Duties Owed: Low-Intensity Cyber Attacks and Liability for Transboundary Torts in International Law
In: 126 Yale Law Journal, Issue 5
1286661 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: 126 Yale Law Journal, Issue 5
SSRN
In: Journal of Risk and Insurance, forthcoming
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
In: Principles of European tort law 7
In: Studies in international law volume 70
"The ever-growing interaction between member States and international organisations results, all too often, in situations of non-conformity with international law (eg peacekeeping operations, international economic adjustment programmes, counter-terrorism sanctions). Seven years after the finalisation of the International Law Commission's Articles on the Responsibility of International Organisations (ARIO), international law on the allocation of international responsibility between these actors still remains unsettled. The confusion around the nature and normative calibre of the relevant rules, the paucity of relevant international practice supporting them and the lack of a clear and principled framework for their elaboration impairs their application and restricts their ability to act as effective regulatory formulas. This study aims to offer doctrinal clarity in this area of law and purports to serve as a point of reference for all those with a vested interest in the topic. For the first time since the publication of the ARIO, all international responsibility issues dealing with interactions between member States and international organisations are put together in one book under a common approach. Structured around a systematisation of the interactions between these actors, the study provides an analytical framework for the regulation of indirect responsibility scenarios. Based on the ideas of the intellectual fathers of international law, such as Scelle's 'dédoublement fonctionnel' theory and Ago's 'derivative responsibility' model, the book employs old ideas to add original argumentation to a topic that has been dealt with extensively by recent commentators."--Bloomsbury Publishing
List of Abbreviations --Acknowledgements --Introduction --The Need for Reform: The Current EU Legal Framework --Digging Deeper: The National Norms on Intermediary Accessory Liability --Back to the Basics: The Elements of a European Accessory Liability --Shaping European Intermediary Accessory Copyright Liability: What Would a Reasonable Intermediary Do? --Summary and Conclusion --Bibliography.
In: American journal of international law, Band 105, Heft 4, S. 799-805
ISSN: 0002-9300
In: Legal aspects of international organizations volume 58
Introduction -- Three illustrative cases - facts and questions -- Overview of the key moments in the development of NATO -- Current institutional framework of NATO and NATO's decision making process -- The international legal personality of NATO -- Binding international obligations relevant to NATO's operations -- Attribution of wrongful acts to NATO -- Conclusions and recommendations
In: Development in practice, Band 5, Heft 1, S. 58-60
ISSN: 1364-9213
In: Development in practice, Band 5, Heft 1
ISSN: 0961-4524
In: Restatement of the law, third
In: Torts
In: Products liability [Hauptbd.]
In: Journal of High Technology Law, Vol. 22(2): 321-353.
SSRN
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 105, Heft 4, S. 799-805
ISSN: 2161-7953
This Article examines the interactions between European Community and national law, in the context of Member State public tort liability. Specifically, the Article analyzes Brasserie du Pecheur v. Federal Republic of Germany, a case that pitted German beer purity legislation against requirements of Community law. In that case, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled that acts or omissions of the national legislator may, under certain conditions, give rise to Member State public tort liability, which is adjudicated in the national court systems. The German Federal Court of Justice dismissed the case after finding that the conditions of state liability were not met under either German or Community law. The Article discusses in detail the nature and characteristics of the Member State liability principle conceived by the ECJ; despite the silence of treaty law on this issue, the ECJ has long supported the notion that a Member State may incur tort liability for breaching community law. As a result of ECJ jurisprudence, supranational judge-made law may deeply permeate domestic legal orders. However, the German court's dismissal of the damages claim in Brasserie du Pecheur demonstrates that Member State liability is not open-ended. Rather, a balance may be achieved between European Community (EC) compliance interests and Member State domestic institutional prerogatives.
BASE