula and discourse" (Masta and Rosa, p. 148).
Problem setting. The progressive digitalization of all spheres of life and their confident transition to fundamentally new forms of functioning and interaction between economic entities, public administration and international relations is based on digital tools that allow using digital technologies in the digitalization of the national economy. However, the experience of their application and effective use is insufficient in comparison with developed countries, so to ensure sustainable development of society, it is necessary to thoroughly and comprehensively study the features of digital tools and their use in government and to objectively assess the prospects of digitalization in all spheres of life in modern Ukraine.Recent research and publications analysis. The issue of digitalization and the increasing use of digital technologies is present in the research of many specialists. In particular, it is necessary to note significant achievements in this field of such scientists as V.Apalkova, O.Bernaziuk, S.Vereteniuk, N.Hrytsiak, N.Deieva, A.Dobrynin, N.Drahomyretska, O.Yemelyanenko, T.Kaminska, A.Kaminskyi, G.Karcheva, O.Kachnyi , S.Koliadenko, N.Kraus, V.Kuibida, S.Kutsenko, D.Layon, I.Lopushynskyi, V.Liashenko, A.Maslov, V.Nikolaev, V.Pysarenko, A.Semenchenko, K.Semiachkov, S. Chukut and many others. However, there is a necessity for complex research, which concern the use of digital tools for ensuring sustainable development.Previously unsettled parts of the general problem. The article aimed at substantiating the directions of intensification of the use of digital tools for ensuring sustainable development in Ukraine basing on the studies of features of the usage of digital tools, the analysis of its use in various fields at the present stage of the development of our state. Paper main body. The conceptual approach to understanding the essence of sustainable development makes it possible to consider this concept as "development that meets the needs of the current generation without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs." The answer to public demands is given by the Sustainable Development Goals, offering a new vision of economic growth of states and new values.In the context of the needs of today's development and the implications for future generations, we need to look at the digital economy and the increasing use of digital tools. Digitalization can not only solve today's problems but also generate new ones, the consequences of which may be felt by the next generation in the case of inefficient use of digital technologies. In the world, digitalization processes have significantly accelerated after quarantine and affected not only developed countries but also Ukraine and other developing countries. They relate to all spheres of public life, in particular, to the interaction of citizens with public authorities.In Ukraine, the introduction of digital tools in the work of state and municipal authorities has not become as widespread as abroad, but it is worth noting some steps in this direction. The following digital tools for interaction between the government and communities are already in force or will be implemented in the nearest future: for the government – feedback from the community population; involvement of people into the managerial process. For adult residents of communities – Centres for providing administrative services, which work as centres of "Action"; consulting zones for entrepreneurs; online population survey; local chatbots. For students and schoolchildren – the opportunity to get an IT profession online; career guidance online courses; electronic magazines.Along with public authorities, digitalization processes have confidently entered the business sphere, and this has become especially noticeable in the conditions of quarantine, according to which many employees were forced to switch to remote work. Digital tools allow businesses to adapt to new realities and build relationships between employees, customers and partners on a fundamentally new basis. They help to automate routine processes and business, and also to redirect free resources in the direction of finding new ideas for business development.Digitalization has also affected the scientific sphere – today it is difficult for the average scientist to imagine his work without the use of, for example, Google tools, in particular, such as Google Cloud Platform, Google Academy, etc. Thanks to them, it is possible to conduct comprehensive research and publish their results. And the use of such specialized digital tools for scientists as Google Public Data, Dataset Search and Google Data Studio makes it possible to work effectively with data sets.Along with the scientific sphere, digitalization is closely connected with the educational field. Responding to the quarantine requirements for distance learning, the State Education Quality Service of Ukraine has introduced the following distance forms: the study of practical experience of work of participants in the certification of pedagogical staff; conducting institutional audits of general secondary education institutions.Areas of intensification of the use of digital tools to ensure sustainable development are regulatory, organizational-managerial, labour, competency-based, project, infrastructure and international. The development of digitalization and the introduction of digital tools in social processes have become inevitable, so it is necessary to ensure the implementation of digitalization procedures with maximum effect.Conclusions and prospects for further studies. Digital tools can be defined as a tool, a mean to improve communication between individuals and legal entities and the state through digital technologies and online communications. In the direction for ensuring the sustainable development of society, digital tools are essential tools that minimize resource costs, which allows you to redirect their use in a more constructive direction and, if possible, to preserve the resource potential for future generations. ; Розглянуто особливості використання цифрових інструментів відповідно до потреб забезпечення сталого розвитку в суспільстві. Вивчено специфіку застосування цифрових інструментів у різних сферах життєдіяльності суспільства. Проаналізовано еволюцію розвитку цифрових інструментів у світі протягом останніх двадцяти років. Представлено напрями активізації застосування цифрових інструментів забезпечення сталого розвитку на сучасному етапі трансформаційних змін в Україні.
The article considers the peculiarities of the development and preservation of the ethnic identity of the Bulgarian population of the south of the MSSR and Izmail region of the USSR post-war period 1944-1954 years. The urgency of the research is proved, first of all, by the lack of knowledge of this question, insufficient number of documents available for scientific community. The topicality of this investigation is caused by the attempt to analyze the achievements of the Bulgarian Diaspora on the way to preserving its ethnic identity separately from other nationalities. The author points to the positive changes in the national, cultural and educational development of the Bulgarian Diaspora in the post-war period. The specific features of the education of the Bulgarian population during the Soviet era and the role of education in preserving the ethno social identity, the development of the national consciousness of the Bulgarians are revealed. The author states that the Bulgarian language remained in wide use only at home in the post-war period. The learning process was held on Russian. However, this contributed to the fact that the Bulgarian youth became competitive in entrance exams, and eventually they were able to work and occupy various positions in Ukraine, Moldova and also abroad. The article also analyzes the state policy in relation to the ethnic minorities. The important consequence of the state education policy became the formation of a new Bulgarian educational intelligentsia, which could not but affected the ethno cultural development and preservation of the ethnic identity of the Bulgarian population of the region. The government contributed to the creation of a number of Bulgarian art groups, they were formed on the state account and initiative. In addition to the organization, the financing of the art collectives was also performed by the government. The professional music schools and their branches were also opened in the regions with the Bulgarian population. Further, the author specifies the achievements of the Bulgarian population in the field of culture. The participation of the Bulgarians in the social and cultural life of the Izmail region and the south of the MSSR is researched. The author claims that it was the cultural sphere where the national identity of the Bulgarian ethnic group of Ukraine and Moldova was preserved. The role and place of amateur folk art in preserving the language, folklore and ethnographic heritage of the Bulgarian people in consolidation with the Bulgarian ethnic group, as well as renewing and strengthening the social and cultural connections of the Bulgarian Diaspora with Bulgaria are also revealed. However, numerous direct contacts were established only in the post-Stalin period. It was considered that the Bulgarian people were not indifferent to the national culture and its development. In disregard the ideological, political, ethnic turmoil that apprehended the Bulgarian population of southwestern Ukraine and the south of Moldova in the post-war period, they preserved the inherent peculiarities in language, culture, ritualism and religion. It should be noted that national identity, originality and uniqueness are better preserved in the spiritual sphere than in the economic field. Thus, the article of I.I. Tatarko provides important inputs to the study of the most urgent problems and issues of historiography in Eastern Europe – the post-war period and the policy of the Soviet Union towards ethnic minorities. ; У статті досліджено особливості розвитку та збереження болгарським населенням півдня МРСР та Ізмаїльської області УРСР етнічної ідентичності в повоєнних умовах 1944 – 1954 рр. Актуальність роботи обґрунтована насамперед слабкою вивченістю проблематики, недостатнім уведенням у науковий обіг джерел, а також спробою проаналізувати досягнення болгарської діаспори на шляху до збереження своєї етнічної ідентичності окремо від інших національностей. Автор висвітлює позитивні зрушення у національному, культурному та освітньому розвитку болгарської діаспори у повоєнний період. Розкриває специфіку здобуття освіти болгарським населенням за радянської влади та роль освіти у збереженні етнічної ідентичності, розвитку національної свідомості болгар. Автор зазначає, що болгарська мова в повоєнний період залишилася у широкому вживанні тільки в побуті, навчання здійснювалося російською мовою. Однак це сприяло тому, що болгарська молодь стала конкурентноспроможною на вступних іспитах, а надалі змогла працювати і обіймати різноманітні посади не тільки в Україні та Молдові, а й за їх межами. Крім того, у статті аналізується державна політика щодо етнічних меншин. Важливим наслідком державної політики у сфері освіти стало формування нової болгарської просвітницької інтелігенції, що не могло не вплинути на етнокультурний розвиток і збереження етнічної ідентичності болгарського населення краю. Влада сприяла появі великої кількості болгарських мистецьких колективів, утворювала їх сама. Відкривалися професійні музичні школи та їхні філії у регіонах із болгарським населенням. Зазначається, що окрім організації, позитивним внеском у розвиток колективів було їхнє фінансування. Далі автор конкретизує досягнення болгарського населення в галузі культури. Висвітлює участь болгар у суспільно-культурному житті Ізмаїльщини та півдня МРСР. Стверджує, що саме у сфері культури вдалося зберегти національну самобутність болгарського етносу України та Молдови. Відзначає високу роль самодіяльної народної творчості у збереженні мови, фольклорної та етнографічної спадщини болгарського народу, у консолідації болгарського етносу, а також у поновленні та зміцненні суспільних та культурних зв'язків болгарської діаспори з Болгарією. Зроблено висновок, що болгарському народу не була байдужа національна культура та її розвиток. Попри ідеологічні, політичні, етнічні негаразди, які спіткали болгарське населення Південно-Західної частини України та Півдня Молдови у повоєнний період, воно зберегло властиву йому специфіку в мові, культурі, обрядовості, релігії. При цьому слід зазначити, що національна ідентичність, оригінальність і неповторність краще збереглися у духовній сфері, ніж у сфері господарській. Отже, стаття І.І.Татарко робить важливий внесок у вивчення найактуальніших проблем та питань історіографії Східної Європи – повоєнний період і політика Радянського Союзу по відношенню до етнічних меншин.
Problem setting. The progressive digitalization of all spheres of life and their confident transition to fundamentally new forms of functioning and interaction between economic entities, public administration and international relations is based on digital tools that allow using digital technologies in the digitalization of the national economy. However, the experience of their application and effective use is insufficient in comparison with developed countries, so to ensure sustainable development of society, it is necessary to thoroughly and comprehensively study the features of digital tools and their use in government and to objectively assess the prospects of digitalization in all spheres of life in modern Ukraine.Recent research and publications analysis. The issue of digitalization and the increasing use of digital technologies is present in the research of many specialists. In particular, it is necessary to note significant achievements in this field of such scientists as V.Apalkova, O.Bernaziuk, S.Vereteniuk, N.Hrytsiak, N.Deieva, A.Dobrynin, N.Drahomyretska, O.Yemelyanenko, T.Kaminska, A.Kaminskyi, G.Karcheva, O.Kachnyi , S.Koliadenko, N.Kraus, V.Kuibida, S.Kutsenko, D.Layon, I.Lopushynskyi, V.Liashenko, A.Maslov, V.Nikolaev, V.Pysarenko, A.Semenchenko, K.Semiachkov, S. Chukut and many others. However, there is a necessity for complex research, which concern the use of digital tools for ensuring sustainable development.Previously unsettled parts of the general problem. The article aimed at substantiating the directions of intensification of the use of digital tools for ensuring sustainable development in Ukraine basing on the studies of features of the usage of digital tools, the analysis of its use in various fields at the present stage of the development of our state. Paper main body. The conceptual approach to understanding the essence of sustainable development makes it possible to consider this concept as "development that meets the needs of the current generation without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs." The answer to public demands is given by the Sustainable Development Goals, offering a new vision of economic growth of states and new values.In the context of the needs of today's development and the implications for future generations, we need to look at the digital economy and the increasing use of digital tools. Digitalization can not only solve today's problems but also generate new ones, the consequences of which may be felt by the next generation in the case of inefficient use of digital technologies. In the world, digitalization processes have significantly accelerated after quarantine and affected not only developed countries but also Ukraine and other developing countries. They relate to all spheres of public life, in particular, to the interaction of citizens with public authorities.In Ukraine, the introduction of digital tools in the work of state and municipal authorities has not become as widespread as abroad, but it is worth noting some steps in this direction. The following digital tools for interaction between the government and communities are already in force or will be implemented in the nearest future: for the government – feedback from the community population; involvement of people into the managerial process. For adult residents of communities – Centres for providing administrative services, which work as centres of "Action"; consulting zones for entrepreneurs; online population survey; local chatbots. For students and schoolchildren – the opportunity to get an IT profession online; career guidance online courses; electronic magazines.Along with public authorities, digitalization processes have confidently entered the business sphere, and this has become especially noticeable in the conditions of quarantine, according to which many employees were forced to switch to remote work. Digital tools allow businesses to adapt to new realities and build relationships between employees, customers and partners on a fundamentally new basis. They help to automate routine processes and business, and also to redirect free resources in the direction of finding new ideas for business development.Digitalization has also affected the scientific sphere – today it is difficult for the average scientist to imagine his work without the use of, for example, Google tools, in particular, such as Google Cloud Platform, Google Academy, etc. Thanks to them, it is possible to conduct comprehensive research and publish their results. And the use of such specialized digital tools for scientists as Google Public Data, Dataset Search and Google Data Studio makes it possible to work effectively with data sets.Along with the scientific sphere, digitalization is closely connected with the educational field. Responding to the quarantine requirements for distance learning, the State Education Quality Service of Ukraine has introduced the following distance forms: the study of practical experience of work of participants in the certification of pedagogical staff; conducting institutional audits of general secondary education institutions.Areas of intensification of the use of digital tools to ensure sustainable development are regulatory, organizational-managerial, labour, competency-based, project, infrastructure and international. The development of digitalization and the introduction of digital tools in social processes have become inevitable, so it is necessary to ensure the implementation of digitalization procedures with maximum effect.Conclusions and prospects for further studies. Digital tools can be defined as a tool, a mean to improve communication between individuals and legal entities and the state through digital technologies and online communications. In the direction for ensuring the sustainable development of society, digital tools are essential tools that minimize resource costs, which allows you to redirect their use in a more constructive direction and, if possible, to preserve the resource potential for future generations. ; Розглянуто особливості використання цифрових інструментів відповідно до потреб забезпечення сталого розвитку в суспільстві. Вивчено специфіку застосування цифрових інструментів у різних сферах життєдіяльності суспільства. Проаналізовано еволюцію розвитку цифрових інструментів у світі протягом останніх двадцяти років. Представлено напрями активізації застосування цифрових інструментів забезпечення сталого розвитку на сучасному етапі трансформаційних змін в Україні.
Multi-body systems (MSs) are assemblies composed of multiple bodies (either rigid or structurally flexible) connected among each other by means of mechanical joints. In many engineering fields (such as aerospace, aeronautics, robotics, machinery, military weapons and bio-mechanics) a large number of systems (e.g. space robots, aircraft, terrestrial vehicles, industrial machinery, launching systems) can be included in this category. The dynamic characteristics and performance of such complex systems need to be accurately and rapidly analyzed and predicted. Taking this engineering background into consideration, a new branch of study, named as Multi-body Systems Dynamics (MSD), emerged in the 1960s and has become an important research and development area in modern mechanics; it mainly addresses the theoretical modeling, numerical analysis, design optimization and control for complex MSs. The research on dynamics modeling and numerical solving techniques for rigid multi-body systems has relatively matured and perfected through the developments over the past half century. However, for many engineering problems, the rigid multi-body system model cannot meet the requirements in terms of precision. It is then necessary to consider the coupling between the large rigid motions of the MS components and their elastic displacements; thus the study of the dynamics of flexible MSs has gained increasing relevance. The flexible MSD involves many theories and methods, such as continuum mechanics, computational mechanics and nonlinear dynamics, thus implying a higher requirement on the theoretical basis. Robotic on-orbit operations for servicing, repairing or de-orbiting existing satellites are among space mission concepts expected to have a relevant role in a close future. In particular, many studies have been focused on removing significant debris objects from their orbit. While mission designs involving tethers, nets, harpoons or glues are among options studied and analyzed by the scientific and industrial community, the debris removal by means of robotic manipulators seems to be the solution with the longest space experience. In fact, robotic manipulators are now a well-established technology in space applications as they are routinely used for handling and assembling large space modules and for reducing human extravehicular activities on the International Space Station. The operations are generally performed in a tele-operated approach, where the slow motion of the robotic manipulator is controlled by specialized operators on board of the space station or at the ground control center. Grasped objects are usually cooperative, meaning they are capable to re-orient themselves or have appropriate mechanisms for engagement with the end-effectors of the manipulator (i.e. its terminal parts). On the other hand, debris removal missions would target objects which are often non-controlled and lacking specific hooking points. Moreover, there would be a distinctive advantage in terms of cost and reliability to conduct this type of mission profile in a fully autonomous manner, as issues like obstacle avoidance could be more easily managed locally than from a far away control center. Space Manipulator Systems (SMSs) are satellites made of a base platform equipped with one or more robotic arms. A SMS is a floating system because its base is not fixed to the ground like in terrestrial manipulators; therefore, the motion of the robotic arms affects the attitude and position of the base platform and vice versa. This reciprocal influence is denoted as "dynamic coupling" and makes the dynamics modeling and motion planning of a space robot much more complicated than those of fixed-base manipulators. Indeed, SMSs are complex systems whose dynamics modeling requires appropriate theoretical and mathematical tools. The growing importance SMSs are acquiring is due to their operational ductility as they are able to perform complicated tasks such as repairing, refueling, re-orbiting spacecraft, assembling articulated space structures and cleaning up the increasing amount of space debris. SMSs have also been employed in several rendezvous and docking missions. They have also been the object of many studies which verified the possibility to extend the operational life of commercial and scientific satellites by using an automated servicing spacecraft dedicated to repair, refuel and/or manage their failures (e.g. DARPA's Orbital Express and JAXA's ETS VII). Furthermore, Active Debris Removal (ADR) via robotic systems is one of the main concerns governments and space agencies have been facing in the last years. As a result, the grasping and post-grasping operations on non-cooperative objects are still open research areas facing many technical challenges: the target object identification by means of passive or active optical techniques, the estimation of its kinematic state, the design of dexterous robotic manipulators and end-effectors, the multi-body dynamics analysis, the selection of approaching and grasping maneuvers and the post-grasping mission planning are the main open research challenges in this field. The missions involving the use of SMSs are usually characterized by the following typical phases: 1. Orbital approach; 2. Rendez-vous; 3. Robotic arm(s) deployment; 4. Pre-grasping; 5. Grasping and post-grasping operations. This thesis project will focus on the last three. The manuscript is structured as follows: Chapter 1 presents the derivation of a multi-body system dynamics equations further developing them to reach their Kane's formulation; Chapter 2 investigates two different approaches (Particle Swarm Optimization and Machine Learning) dealing with a space manipulator deployment maneuver; Chapter 3 addresses the design of a combined Impedance+PD controller capable of accomplishing the pre-grasping phase goals and Chapter 4 is dedicated to the dynamic modeling of the closed-loop kinematic chain formed by the manipulator and the grasped target object and to the synthesis of a Jacobian Transpose+PD controller for a post-grasping docking maneuver. Finally, the concluding remarks summarize the overall thesis contribution.
IIn central Tunisia, the agricultural intensification of irrigated agriculture generates local and regional environmental impacts, linked to an increased consumption of inputs and resources, including water and soil. In favor of a more sustainable agriculture and in order to inform public policies of agricultural development, it is necessary to assess the impacts of agricultural practices and water and soil conservation planning (WSCP), and this at the territory scale. The question is how to implement an environmental assessment approach in a context of 1) scarcity of reliable data including statistics, and complexity of farming practices, 2) prominence of socio-economic issues over environmental concerns 3) lack of knowledge of the perception of local actors on these issues and therefore of difficulty in identifying relevant indicators (scientific and of the stakeholders) and mobilizable. We propose an innovative approach to design and implement a participative approach involving different types of actors, to enable them to get more insights into each other's logic and perceptions of the impacts of agricultural practices and WSCP. This approach is designed to produce quality information by valuing local knowledge, share and take into account the perceptions of different stakeholders, and finally, build a consensus to contribute to the development of more effective WSCP policies. This approach has been structured in two main stages: the design of a community of practices articulated to a participatory systemic rapid diagnosis and the implementation of participatory workshops. The evaluation mobilized a dual mechanism including external observers and a satisfaction survey among participants. The survey is based on an evaluation grid of this approach, its outcomes and its short term induced effect. Sharing and taking into account the information and data collected, as well as the expertise and perceptions of the various stakeholders, has made possible to produce information deemed satisfactory or very satisfactory by all the participants. This nourished the knowledge of almost all the stakeholders and contributed to a constructive dynamic of collective learning. Our approach has contributed significantly to the evolution of perceptions and to a stronger mutual understanding between government officials and farmers. A dashboard grouping the indicators mobilized by each stakeholder was discussed and allowed to highlight convergences and differences in their analysis grids. The gradual and adaptive structuring of the approach, the choices of the stakeholders, the venues for the workshops and the use of a neutral facilitator were very important factors for the commitment and the mobilization of the stakeholders, in particular at the central scale, in this operational space for consultation on territorial issues, agricultural practices and WSCP. This work demonstrates the interest of integrating the engineering of consultation and environmental assessment within one approach and its feasibility in a difficult context for the ACES policies implementation. ; En Tunisie centrale, l'intensification agricole de l'agriculture irriguée engendre des impacts environnementaux locaux et régionaux liés à une consommation accrue en intrants et ressources, dont l'eau et le sol. En faveur d'une agriculture plus durable et pour éclairer les politiques publiques de développement agricole, il est nécessaire d'évaluer les impacts des pratiques agricoles et d'aménagement de conservation des eaux et des sols (ACES), et ceci à l'échelle d'un territoire. La question est ainsi de savoir comment mettre en oeuvre une démarche d'évaluation environnementale dans un contexte 1) de rareté de données fiables y compris statistiques, et de complexité des pratiques agricoles, 2) de proéminence des questions socioéconomiques sur les préoccupations environnementales 3) de méconnaissance de la perception des acteurs locaux sur ces questions et donc de difficulté à identifier des indicateurs pertinents (sur le plan scientifique et des acteurs) et mobilisables. Nous proposons une démarche innovante de conception et mise en oeuvre d'une approche participative regroupant différents types d'acteurs, pour leur permettre d'appréhender mutuellement leurs logiques et leurs perceptions des impacts des pratiques agricoles et des ACES. Cette démarche est conçue pour produire de l'information de qualité en valorisant les savoirs locaux, partager et prendre en compte les perceptions des différents acteurs, et enfin construire des consensus pour contribuer à l'élaboration de politiques d'ACES plus efficaces. Elle a été structurée en deux grandes étapes : la conception en communauté de pratique articulée à un diagnostic rapide participatif systémique et la mise en oeuvre d'ateliers participatifs. L'évaluation a mobilisé un double dispositif comprenant des observateurs extérieurs et une enquête de satisfaction auprès des participants. Elle s'appuie sur une grille d'évaluation de cette démarche, de ses produits et des effets induits à court terme. Le partage et la prise en compte des informations et des données collectées, mais aussi des expertises et perceptions des différents acteurs, a permis de produire des informations jugées satisfaisantes ou très satisfaisantes par la totalité des participants. Cela a nourri les connaissances de la quasi-totalité des acteurs et a contribué à une dynamique constructive d'apprentissage collectif. Notre démarche a nettement contribué à l'évolution des perceptions et à une plus forte compréhension mutuelle des agents de l'administration et des agriculteurs. Un tableau de bord regroupant les indicateurs mobilisés par chaque acteur a été discuté et a permis de mettre en évidence convergences et différences dans leurs grilles d'analyse. La structuration progressive et adaptative de la démarche, les choix des acteurs, des lieux de réalisation des ateliers et le recours à un animateur neutre ont été des facteurs très importants pour l'engagement et la mobilisation des acteurs, en particulier au niveau central, dans cet espace opérationnel de concertation sur les enjeux territoriaux, les pratiques agricoles et les ACES. Ce travail démontre l'intérêt de l'intégration de l'ingénierie de la concertation et de l'évaluation environnementale au sein d'une même démarche et sa faisabilité dans un contexte difficile pour la mise en oeuvre de politiques d'ACES.
IIn central Tunisia, the agricultural intensification of irrigated agriculture generates local and regional environmental impacts, linked to an increased consumption of inputs and resources, including water and soil. In favor of a more sustainable agriculture and in order to inform public policies of agricultural development, it is necessary to assess the impacts of agricultural practices and water and soil conservation planning (WSCP), and this at the territory scale. The question is how to implement an environmental assessment approach in a context of 1) scarcity of reliable data including statistics, and complexity of farming practices, 2) prominence of socio-economic issues over environmental concerns 3) lack of knowledge of the perception of local actors on these issues and therefore of difficulty in identifying relevant indicators (scientific and of the stakeholders) and mobilizable. We propose an innovative approach to design and implement a participative approach involving different types of actors, to enable them to get more insights into each other's logic and perceptions of the impacts of agricultural practices and WSCP. This approach is designed to produce quality information by valuing local knowledge, share and take into account the perceptions of different stakeholders, and finally, build a consensus to contribute to the development of more effective WSCP policies. This approach has been structured in two main stages: the design of a community of practices articulated to a participatory systemic rapid diagnosis and the implementation of participatory workshops. The evaluation mobilized a dual mechanism including external observers and a satisfaction survey among participants. The survey is based on an evaluation grid of this approach, its outcomes and its short term induced effect. Sharing and taking into account the information and data collected, as well as the expertise and perceptions of the various stakeholders, has made possible to produce information deemed satisfactory or very satisfactory by all the participants. This nourished the knowledge of almost all the stakeholders and contributed to a constructive dynamic of collective learning. Our approach has contributed significantly to the evolution of perceptions and to a stronger mutual understanding between government officials and farmers. A dashboard grouping the indicators mobilized by each stakeholder was discussed and allowed to highlight convergences and differences in their analysis grids. The gradual and adaptive structuring of the approach, the choices of the stakeholders, the venues for the workshops and the use of a neutral facilitator were very important factors for the commitment and the mobilization of the stakeholders, in particular at the central scale, in this operational space for consultation on territorial issues, agricultural practices and WSCP. This work demonstrates the interest of integrating the engineering of consultation and environmental assessment within one approach and its feasibility in a difficult context for the ACES policies implementation. ; En Tunisie centrale, l'intensification agricole de l'agriculture irriguée engendre des impacts environnementaux locaux et régionaux liés à une consommation accrue en intrants et ressources, dont l'eau et le sol. En faveur d'une agriculture plus durable et pour éclairer les politiques publiques de développement agricole, il est nécessaire d'évaluer les impacts des pratiques agricoles et d'aménagement de conservation des eaux et des sols (ACES), et ceci à l'échelle d'un territoire. La question est ainsi de savoir comment mettre en oeuvre une démarche d'évaluation environnementale dans un contexte 1) de rareté de données fiables y compris statistiques, et de complexité des pratiques agricoles, 2) de proéminence des questions socioéconomiques sur les préoccupations environnementales 3) de méconnaissance de la perception des acteurs locaux sur ces questions et donc de difficulté à identifier des indicateurs pertinents (sur le plan scientifique et des acteurs) et mobilisables. Nous proposons une démarche innovante de conception et mise en oeuvre d'une approche participative regroupant différents types d'acteurs, pour leur permettre d'appréhender mutuellement leurs logiques et leurs perceptions des impacts des pratiques agricoles et des ACES. Cette démarche est conçue pour produire de l'information de qualité en valorisant les savoirs locaux, partager et prendre en compte les perceptions des différents acteurs, et enfin construire des consensus pour contribuer à l'élaboration de politiques d'ACES plus efficaces. Elle a été structurée en deux grandes étapes : la conception en communauté de pratique articulée à un diagnostic rapide participatif systémique et la mise en oeuvre d'ateliers participatifs. L'évaluation a mobilisé un double dispositif comprenant des observateurs extérieurs et une enquête de satisfaction auprès des participants. Elle s'appuie sur une grille d'évaluation de cette démarche, de ses produits et des effets induits à court terme. Le partage et la prise en compte des informations et des données collectées, mais aussi des expertises et perceptions des différents acteurs, a permis de produire des informations jugées satisfaisantes ou très satisfaisantes par la totalité des participants. Cela a nourri les connaissances de la quasi-totalité des acteurs et a contribué à une dynamique constructive d'apprentissage collectif. Notre démarche a nettement contribué à l'évolution des perceptions et à une plus forte compréhension mutuelle des agents de l'administration et des agriculteurs. Un tableau de bord regroupant les indicateurs mobilisés par chaque acteur a été discuté et a permis de mettre en évidence convergences et différences dans leurs grilles d'analyse. La structuration progressive et adaptative de la démarche, les choix des acteurs, des lieux de réalisation des ateliers et le recours à un animateur neutre ont été des facteurs très importants pour l'engagement et la mobilisation des acteurs, en particulier au niveau central, dans cet espace opérationnel de concertation sur les enjeux territoriaux, les pratiques agricoles et les ACES. Ce travail démontre l'intérêt de l'intégration de l'ingénierie de la concertation et de l'évaluation environnementale au sein d'une même démarche et sa faisabilité dans un contexte difficile pour la mise en oeuvre de politiques d'ACES.
AbstractScience and technology activities for the community aims to provide knowledge to them in finding solutions to problems. Tateli II is one of the villages in Tateli II Village, Mandolang Sub-district, Minahasa District, North Sulawesi Province. Tateli II village fishermen are often or often confused with the marketing of fishery products because of the low selling price; this is because of their low state of knowledge about postharvest handling so that income is always low. Fishermen should be taught how to handle post-harvest catch so that when sold will create a reasonable price and at least be in accordance with the results of the business. One effort to maintain the quality of fishery products of fisherman production since harvested to the hands of consumers, and fish in a fresh / wet condition is handling with cold chain system (cold chain system).Training methods are based on adult learning methods (self-taught) and classically by providing theory and practice through lectures and group discussions (FGD: Focus Group Disscution). Implementation is made by providing theory as much as 25% and practice as much as 75% for 8 months.First, approach the village government to obtain permits and discuss the timing of meetings for the implementation of the technology extension / demonstration that will be implemented in view of the importance of time-gathering arrangements in this case the fishermen group.Extension and training activities can provide a view to the fisherman about the importance of post-arrest handling that is to maintain the quality of the fish in a cold state so it is not easily damaged or rotten. Counseling is given to the fishermen either individually or in groups. Conducted in groups in order that they can use this group in developing a capture fishery business can propose funding and / or equipment aid proposals through existing groups.Based on the results of observation, counseling and training, the activities of IbM Fishermen Group of Tateli II Village of Mandolang Sub-District of Minahasa Regency: 1. Fisherman Group of Tateli II Village of Mandolang Sub-district, have conducted fishing activities and there is desire from them all to use system where fish must be kept cool or keep it at a low temperature. 2. The fishermen group of Desa Tateli II Mandolang sub-district is able to understand that by maintaining the temperature of the fish remains cool the selling price can be high and apada can eventually increase their income. 3. Individual awareness as well as group members on the importance of group roles, spontaneously they want to submit fund and equipment proposal to the Government of North Sulawesi Province. Changes in attitude towards such development can provide a guarantee of the sustainability of their business so that the future can change the state of the economy and their daily circumstances and their families in a better direction.Keywords: ekstention, Female Workers AbstrakKegiatan Iptek bagi masyarakat ini bertujuan memberikan pengetahuan kepada mereka dalam menemukan pemecahan permasalahan. Tateli II merupakan salah satu desa yang berada di Desa Tateli II Kecamatan Mandolang Kabupaten Minahasa, Provinsi Sulawesi Utara. Nelayan desa Tateli II kerap kali atau sering bingung dengan pemasaran hasil perikanan karena harga jual yang selalu rendah; hal ini karena keadaan pengetahuan mereka yang rendah tentang penanganan pascapanen sehingga pendapatan selalu rendah. Nelayan harus diajarkan bagaimana cara menangani hasil tangkapan pascapanen supaya bila dijual akan menciptakan harga yang layak dan minimal bisa sesuai dengan hasil usaha. Salah satu usaha untuk menjaga mutu hasil perikanan produksi nelayan sejak dipanen sampai di tangan konsumen, dan ikan dalam keadaan segar/basah yaitu penanganan dengan system rantai dingin (cold chain system).Metode pelatihan dilakukan berdasarkan metode pembelajaran orang dewasa (otodidak) dan secara klasikal dengan memberikan teori dan praktek melalui ceramah dan diskusi kelompok (FGD: Focus Group Disscution). Pelaksanaannya dibuat dengan cara memberikan teori sebanyak 25% dan praktek sebanyak 75% selama 8 bulan.Pertama, melakukan pendekatan kepada pemerintah desa untuk mendapatkan ijin serta mendiskusikan tentang waktu pertemuan untuk pelaksanaan penyuluhan/demonstrasi teknologi yang akan diterapkan mengingat pentingnya pengaturan waktu mengumpulkan masa sekalipun dalam hal ini kelompok nelayan.Kegiatan penyuluhan dan pelatihan dapat memberikan pandangan kepada nelayan akan pentingnya penanganan pasca penangkapan yaitu harus mempertahankan mutu ikan dalam keadaan dingin sehingga tidak mudah rusak atau busuk. Penyuluhan diberikan kepada nelayan baik secara individyu ataupun secara berkelompok. Dilakukan secara berkelompok agar disuatu saat mereka bisa menggunakan kelompok ini dalam mengembangkan usaha perikanan tangkap dapat mengusulkan proposal bantuan dana dan atau peralatan melalui kelompok yang ada.Berdasarkan hasil pengamatan, penyuluhan dan pelatihan, maka kegiatan IbM Kelompok Nelayan Desa Tateli II Kecamatan Mandolang Kabupaten Minahasa : 1. Kelompok nelayan Desa Tateli II Kecamatan Mandolang, sudah melaksanakan kegiatan penangkapan ikan dan ada keinginan dari mereka semua untuk menggunakan sistem dimana ikan harus tetap dingin atau tetap pada suhu rendah. 2. Kelompok nelayan Desa Tateli II Kecamatan Mandolang mampu memahami bahwa dengan mempertahankan suhu ikan tetap dingin maka harga jual bisa tinggi dan apada akhirnya bisa meningkatkan pendapatan mereka. 3. Kesadaran secara individual dan juga anggota kelompok akan pentingnya peranan kelompok, secara spontanitas mereka ingin mengajukan proposal dana dan peralatan ke Pemerintah Provinsi Sulut. Perubahan sikap ke arah pengembangan demikian dapat memberikan jaminan keberlanjutan usaha mereka sehingga kedepannya bisa merubah keadaan perekonomian dan keadaan sehari-hari mereka dan keluarganya ke arah yang lebih baik.Kata Kunci : extensions, training, cold chain
As the capabilities of the mobile robots as well as their abilities to perform more tasks in an autonomous manner are increased, we need to think about the interactions that humans will have with these robots. Human-robot interaction (HRI) has recently received considerable attention in the academic community, government labs, technology companies, and through the media. The interdisciplinary nature of HRI requires researchers in the field to understand their research within a broader context. Since natural language is the easiest and most natural mode of communication for humans, it is desirable to use it to instruct the robot and to generate easy-to-understand messages for the user. Using natural language to teach a navigation task to a robot is an application of a more general instruction-based learning methodology. It can be used to instruct the robot with higher-level goals or to handle certain behaviors and modify their execution. One effective way is to describe the route to the robot in a multimodal way. On the other hand, significant progress has been made towards stable robotic bipedal walking in the last few years. This is creating an increased research interest in developing autonomous navigation strategies which are tailored specifically to humanoid robots. Efficient approaches to perception and motion planning, which are suited to the unique characteristics of bipedal humanoid robots and their typical operating environments, are receiving special interest. One important area of research involves the design of algorithms to compute robust navigation strategies for humanoid robots in human environments. Therefore, autonomous robot navigation based on route instruction is becoming an increasingly important research topic with regard to both humanoid and other mobile robots. In this dissertation, the problem of humanoid robot navigation in indoor environments is addressed. A complete framework is presented for humanoid robot navigation based on a multimodal cognitive interface. First, a spatial language to describe route-based navigation tasks for a mobile robot is proposed. This language is implemented to present an intuitive interface that enables novice users to easily and naturally describe a route to a mobile robot in indoor environments. An instruction interpreter is implemented to analyze the user's route to generate its equivalent symbolic and topological map representations which are used as an initial path estimation for the humanoid robot. Second, a robust lightweight object processing system with a high detection rate is developed. It can actually be used by mobile robots and meet their hard constraints to recognize landmarks during navigation. A landmark processing system is developed to detect, identify, and localize different types of landmarks during robot navigation in indoor or miniature city environments. The system is based on a two-step classification stage which is robust and invariant towards scaling and translations. By combining the strengths of appearance-based and model-based object classification techniques, it provides a good balance between fast processing time and high detection accuracy. Finally, a time-efficient hybrid motion planning system for a humanoid robot in indoor environments is implemented. The proposed technique is a combination of sampling-based planner and D* Lite search to generate dynamic footstep placements in unknown environments. A modified cylinder model is used to approximate the trajectory for the robot's body-center during navigation. It calculates the actual distances required to execute different actions of the robot and compares them to the distances from the nearest obstacles. D* Lite search is then used to find dynamic and low-cost footstep placements within the resulting configuration space. ; Da die Fähigkeiten von mobilen Robotern einschließlich ihrer Möglichkeiten, Aufgaben autonom durchzuführen, erweitert wurden, muss die Interaktion zwischen Mensch und Roboter neu betrachtet werden. Human-Robot-Interaction (HRI) ist ein aktuelles Thema in der Forschung, in Technologie-Unternehmen und in den Medien. Der interdisziplinäre Charakter des HRI-Bereiches erfordert Forschung innerhalb eines breiten Themenkomplexes. Da natürliche Sprache das einfachste und natürlichste Mittel der Kommunikation für Menschen ist, ist es wünschenswert, diese Form der Kommunikation auch bei der HRI zu nutzen, um einem Roboter Anweisungen zu geben und leicht verständliche Botschaften für den Benutzer zu generieren. Die Verwendung natürlicher Sprache zur Instruierung bei Navigations-Aufgaben ist eine Anwendung einer allgemeineren instruktions-basierten Lernmethodologie. Dem Roboter können so übergeordnete Ziele mitgeteilt werden, bestimmte Verhaltensweisen geändert oder auch die Ausführung einzelner Aktionen modifiziert werden. Eine effiziente Methode zur Beschreibung der Route ist die Verwendung multimodaler Anweisungen. Weil die vergangenen Jahre einen bedeutenden Fortschritt auf dem Gebiet der humanoiden Roboter und des stabilen zweibeinigen Gehens gebracht haben, besteht ein verstärktes Forschungsinteresse an der Entwicklung autonomer Navigationsstrategien, die speziell auf humanoide Roboter zugeschnitten sind. Von besonderem Interesse sind effiziente Ansätze zur kombinierten Perzeptions- und Aktionsplanung, die an die speziellen Eigenschaften von zweibeinigen humanoiden Robotern und ihre typischen Betriebsumgebungen angepasst sind. Ein wichtiges Gebiet der Forschung ist der Entwurf von Algorithmen zur Berechnung von robusten Navigations-Strategien für humanoide Roboter in menschlicher Umgebung. Aus diesem Grunde ist die auf Routen-Instruktion beruhende autonome Roboter-Navigation ein zunehmend interessantes Thema im Hinblick auf humanoide und andere mobile Roboter. Diese Dissertation befasst sich mit dem Problem der humanoiden Roboter-Navigation in Innenräumen. Es wird ein komplettes Framework für humanoide Roboter-Navigation basierend auf einer multimodalen Schnittstelle vorgestellt. Zunächst wird eine formale Sprache eingeführt, mit der die routen-basierten Navigationsaufgaben beschrieben werden können. Diese Sprache stellt eine intuitive Schnittstelle bereit, mit der auch unerfahrene Anwender leicht einen mobilen Roboter in einer Route in Innenräumen instruieren können. Ein Befehls-Interpreter analysiert die Benutzer-Eingabe und generiert entsprechende symbolische und topologische Darstellungen, die als erste Pfad-Schätzung für den humanoiden Roboter verwendet werden. Des Weiteren wird in dieser Arbeit ein robustes und effizientes Objekterkennungssystem mit einer hohen Erkennungsrate entwickelt. Es kann bei mobilen Robotern eingesetzt werden und erfüllt die Anforderung, Landmarken während der Navigation zu erkennen. Das Landmarken-Detektions-System ist in der Lage, während der Roboter-Navigation in einer Miniatur-Stadt verschiedene Typen von Landmarken zu detektieren, identifizieren und zu lokalisieren. Das System basiert auf einem zweistufigen Klassifikations-Prozess, der robust und invariant gegenüber Skalierung und Translation ist. Durch die Kombination der Stärken der erscheinungs-basierten und modell-basierten Objekt-Klassifikation bietet es einen guten Kompromiss zwischen schnellen Bearbeitungszeiten und hoher Erkennungsgenauigkeit. Ebenfalls Bestandteil dieser Arbeit ist die Implementierung eines zeiteffizienten hybriden Bewegungs-Planungs-Systems für humanoide Roboter in einer Innenraum-Umgebung. Die vorgeschlagene Technik ist eine Kombination aus Sampling-basierter Planung und "D * Lite"-Suche, die ermöglicht, dynamisch Tritt-Platzierungen in unbekannten Umgebungen zu erzeugen. Ein modifiziertes Zylinder-Modell wird verwendet, um die Trajektorie des Roboters während der Navigation näherungsweise zu bestimmen. Die Planungskomponente berechnet die benötigten Freiräume, um verschiedene Aktionen des Roboters auszuführen und vergleicht sie mit der aktuellen Entfernung zu den nächstgelegenen Hindernissen. "D* Lite"-Suche wird dann verwendet, um eine dynamische und effiziente Platzierung der Schritte innerhalb des resultierenden Konfigurations-Raumes zu finden.
El punto de partida ha sido conocer y reflexionar sobre los motivos por los que una gran parte del profesorado parecía mostrar cierta resistencia para contribuir a "la normalización"1 de las TICs en la clase de inglés, aun contando con los recursos materiales necesarios. Para ello comenzamos una investigación basada en la elaboración de cuestionarios enviados a todos los profesores de inglés que componen la plantilla de los centros de Enseñanza Secundaria públicos y concertados de la provincia de Badajoz; de entrevistas realizadas a un grupo de estos profesores, y del estudio de documentos oficiales sobre enseñanza secundaria, publicados por la propia Consejería de Educación de la Junta de Extremadura y por el Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, junto con el CNICE, en España. El trabajo se ha estructurado en tres partes, con un total de ocho capítulos, presentados de la siguiente manera: 1) En primer lugar, se ha elaborado el planteamiento del problema en torno al que se ha realizado toda la investigación, identificando las cuestiones que van a servir de orientación y guía para la misma. 2) En segundo lugar, y dentro de la primera parte, está el contexto de la investigación, en el que se hace un análisis de dos de los documentos oficiales en materia de educación más relevantes, prestando especial atención a la utilización de las TICs en la Enseñanza Secundaria. El primero de ellos realizado en la comunidad de Extremadura y, el segundo, en todo el territorio nacional. Ambos nos van a permitir entender el panorama educativo actual en el que se enmarca nuestro estudio. 3) A continuación, la segunda parte, sobre fundamentación teórica, que contiene todos los temas relacionados con el objeto de estudio. Se estructura en tres capítulos que van desde la importancia de las TICs y del carácter innovador con el que impregnan el proceso de enseñanza y aprendizaje; el estudio de las actitudes del profesorado en general hacia la utilización de las TICs y ante las reformas educativas; y por último, un capítulo dedicado a la normalización de las TICs en la enseñanza de las lenguas y a su integración en el currículo. 4) La tercera parte, que consta de cuatro capítulos, aborda todo el proceso de investigación, y en él se establecen las bases de la metodología utilizada; la presentación de los datos de cuestionarios y entrevistas, y la discusión y análisis de los resultados que se obtienen en los mismos y que se realizan considerando los objetivos e hipótesis propuestos en la investigación. En este capítulo se incluyen además las referencias del "Análisis del Debate Educativo" en Enseñanza Secundaria en Extremadura, necesarias para realizar la triangulación de resultados. Por último, las conclusiones que se derivan del análisis y las propuestas de mejora. ; The starting point has been to know and reflect on the reasons why a large part of the teaching staff seemed to show some resistance to contributing to the "standardisation "1 of ICTs in the English class, even though they had the necessary material resources. To do so, we began an investigation based on the elaboration of questionnaires sent to all the English teachers who make up the staff of public and subsidized Secondary Schools in the province of Badajoz; on interviews carried out with a group of these teachers, and on the study of official documents on Secondary Education, published by the Department of Education of the Regional Government of Extremadura and by the Ministry of Education and Science, together with the CNICE, in Spain. The work has been structured in three parts, with a total of eight chapters, presented as follows: 1) Firstly, the approach to the problem around which all the research has been carried out has been developed, identifying the issues that will guide and guide the research. 2) Secondly, and within the first part, there is the context of the research, in which an analysis is made of two of the most relevant official documents in the field of education, paying special attention to the use of ICTs in Secondary Education. The first one was carried out in the Community of Extremadura and the second one in the whole national territory. Both will allow us to understand the current educational panorama in which our study is framed. 3) Next, the second part, on theoretical foundations, which contains all the topics related to the object of study. It is structured into three chapters, ranging from the importance of ICTs and the innovative nature with which they permeate the teaching and learning process; the study of teacher attitudes in general towards the use of ICTs and towards educational reforms; and finally, a chapter devoted to the standardisation of ICTs in language teaching and their integration into the curriculum. 4) The third part, which consists of four chapters, deals with the entire research process, establishing the basis of the methodology used; the presentation of data from questionnaires and interviews, and the discussion and analysis of the results obtained from these, which are carried out in the light of the objectives and hypotheses proposed in the research. This chapter also includes the references of the "Analysis of the Educational Debate" in Secondary Education in Extremadura, necessary to carry out the triangulation of results. Finally, the conclusions derived from the analysis and the proposals for improvement.
Introduction: Internal conflict has become the predominant threat to the security and stability of many of the small island nations of the Southwest Pacific and particularly in the countries of Melanesia. Since the late 1980s, conflicts of varying causes and degrees of intensity have occurred in Papua New Guinea (Bougainville secession attempt), Fiji (coups and attempted coups), Vanuatu (police rebellion) and Solomon Islands (ethnic conflict and coup). These events have seriously debilitated the already fragile national economies and polities of all countries, so much so in the Solomon Islands that that country is now being described by many analysts as a failing, if not failed, state. While most of these countries have so far been able (not without difficulty) to maintain a measure of state integrity, the situation in Solomon Islands has become so precarious that Australia and New Zealand (with the support of most Pacific Island governments and anticipating a request from the Solomons parliament) are preparing to intervene in an attempt to restore the rule of law and rebuild administrative institutions. The form of that intervention is not yet clear - it is thought likely to include up to 2,000 armed military and police with a large team of civilian technical personnel nor has a mandate been determined. In this context a host of questions arises as to how best to resolve, contain, manage and/or transform these internal conflicts in the interest of the security, stability and well-being of the peoples of the countries concerned and of the region as a whole. What are the ways out - or ways through - such conflicts? What are the appropriate domestic strategies, policies and mechanisms for resolving conflict and producing stability? Are they sufficient to the task? What roles can (and should) regional states play in helping states manage, settle or ameliorate internal conflict? Is external intervention the answer? What is the likely impact of such intervention? Is there a regional security architecture that might be useful in these circumstances? Is there a role for NGOs? Is conflict prevention possible? And if so, how? Do the answers not lie in a holistic approach to improving the processes of economic development and governance? And if so what agencies and policies are most likely to bring this about? How has the region responded to date? These questions deserve serious consideration and doubtless many will have been explored in presentations and discussions at this conference. The purpose of this paper is to consider one form of conflict management undertaken recently in the region; that is, the peace monitoring interventions by Australia, New Zealand and some Pacific Island Countries (PICs) in Bougainville and Solomon Islands. How useful have these exercises been in assisting peace processes and in conflict management/peace construction, and what lessons can be drawn from them for any future such operations - including perhaps for the more vigorous co-operative intervention currently in prospect? From 1997 to 2003, the Truce Monitoring Group (TMG) and later the Peace Monitoring Group (PMG), consisting of unarmed Australian, New Zealand and Pacific Islands military and civilian personnel, provided support to and helped facilitate the peace process in Bougainville. These external groups, numbering from 250 to 300 personnel at various points in time, were agreed to by the parties to the Burnham and Lincoln peace conferences held in 1997 and 1998. In Solomon Islands, following the conclusion of the Townsville Peace Agreement (TPA) in October 2000 to mid-2002, an International Peace Monitoring Team (IPMT) comprising 50 unarmed police and civilian personnel from Australia, New Zealand and other PICs, was established to work in support of the indigenous Peace Monitoring Council (PMC) that had also been set up by the parties to the TPA to advance the cause of peace. While the specific mandates and responsibilities of the PMG and IPMT differed and the resources available to the two operations also differed substantially the expectation of the signatories to the peace agreements was that by providing a neutral, physical presence, by undertaking community confidence-building activities, and by facilitating contact between stakeholders in the respective peace processes, these interventions would help consolidate peace and reduce the prospect of renewed fighting. Note that these were not coercive interventions or humanitarian interventions in which armed forces under, for example, United Nations or regional agency command are inserted into a civil conflict to stop fighting and bloodshed and to make or keep the peace. They were unarmed and neutral monitoring operations consisting of military, police and civilian personnel inserted after peace agreements had been reached between combatants and authorities. These were a type of intervention designed to assist in conflict management and amelioration as part of the larger peace process rather than as the prime mover of the process.(At times, however, the PMG saw it as its responsibility to help maintain, or re-start, the momentum of the process when it flagged). Note also that in attempting to learn and apply lessons from one countrys conflict to anothers, methodological difficulties arise. Conflicts and resolutions are often context specific and the factors in play in one conflict/post-conflict situation do not always translate well to others. But while there are obvious limits to comparisons, it is nonetheless possible to generate at least some rules of thumb, particularly since there has been (a) such a large number of monitoring interventions of various kinds and (b) that the learning of lessons especially from UN operations has become something of an industry. ; AusAID
Die Inhalte der verlinkten Blogs und Blog Beiträge unterliegen in vielen Fällen keiner redaktionellen Kontrolle.
Warnung zur Verfügbarkeit
Eine dauerhafte Verfügbarkeit ist nicht garantiert und liegt vollumfänglich in den Händen der Herausgeber:innen. Bitte erstellen Sie sich selbständig eine Kopie falls Sie diese Quelle zitieren möchten.
Pınar Bilgin on Non-Western IR, Hybridity, and the One-Toothed Monster called Civilization
Questions of civilization underpin much of IR scholarship—whether explicitly (in terms of the construction of non-Western 'others') or implicitly (in the assumption that provincial institutions from Europe constitute a universal model of how we ought to relate to one another in international politics). While this topic surfaces frequently in debates about postcolonial international politics, few scholars are able to tackle this conundrum with the same sense of acuteness as Pınar Bilgin. In this Talk, she—amongst others—elaborates on not doing Turkish IR, what postsecular IR comprises, and discusses her own position in regards to that one-toothed monster called civilization.
Print version of this Talk (pdf)
What is, according to you, the biggest challenge / principal debate in current IR? What is your position or answer to this challenge / in this debate?
What I think is the biggest challenge in current IR is not so much a debate, but the difficulty for students of IR to come up with ways of making sense of the world in a way that appreciates different experiences and sensibilities and others' contributions and contestations. International Relations as we know it at the moment and as offered in the standard textbooks, portrays a world that they really don't recognize as the world that they live in. And I should point out that I am not just speaking of Non-Western experiences and sensibilities—there is in any case a growing body of literature on Non-Western IR, and you have spoken to Amitav Acharya (Theory Talk #42), Siba Grovogui (Theory Talk #57) and others—but I am also referring to all those perspectives in which international knowledge are presented and which the textbooks do not usually reflect, including feminist perspectives for instance (such as Ann Tickner, Theory Talk #54), or perspectives from the Global South some of which actually fall into the definition of 'the West'. So when I speak of ways of making sense of the world in a way that appreciates different experiences and sensibilities, I am referring to the agenda of Critical Theory of IR. I do think we have come a long way since the early 1990s when I was a student of IR and Critical Theory was beginning to make its mark then, but we still have a long way to go. For instance, critical approaches to security have come a long way in terms of considering insecurities of specific social groups that mainstream approaches overlook, but it has a long way to go still in terms of actually incorporating insecurities as viewed by those people, instead of just explaining them away.
As for the principal debate in IR, the debate that goes on in my mind is how to study IR in a way that appreciates different experiences and sensibilities and acknowledges other contributions as well as contestations. This is not the principal debate in the field, but the field that comes closest is the one that I try and contribute to, and that is the field of non-Western approaches to IR. It is not exactly a debate, of course, in the sense that the very mainstream Western approaches that it targets are not paying any attention. So it's the critics themselves who have their disagreements, and on the one hand there are those who point to other ways of thinking about the international, Stephen Chan comes to mind as the producer of one of the early examples of that. I can think of Robbie Shilliam's more recent book on the subject, thinking about the international from non-Western perspectives. On the other hand are those who survey IR in different parts of the world, to see how it is done, what their concerns and debates are. Ole Waever, Arlene Tickner and David Blaney's three-volume series 'Worlding Beyond the West' contains materials from both these directions.
My own approach is slightly different in that while acknowledging the limits of our approaches to IR as any critical IR person would, I don't necessarily think that turning to others' 'authentic' perspectives to look for different ways of thinking about the international is the way forward for students of IR. That brings me to back the way I set up the challenge to IR today: it is about incorporating others' perspectives, as well as acknowledging their contributions and contestations. I think I would like to take a more historical approach to this. It's not just about contemporary differences—studies on these are very valuable and I learn a lot from them—but what I've also found very valuable are connections: how much give and take has already taken place over the years, how for instance the roots of human rights can be found in multiple places in our history and in different parts of the world, how the Human Rights Convention was penned by multiple actors, how human rights norms don't go deep enough and how calls for deepening them have in fact emerged from different parts of the world, not just the West. So these contributions can actually point to our history and to different perspectives across the globe, but these are often referred to as non-Western IR, whereas they're actually pointing to our conversations, our communication, the give and take between us. That is what I am mainly interested in at the moment: the multiple authorship of ideas, and pointing to them you actually face the biggest challenge. It builds on Edward Said's legacy, so it's a critical IR project, the way I see it: Said built on multiple beginnings and engaged in contrapuntal reading. I should add that when I am talking about 'sensibilities', I am not necessarily talking about it with reference to other parts of the world, although it may seem this way. The more reflexive approaches to IR have taught us that we are all shaped by and all respond to our contexts—in one way or another.
One interesting result of Arlene Tickner's and Ole Waever's book, International Relations Scholarship around the World, was that IR in different parts of the world is not in fact that different: it is still state-centric, it talks about security in the way that most mainstream textbooks would talk about it, and IR courses are structured in such a way that you would be able to recognize in most parts of the world. Such surveys, therefore, tell us that IR works quite similarly in other parts of the world. Hence the need to look for difference in alternative sources and the need to look beyond IR—towards anthropology, sociology, linguistics, etc.—there is growing interest in conceptions of the international beyond what IR allows us. This is not confined to looking beyond the West, but is equally emerging in Western scholarship: there is now emerging literature on postsecularism and IR, and bringing religion back into the study of IR. However, I am not so much interested in studying differences (without underestimating the significance of such studies) but studying to our conversations, our communication, the give and take between us.
How did you arrive at where you currently are in IR?
My journey to this point has been through critical security studies. I studied international relations at Middle East Technical University in Ankara and did a Master's Degree Bilkent University in Ankara where I currently work. I was not entirely comfortable with IR as an undergraduate student, thought I could not quite put my finger on the reason why—though I was able to make sense of during my later studies. At the undergraduate level, I received an interdisciplinary training, not so much by design but rather by accident: I picked courses on political theory, economic history and political anthropology, simply because our curriculum allowed such a design. I was lucky to have interesting people teaching interesting courses. And again by sheer coincidence we had a visiting professor who introduced me to philosophy of science and the work of Thomas Kuhn and I began to question the standard IR training I had been receiving. So then I went on to an MA degree at Bilkent University which became consequential for me in two ways: for one, that University has the best IR library in Turkey, so there are no limits to what you can learn even when you are left to your own devices, and secondly, Hollis and Smith's Explaining and Understanding International Relations (1991) was on our reading list. So when I began reading that against the background of Thomas Kuhn, I began to make sense of IR in a very different way. Mind you, I was still not able to see my future in IR at that time.
Then I began writing my MA dissertation and was also working at Turkey's then very powerful semi-military institution the MGK, the National Security Council, at the General Secretariat: I was hired as a junior researcher and lasted for about four-and-a-half months, and then I went abroad for further studies, but those months were what set me on my path to Critical Security Studies. Working there, I began to appreciate the need for reflexivity, and the difficult role of the researcher, and the relationship between theory and practice. At that point I received a Chevening scholarship from the British Council, and the condition attached was that I could not use it towards PhD studies but had to use it for a one-year degree. I decided to study something that I could not study at home, and came across Ken Booth's work ('Security and Emancipation,' 1991) and knew of course Barry Buzan's oeuvre (Theory Talk #35), and found that Aberystwyth University offered a one-year degree in Strategic Studies, which is what I decided to do. That happened to be the first year they offered an Master's degree in Critical Security Studies, and I became one of the first five students to take that course, taught jointly by Ken Booth, Richard Wyn Jones and Nicholas Wheeler. Together with Steve Smith, who was Head of Department at the time, they were committed to giving us an excellent education, so it was a great place to be and I stayed on to do my PhD there as well. It's a small Welsh town with only 13,000 people and the University has about the same number of students. During that time I read important examples of critical IR scholarship, as well as the newly emerging literature on Security Studies, and it was around that time that Michael Williams (Theory Talk #39) joined the Department and he was a great influence on my work, as was of course my dissertation advisor Ken Booth: I learned a lot from him in terms of substance and style.
After receiving my PhD in the year 2000 I joined the IR department at Bilkent University as the only critical theorist there. Bilkent was at the time one of the few universities in Turkey committed to excellence in research—now there are more—and that allowed me the academic freedom to pursue my research interests in Critical Security Studies: I was able to focus on my work without having to spread out into other fields. It helped that I became part of research networks as well: I've already mentioned Arlene Tickner's and Ole Waever's work, their project on geocultural epistemologies in IR and 'Worlding beyong the West'. Ole Waever invited me to join, thus opening up my second research agenda since my PhD, enriched by workshops and conversations with scholars in the group. It is not far removed from my core work, but it is an added dimension. And this helped me over time to overcome my earlier doubts about IR, for I began to see just how multidisciplinary it was. It was only through Critical IR that I learned how parallel perspectives in other disciplines, and alternative ideas could be brought to bear on IR—something you also find nowadays in international political sociology or different aspects of anthropology in constructivism.
What would a student need to become a specialist in IR or understand the world in a global way?
In terms of skills, I think that studying at different institutions if possible, different settings with different academic traditions helps a lot. Institutions vary widely in their emphasis—Bilkent for instance believes that the best teachers are those who do cutting-edge research. Others may disagree and say that small teaching colleges are the best, because they pass on what they specialise in. I think therefore that studying at different institutions is very good for students, whether it be within formal exchange frameworks or acquiring fellowships for study away, not to mention of course fieldwork, which offers new settings: every new environment is an important learning experience, even if the substance is not so useful and what you learn is not necessarily so significant. Secondly, some would suggest learning a different language is important, along with acquiring a foothold in area studies and comparative studies, and I agree with that. Thirdly, Stefano Guzzini talks about IR theory being what a student needs in terms of disposition and skills: he has this piece in the Journal of International Relations and Development (2001), where he makes the case specifically for would-be diplomats in Central and Eastern European countries that by learning theory, students would be equipped to communicate across cultural boundaries—it's like learning a new language. They would learn to watch out against ethnocentrism, he argues, and this is one of the pieces I use when I teach IR theory. In this spirit, I think it important to use theory as a new language, as one of the tools that every student should have in their toolkit. And finally, I think I'd follow Cynthia Enloe's (Theory Talk #48) recommendation that it's useful to have a foot both in IR theory and in comparative studies. I feel that one without the other is less rewarding, though one will not know what one is missing until one goes to explore.
In my PhD work I focused on the Middle East, since then I have looked more in depth at Europe's relationship with the Euro-Mediterranean relations and Turkey-EU relations as empirical points of reference. This has been enriching and has benefited my research. In sum, it is essential to read as broadly as possible, and I give the same advice to my M.A. and to my PhD students. You can't read everything, and it can happen that the more we read the more confused we get, but in this Theory Talks is doing a great job by allowing students to learn from the experience of others. Learning happens also at conferences: you may find subjects that are of no interest to you, but that is helpful also, and on the other hand new subjects will broaden horizons. The wealth of cultural references in each part of the world can be baffling and may make it difficult to delve deep. The only way we make sense of the unknown through what we know.
What regional or perhaps even global protagonism can you envisage for IR studies emerging from Turkey? Turkey is often perceived to bridge Europe and the Middle East, Europe and Asia, but we have the problem that Asia itself is a Western idea, then a 'bridge' is in danger of belonging to neither.
As I made clear in what I said above, I don't think of IR in terms of contributions emerging from this part of the world or that part of the world. And although I grew up in Turkey and began my academic career there, I don't consider my own work to be in any way a 'Turkish perspective' on IR. What can be said to be Turkish about my perspective is that I have to travel to Aberystwyth and Copenhagen and all those ISA conference locations to discover that I can have (and some say I should) have a Turkish perspective. My undergraduate education was about learning IR as a 'universally undisputed'. I now know the limitations of that universalism, but I cannot offer a specifically located perspective, for it is a complicated picture that emerges in front of us. I am not in favour of replacing one parochialism with another one, in terms of those who speak of X School of IR versus Y School of IR.
Having said that, I consider that my contribution as being comfortable with what Orhan Pamuk has called the 'in-between world', though I prefer to use the term 'hybridity', not in-between-ness. That Turkish policy-makers have always claimed a bridge status for their country, but these ideas are rooted in Turkey's hybridity and belonging to multiple worlds (as opposed to being in between multiple worlds). Policy-makers can talk about being a bridge between Europe and Asia, or Europe and the Middle East, because Turkey in fact belongs to all these worlds. So in some ways being at ease with this hybridity does allow me to have a particular perspective in IR that I may not have had if I had come from a different background. But then again, it's difficult to know. I have taken courses in political anthropology, learning about the Ottoman Empire and modern Turkey as an imagined community, but all my introductions to geocultural studies and epistemology came from Critical IR settings, so looking for geographically or culturally specific roots simply doesn't work. As Said put it, it is 'beginnings' that we should be looking for, not 'origins.'
When Europeans and North Americans speak of 'state building' and 'development', Turkey is often taken as a model example of conversion to Western models—largely by its own choice. Should Turkey's path and modern reality be understood differently?
I am not comfortable with the word 'model', but 'example' may be a preferable term. So what is Turkey an example of? That has become a particular research question for me and I have written on this—Turkey's choice to locate itself in the West and what that means. Turkey is interesting for having decided to locate itself in the West, and this is where language and culture come in the picture. More often than not, the literature tends to assume that elites in places like Turkey would make the decision to adopt the 'Western model', and the rationale for adopting that model is not questioned, but instead taken to be 'obvious' from development theory and its teleological outlook: 'it just happened'. It is those that do not adopt the dominant model, those that decide against Westernization, that need explaining. Perhaps I would not have asked myself that question, had I not—and here my biography comes into the picture—been puzzled by references to 'civilization' in Turkish texts. If you look into Turkish literature or historical documents you will find references to 'civilization' everywhere—the national anthem refers to civilization as a 'one-toothed monster called civilization'. As a young student, I just couldn't make sense of this and wondered why is everyone talking about civilization and why is it a good and a difficult thing at the same time?
I began to make sense of this as I was researching Turkey's choices about secularism in the late 19th and early 20th century, and was looking at some of those documents once again, but this time with insights provided by postcolonial IR. The language commonly used was 'joining' the West, and secularisation was a part of the package, but it was not necessarily a question of mere emulation but search for security, being a part of the 'international society'. These were not easy decisions, so here I look at Turkey's choice to locate itself in the West within the security context. There was a notion of a 'standard of civilization' in Europe and the West more broadly which others were expected to 'live up to', and this gives you some sense of the ubiquity of the references to civilization in the discourses of Turkish policy makers at the time. I am not suggesting that this is the whole answer, and I do not reject distinct answers, but I do think it helps understand Turkey's decision to locate itself in the West in the early 20th century. So this is where my security aspects of my work and Critical IR together. My starting point is to identify the ubiquity of one notion and then locate that within critical IR theory. Turkey becomes an example of postcolonial insecurities. Though never having been colonized it nonetheless exhibits those 'postcolonial anxieties' in Sankaran Krishna's words.
I am keenly aware of the reality that even when we as academics are doing our most theoretical and abstract work, we are never removed from the roles of the 'real world', for we are teachers at the same time: by the time we put our ideas to paper we have already disseminated them through our teaching. Some of us are more committed to teaching than others, of course, but some critical theorists see the most important part of their job as being good educators and training the new generation, as opposed to being more public intellectuals and writing op-ed pieces and talking to bigger audiences. We are therefore never far removed from the world of practice and from disseminating our ideas about security and international relations, because we are teachers, and some of our students will go on to work in the real world institutions, like government or the media.
Beyond that, there is a growing vitality in the literature on the privatisation of security: on private armies and how security is being privatised and fielded out to professionals. The new literature that is emerging on this is more and more interesting, I am thinking for instance of Anna Leander's work here: she talks about privatization of security not only in terms of the involvement of private professionals going off to do what government or other actors tell them to do, but also in terms of the setting up of security agendas and shaping security, determining what threats are, and determining what risks are and quite literally how we should be leading our lives. In this sense theory and critical security studies have become very real for all of us, because no one group of people owns the definitions.
Currently I am working on a manuscript that brings together two of my research interests, conceptions of the international beyond the West and Critical Security Studies. I use the case of Turkey for purposes of illustration but also for insight. I am trying to think of ways of studying security that are attentive to the periphery's conceptions of the international as a source of (non-material) insecurity.
Pınar Bilgin is the author of Regional Security in the Middle East: a Critical Perspective (Routledge, 2005) and over 50 papers. She is an Associate Member of the Turkish Academy of Sciences. She received the Young Scientists Incentive Award of the Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TÜBITAK) in 2009 and 'Young Scientist' (GEBIP) award of Turkish Academy of Sciences (TÜBA, 2008). She served as the President of Central and East European International Studies Association (CEEISA), and chair of International Political Sociology Section of ISA. She is a Member of the Steering Committee of Standing Group on International Relations (SGIR) and an Associate Editor of International Political Sociology.
Related links
Faculty Profile at Bilkent University Read Bilgin's Thinking Past 'Western' IR? (2008) here (pdf) Read Bilgin's A Return to 'Civilisational Geopolitics' in the Mediterranean? Changing Geopolitical Images of the European Union and Turkey in the Post-Cold War Era (2004) here (pdf) Read Bilgin's Whose 'Middle East'? Geopolitical Inventions and Practices of Security (2004) here (pdf) Read Bilgin's and A.D. Morton's Historicising representations of 'Failed States': beyong the cold-war annexation of the social sciences? (2002) here (pdf)