Free Market Fairness
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 75, Heft 2
ISSN: 0022-3816
11311 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 75, Heft 2
ISSN: 0022-3816
In: Policy review: the journal of American citizenship, Heft 175
ISSN: 0146-5945
SSRN
In: Brookings Global Economy and Development Working Paper No. 40
SSRN
Working paper
In: Berliner Republik: das Debattenmagazin, Heft 2, S. 46-55
ISSN: 1616-4903
In: Social research: an international quarterly, Band 73, Heft 2, S. 365-376
ISSN: 0037-783X
In: Social research: an international quarterly, Band 73, Heft 2, S. 597-606
ISSN: 0037-783X
In: Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik: Monatszeitschrift, Band 51, Heft 4, S. 400-404
ISSN: 0006-4416
World Affairs Online
In: Renewal: politics, movements, ideas ; a journal of social democracy, Band 12, Heft 4, S. 53-55
ISSN: 0968-252X
In: European journal of international law, Band 13, Heft 4, S. 909-925
ISSN: 1464-3596
In: Annual review of political science, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 425-449
ISSN: 1545-1577
▪ Abstract Justice is a concept at the core of many fundamental debates in political and ethical theory. In this essay I consider what is at stake in one important debate, the effort to divorce conceptions of justice from conceptions of the good. Focusing primarily on the work of John Rawls, I analyze the underlying logic of arguments based on the notion that principles of justice can be the product of "reasonable agreement" among people who hold conflicting conceptions of the good. In doing so I consider four primary criticisms of the argument: The project is a false one in that, while it purports to be neutral, it in fact gives primacy to a particular, liberal, individualistic conception of the good on which the project is grounded; the project is inadequate because its construction of the deliberation and decision-making process fails to take account of important social factors; the project is misguided in that it fails to take account of actual social practices and, thus, fails to capture the complexity of the demands on a theory of justice; and the project is destined to fail because a theory of justice adequate to the challenges of modern society cannot be constructed in an abstract, thought-experiment way.
In: Social research: an international quarterly, Band 65, Heft 1, S. 55
ISSN: 0037-783X
In: Annual review of political science, Band 1, S. 425-450
ISSN: 1094-2939
In: Swiss review of world affairs, Band 47, Heft 7, S. 19-20