Suchergebnisse

Das International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) ist ein länderübergreifendes, fortlaufendes Umfrageprogramm, das jährlich Erhebungen zu Themen durchführt, die für die Sozialwissenschaften wichtig sind. Das Programm begann 1984 mit vier Gründungsmitgliedern - Australien, Deutschland, Großbritannien und den Vereinigten Staaten - und ist inzwischen auf fast 50 Mitgliedsländer aus aller Welt angewachsen. Da die Umfragen auf Replikationen ausgelegt sind, können die Daten sowohl für länder- als auch für zeitübergreifende Vergleiche genutzt werden. Jedes ISSP-Modul konzentriert sich auf ein bestimmtes Thema, das in regelmäßigen Zeitabständen wiederholt wird. Details zur Durchführung der nationalen ISSP-Umfragen entnehmen Sie bitte der Dokumentation. Die vorliegende Studie konzentriert sich auf Fragen zu politischen Einstellungen und der Rolle der Regierung.

Das International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) ist ein länderübergreifendes, fortlaufendes Umfrageprogramm, das jährlich Erhebungen zu Themen durchführt, die für die Sozialwissenschaften wichtig sind. Das Programm begann 1984 mit vier Gründungsmitgliedern - Australien, Deutschland, Großbritannien und den Vereinigten Staaten - und ist inzwischen auf fast 50 Mitgliedsländer aus aller Welt angewachsen. Da die Umfragen auf Replikationen ausgelegt sind, können die Daten sowohl für länder- als auch für zeitübergreifende Vergleiche genutzt werden. Jedes ISSP-Modul konzentriert sich auf ein bestimmtes Thema, das in regelmäßigen Zeitabständen wiederholt wird. Details zur Durchführung der nationalen ISSP-Umfragen entnehmen Sie bitte der Dokumentation. Die vorliegende Studie konzentriert sich auf Fragen zu individueller Gesundheit und dem Gesundheitssystem.

Due to the growth in the number of international students attending universities in Texas and the need to provide appropriate counseling services to them, nine international students were interviewed about their experiences of transitioning from their home country to college in rural Texas. The authors employed the transcendental phenomenological approach to qualitative research (Moustakas, 1994) which allowed for the following seven emergent themes were identified that described the participants' experiences: American TV; Knowing Someone; Like a Movie; Everybody Saying Hi; Transportation is Inconvenient; I Miss Noodles; and Being Optimistic. The emergent themes provided the basis for implications and recommendations for counseling services with the international student populations. Implications and recommendations for counselors on college campuses include, but are not limited to: actively collaborating with international student services, participating in new international student orientation services, and developing preemptive approaches to assisting international student during their transitions The authors make recommendations for further qualitative research and focus groups inquiries should be conducted by college counselors to better inform outreach services, for campus counseling and career service center, directed at assisting international students during their numerous transitions (Lértora et al., 2017).

The issue of cooperation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia is characterized by two seemingly very different aspects namely the legal, and the diplomatic (or 'political'). It is often argued that the diplomatic aspect is justifiably subject to deviation from the traditional legal criteria in international relations, such as are the principles of legality, reciprocity, etc. The author argues here that any 'pragmatism' that infringes the principles of legality in international relations, and in the internal political system, short lived, and that in the mid-term it emerges as counter-productive. The author is of the opinion that the Tribunal has resorted to such pragmatist steps, and has consequently been turned into a lobby, whose goal has been to influence the internal political scene of Serbia. By such action, the Tribunal, and primarily its Chief Prosecutor, have stepped out of the domain of legitimate action of a criminal court, and the destructive consequences of such 'relativisation' of the standards of legitimacy are yet to become clear in the further development of international criminal courts.

Derzeit wird der Jugendstrafvollzug in Österreich stark kritisiert. Die Öffentlichkeit wird immer wieder mit Missständen in Strafvollzugsanstalten, die Jugendliche betreffen, durch die Medien konfrontiert. Aus diesem Grund werden in der vorliegenden Diplomarbeit die spezifischen völkerrechtlichen Bestimmungen der Straf- und Untersuchungshaft für Kinder und Jugendliche mit der österreichischen Rechtsordnung verglichen. Durch diesen Vergleich werden die Mängel der österreichischen Rechtslage, die bei der Umsetzung auftreten, aufgezeigt und es werden Empfehlungen, die zur Behebung dieser Mängel beitragen können, formuliert. Im Einzelnen werden die völkerrechtlichen Voraussetzungen an die Straf- und Untersuchungshaft, kinderspezifische Verfahrensgarantien sowie Aspekte der kinderspezifischen Behandlung während des Freiheitsentzuges untersucht. Bezüglich der behandelten Verfahrensgarantien werden das Recht auf umgehenden Zugang zu einem rechtskundigen oder anderen geeigneten Beistand und das Recht auf Haftprüfung mit der österreichischen Rechtsordnung verglichen. Die Aspekte der kinderspezifischen Behandlung, die in dieser Arbeit behandelt werden, beinhalten das Folterverbot, das Gebot zur Trennung von Kindern und Erwachsenen, das Recht auf Bildung und die Überprüfungs- und Beschwerdemechanismen während der Untersuchungs- und Strafhaft. ; Currently prisons dealing with juvenile offenders are criticised in Austria. The public has been repeatedly confronted by the media with abuse in these penal institutions. Therefore, this diploma thesis compares the international provisions of youth imprisonment and pre-trial detention with the Austrian domestic law. The comparison shows the lack of implementation in the Austrian legal system. Furthermore recommendations will be made to avoid these deficits in the implementation. In detail, the requirements of international law regarding youth imprisonment and pre-trial detention, procedural safeguards for juveniles deprived of their liberty and special aspects concerning the treatment of juveniles during imprisonment and pre-trial detention will be examined. Regarding the procedural safeguards addressed the right of access to legal or other appropriate assistance and the right to challenge the legality will be compared with the Austrian legal system. The aspects addressed in this thesis, concerning the treatment of juveniles during imprisonment and pre-trial detention, are the prohibition of torture, the order to separate children from adults, the right to education and the inspection and complaints procedures. ; von Anna Opriessnig ; Abweichender Titel laut Übersetzung der Verfasserin/des Verfassers ; Graz, Univ., Dipl.-Arb., 2014 ; (VLID)252103

How psychology explains why a leader is willing to use military force to protect or salvage reputationIn Who Fights for Reputation, Keren Yarhi-Milo provides an original framework, based on insights from psychology, to explain why some political leaders are more willing to use military force to defend their reputation than others. Rather than focusing on a leader's background, beliefs, bargaining skills, or biases, Yarhi-Milo draws a systematic link between a trait called self-monitoring and foreign policy behavior. She examines self-monitoring among national leaders and advisers and shows that while high self-monitors modify their behavior strategically to cultivate image-enhancing status, low self-monitors are less likely to change their behavior in response to reputation concerns.Exploring self-monitoring through case studies of foreign policy crises during the terms of U.S. presidents Carter, Reagan, and Clinton, Yarhi-Milo disproves the notion that hawks are always more likely than doves to fight for reputation. Instead, Yarhi-Milo demonstrates that a decision maker's propensity for impression management is directly associated with the use of force to restore a reputation for resolve on the international stage.Who Fights for Reputation offers a brand-new understanding of the pivotal influence that psychological factors have on political leadership, military engagement, and the protection of public prestige

Preliminary Material /Arthur W. Rovine -- Overview Of Investor-State Arbitration Articles /Gabrielle Kaufmann-Kohler -- New Generation Of Bilateral Investment Treaties: Consensus Or Divergence? /John Beechey -- Eclipse Of Expropriation? /W. Michael Reisman -- Interim Measures: An Arbitrators Provisional Views /L. Yves Fortier -- Treatment Of Non-Disputing State Party Views In Investor-State Arbitrations /Andrea J. Menaker -- Current Developments In The United States /Donald Francis Donovan -- England: A Look Back On A Year Of Authority And Hilarity /Sophie Nappert -- Recent Significant French Judicial Decisions Involving International Arbitration /Philippe Pinsolle -- Recent Austrian, German, And Swiss Judicial Decisions Involving International Arbitration /Hilmar Raeschke-Kessler -- Overcoming Obstacles To Consolidation Of International Arbitrations /Michael Marks Cohen -- Should No-Class Action Arbitration Clauses Be Enforced? /Frédéric Bachand -- Desirability Of International Class Arbitration /Dana H. Freyer -- Feasibility Of Class Arbitration /John Fellas -- Choice Of Law In International Intellectual Property Arbitrations: A Three-Dimensional Chess Game? /Thomas D. Halket -- International Arbitration Of Intellectual Property Validity /Joel E. Lutzker -- Using Information Technology Efficiently In International Arbitration /Erik Schäfer -- Electronic Discovery And Arbitration: A Shortcut Through E-Discovery /Irene C. Warshauer -- How Confidential Is Mediation Confidentiality? /John Michael Richardson -- Mediators Take Note: Are We A Cottage Industry? Are We A Profession?Who Will Decide? /Judith P. Meyer -- Using Mediation Techniques To Improve M&A Outcomes /Patricia Barclay -- European Directive On Commercial Mediation: What It Provides And What It Doesn'T /F. Peter Phillips -- Commercial Mediation In China: Challenge Of Shifting Paradigms /F. Peter Phillips -- Mediation Trends In Australia - Déjà Vu And Innovation /Ian Hanger -- Final Step: Issues In Enforcing The Mediation Settlement Agreement /Edna Sussman -- Index /Arthur W. Rovine.

. The article analyzes the development and active implementation of Pakistan's policy of internationalization of the Afghan issue since the outbreak of the armed conflict in Afghanistan in the late 1970s. The author proves that the Afghan conflict has always been one of the pivotal factors for Pakistan in building its relations with the international community. In order to receive significant amounts of financial and military assistance, Pakistan sought to position itself as a frontline state. Since the late 2000s Pakistan has instrumentalized the Afghan issue to diversify its international relations searching for partners from the neighboring regions as a counterweight to the USA. The author examines the features and effectiveness of Pakistan's participation in various multilateral forums concerning the Afghan issue to some extent. The article emphasizes the essential infrastructure projects that will connect South and Central Asia, as well as potentially have a positive impact on the Pakistani economy. The article especially focuses on the Afghan issue as a part of Pakistan's foreign policy strategy since the Taliban's coming to power in Afghanistan in 2021. In this regard, Pakistan's key strategic documents, statements by Pakistani officials, and international community's expectations from the Pakistani authorities are analyzed. Based on this, it is predicted that Pakistan has to harmonize its position with the global and regional powers for a number of reasons and does not appear to be the first to recognize the Taliban government of Afghanistan. The author comes to the conclusion that Pakistan's correct approach towards the Afghan issue will contribute to its rise, above all, in the regional subsystem of international relations as a constructive actor and boost its socio-economic development.

The traditionally emergence of differences among people, common and perhaps it was natural and it is not usually considered in relations between individuals does not seem far-fetched idea origination dispute. With the growing human population and the natural growth of business and trade transactions between them and the complexity of certain fields of these transactions disputes arising from them, more and more widespread and sometimes even has been specialized. It went to the point in one of the last two centuries, several laws passed by the government to resolve the current dispute and with forming the courts for a variety of dispute resolution between individuals, many branches of the courtsdedicated to legal and commercial affairs and handle their disputes.All countries dispute arises between individuals were appointed to the courts; although this is associated with the severity and weaknesses in different countries and legal systems. Some with creates parallel institutions for the courts try to reduce congestion in the courts claimsand others by creating a concentration of executive power in the courts were concerned their main effort in resolving disputes before the court. Except for the courts in recent centuries in most societies with little differences in the shape and nature of the investigation into the allegations were established, in the last century, another institution for dispute between individualswas createdin many countries and within their judicial system that was called judgment. This reference formed in subsets of international organizations was created to resolve international disputes that generally was concerned in the international trade disputes between natural or legal persons. This is in a series of international law, in the form of legislation and judicial procedures that in this study we analyzed it.