Suchergebnisse

Organized rape in armed conflict is one of the most serious violations of human rights, which creates a clear crisis in the identity of the other party and solidifies the sense of bitterness of defeat. Rape in armed conflicts is thus different from that of others, which can have a negative impact on social and international peace and security. Conservative and racially conservative societies are also affected by systematic organized gang rape, which occurs systematically from parties to a non-international armed conflict or within the policy of the aggressor State in the event of an international armed conflict. In contrast to the efforts made by the United Nations to curb organized rape, regional organizations have made little effort in this direction. The role of regional organizations in the framework of Chapter VIII of the UN. Charter in reducing armed conflicts and protecting human rights, and in cooperation of the United Nations and the Security Council in the task of maintaining international peace and security. The European Convention on Human Rights has established a mechanism to monitor the extent to which individuals enjoy their rights and freedoms and the extent to which States parties respect them. The US Convention on Human Rights followed the same approach as the European Convention, but through the regulatory body of the American Commission on Human Rights and the American Court of Human Rights. Although women and children suffered systematic rape as a result of armed conflict on the African continent, the African Charter on Human Rights did not provide the necessary mechanisms to curb crimes of sexual violence, and the Arab Charter on Human Rights did not play a role in the face of organized rape. We therefore considered the adequacy of the provisions of the International Bill and the mechanisms of action of regional organizations in curbing the crimes of sexual violence, organized rape in particular in places of non-international armed conflict, and whether organized rape can be considered a violation of personal liberty and dignity. Or is it a crime against humanity? And other questions that can be raised, which we will try to answer in the context of this research.

ARE regional and global approaches to world order compatible or competitive ? Policy-makers and scholars pose this question with increasing frequency. Yet too often assessments of the relative capabilities of regional and general international organizations fail to distinguish the different demands such issues as threats to the peace or modernization create for widely divergent institutions. Enthusiasm for regionalism waxes and wanes with events. As Inis Claude observes, "The advocacy of regionalism can be, and often is, as doctrinaire and as heedless of concrete realities as the passion for all-encompassing organization."

REGIONAL COOPERATION AMONG SOUTH ASIAN NATIONS WAS INSTITUTIONALIZED WITH THE FORMATION OF SAARC ON DECEMBER 8, 1985. THE HEADS OF THE SEVEN SOUTH ASIAN COUNTRIES AGREED THAT SAARC WOULD PLAY AN IMPORTANT ROLE IN ACCELERATING ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT, PROMOTING NATIONAL AND COLLECTIVE SELF-RELIANCE, AND FURTHERING THE CAUSE OF PEACE, PROGRESS, AND STABILITY IN THE REGION AND THE WORLD. BUT SINCE THE BEGINNING SAARC HAS BEEN PLAGUED BY TENSIONS FROM WITHIN. POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, RELIGIOUS, AND ETHNIC FACTORS HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THESE TENSIONS.