Eyal Benvenisti, The International Law of Occupation
In: Journal of conflict and security law, Band 18, Heft 3, S. 525-524
ISSN: 1467-7954
2735172 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of conflict and security law, Band 18, Heft 3, S. 525-524
ISSN: 1467-7954
In: Journal of conflict and security law, Band 5, Heft 12, S. 157-176
ISSN: 1467-7954
In: Gregory S. Gordon, "Integrity in International Criminal Law: Post-Conviction Proceedings", in Morten Bergsmo and Viviane E. Dittrich (editors), Integrity in Internattional Justice, Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, Brussels, 2020
SSRN
This paper uses controversy mapping to study the history of Guatemala's General Electricity Law (GGEL, 1996). Particular attention is paid to the impact of the GGEL on social conflicts related to hydroelectricity. This article discusses how an array of actors –right–wing political parties and influencers, the 'El Niño' Phenomenon, the international wave of neoliberalism and a malfunctioning dam– coalesced to promote a law intended to modernize Guatemala's energy market and expand its electrical grid. Twenty years later, GGEL remains a relevant actor in the conflicts around new hydroelectricity projects. However, counter to the intentions of its promoters, this law has helped to fuel controversy. First, it indirectly imposes restrictions on negotiations among project stakeholders by forbidding the sale of energy to third parties; thus, it deprives actors of their strongest bargaining asset. Second, GGEL makes territorial interdependence invisible, shifting the costs and responsibilities from the government and companies to communities. Finally, while other studies have simply portrayed GGEL as a result of neoliberalism, an Actor–network theory (ANT) approach provides a broader picture of its origin and impact by taking into account the GGEL's role as a non–human actor.
BASE
In: Legal issues of economic integration: law journal of the Europa Instituut and the Amsterdam Center for International Law, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Band 28, Heft 3, S. 249-266
ISSN: 1566-6573, 1875-6433
In: Connecticut Journal of International Law, Band 26, Heft 2
SSRN
In: Revue internationale de la Croix-Rouge: débat humanitaire, droit, politiques, action = International Review of the Red Cross, Band 83, Heft 842, S. 439-460
ISSN: 1607-5889
Résumé
La récente décision d'etablir la Cour pénale internationale et
l'adoption de son Statut (Statut de Rome) a, une fois de plus, soulevé la
question de la responsabilité pénale, en droit international, du complice
dans un crime. L'auteur examine d'abord l'interprétation que le Tribunal de
Nuremberg a donnée de la notion de complice, pour passer ensuite à Vanalyse
de la jurisprudence des Tribunaux pénaux internationaux pour
l'ex-Yougoslavie et pour le Rwanda. Il constate que ces Tribunaux ont eu
l'occasion d'affiner leur jurisprudence par rapport aux complices, car,
jusqu'à ce jour, ils se sont davantage occupés d'executants que des vrais
instigateurs des crimes. La compétence du Tribunal pénal international en
matière de responsabilite penale des complices ne differe guère de celle
qu'on trouve dans le Statut de chacun des deux Tribunaux ad hoc. Selon
l'auteur, il n'est cependant pas exclu que la notion de complicité ne soit
élargie à l'avenir pour englober, par exemple, la responsabilité des
fournisseurs d'armes ou d'autres activités dans l'ombre des guerres
modernes. Une telle évolution de la pratique des Tribunaux pénaux
internationaux renforcerait la position du droit international
humanitaire.
In: S. Vöneky, Implementation and Enforcement of International Humanitarian Law, Draft: April 2, 2020 D. Fleck (ed): Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, Fourth Edition, Forthcoming
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
Working paper
In: The urban lawyer: the national journal on state and local government law, Band 34, Heft 1, S. 131
ISSN: 0042-0905
In: Polish Yearbook of International Law, Band 37, S. 125-141
SSRN
This text presents an interdisciplinary approach to definition of torture by a group of prominent scholars of behavioural sciences, international law, human rights, and public health. It represents a first ever attempt to compare behavioural science and international law perspectives on definitional issues and promote a sound theory- and evidence-based understanding of torture
In: Routledge advances in international relations and global politics, 77
In: International Journal, Band 17, Heft 1, S. 82
In: 37 STAN. ENVTL. L. J. 127 (2018)
SSRN
Working paper