Suchergebnisse

In the article the main methodological approaches to the problem of interaction of institutes of the state and civil society in the context of ensuring national security of Russia are analyzed. Two main alternative concepts (liberal and etatist) to which the Russian researchers adhere are allocated. Supporters of liberal approach suppose that domination of the interests of civil society and ensuring equal cooperation with government institutions at the solution of problems of ensuring national security is necessary. Adherents of the etatist concept defend an unconditional priority of government bodies in this sphere. The authors provide the conceptual analysis of estimates by domestic researchers of the main activities of associations of the citizens connected with the counteraction to threats of national security. In the article positive impact of institutes of civil society on political and social and economic processes in Russia is noted, their assistance in development of the state institutes of the state and the potential of constructive interaction with federal and regional authorities on ensuring national security is estimated. The detailed analysis of the politological concept according to which more active participation of public organizations and socially responsible citizens in ensuring national security is necessary, is carried out. Their influence on development of a security system has to become more and more considerable because of social and economic problems which are objectively demanding participation of civil society in their decision-making. It is connected also with the need of modernization breakthrough, not possible without civil initiatives. In the article the conclusion that the Russian researchers attach great value to interaction of institutes of the state and civil society in ensuring national security of the Russian Federation is drawn, conceptually proving the need of their joint activity for this direction, and noting that this potential is still not fully realized.

First of all, the article presents the relevance and necessity of the adoption of the new Labor Code and highlights the general problems of current labor legislation, for example, the inconsistency of the legislation with the existing relations, the lack of a list of all subjects in a single codified act, the obsolescence of approaches, and so on. At the same time, it should be emphasized that the current labor code is constantly being amended, which makes it overloaded. The article emphasizes and substantiates the importance of the social orientation of labor legislation. This need lies primarily in the fact that the participants in the employment relationship are not actually rhymes. The employer occupies a more favorable and privileged position in relation to the employee, and therefore may abuse his power and administrative resources. That is why it is important that the rules contained in the Labor Code are focused on the legal equality of the parties. These are guarantees for employees that limit the arbitrariness of the employer, as well as mutual rights and obligations. Arguments that were given indicate the need to study any bill for social orientation. There are also the main international acts that confirm the need for social coherence of labor legislation. The last three bills, which are proposed as a replacement for the current Labor Code, were also considered. These bills are analyzed for social orientation and the availability and security of employees' guarantees to employers. The main shortcomings in each bill were also identified. This allowed us to conclude that currently the legislator has not taken into account such an important aspect of the formation of labor legislation as social orientation. During the study of the bills, a number of shortcomings were found, which are hidden in the essence of the norms. The legislator uses different approaches from those used and are currently used. But instead of European standards and guarantees, we have a decrease in social orientation, which is ...

The article is devoted to the European Union's single market of labor and capital. A critical approach is being set out with respect to the EU experience in this area (taking into account COVID 19) and the possibilities of its use today in the economy of the Russian Federation and the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). Certain Russian authors expected unstable and insufficiently favorable development of the economic and political situation abroad for many years, as well as the negative impact of this on the Russian economy in a number of works published by them 5–10 years ago. In particular, it is pointed out that the problems associated with free labor migration will aggravate in the face of deep economic сrisis and adverse economic conditions. It is expected that such conditions will prevail in the European and Eurasian area in the near future. The advantages and the disadvantages of free migration of labor and capital are reviewed. In EAEU the freedom of mobility of the factors of production increased, however now the question is raised about the impact of СOVID 19 and economic crisis on the migration of factors of production (especially labor) as well as about the socio-economic reasons for the large-scale spread of coronavirus. The importance of studying these issues is emphasized. In today's circumstances the massive imports of labor in Russia is risky. Some alternative approaches are considered. The article touches upon many hot topics of world development, including de-globalization, the growth of centrifugal forces in the EU, Brexit.