Suchergebnisse

Each no. also has a distinctive title. ; Title varies. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Edited by the Faculty of Political Science of Columbia University.

Editors: 1906-16, W.W. Willoughby and others; 1917-25, J.A. Fairlie and others; 1926- F.A. Ogg and others. ; Vols. 6-8 accompanied by supplements: Proceedings of the association at its 8th-10th annual meetings, 1911-Dec. 30, 1913/Jan. 1, 1914. Vol. 24, no. 1, Feb. 1930, accompanied by suppl.: Report of the Committee on Policy of the Association. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Vols. 1-10, 1906-16 (Suppl. to v. 11, no. 3). 1 v. (Includes index to the association's Proceedings, 1904-14); Vols. 1-20, 1906-26. 1 v. ; "Book review" section continued in 2003 as part of: Perspectives on politics. ; "News and notes" section continued in 1968 as part of: PS.

Vol. 1-33 lack whole numbering but constitute no. 1-88; no. 89-273 also called v. 34-124. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Edited by the Faculty of Political Science, Columbia University.

Discusses the lasting influence on later US presidential scholars of Richard E. Neustadt's "Presidential power", first published in 1960, in which he analyzed presidential leadership and policy-making, and the need for an executive partnership with Congress, with Franklin Delano Roosevelt as his ideal, and subsequent challenges to Neustadt's theses.

POWER APPROACH IN POLITICAL SCIENCE IS ANALYZED BY FIRST CONTRASTING TRADITIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL DEFINITIONS OF POWER. SECONDLY, FIVE BEHAVIORAL DEFINITIONS OF POWER BY SUCH SCHOLARS AS CARTWRIGHT, DAHL, LASSWELL AND KAPLAN, MARCH, AND SIMON ARE EXAMINED TO ILLUSTRATE THE DIVERSITY OF DEFINITIONS OF POWER IN THE DISCIPLINE OF POLITICAL SCIENCE.

Mode of access: Internet. ; Handbooks for 1891, 1897-98, 1901 issued as supplements to the Society's Annals.

AbstractThis address examines the relationship of political science and democratic governance by considering changes in both the political world and the discipline in Canada since the 1960s. It argues that the developing dynamics in political life, as significant as they have been, have not fundamentally altered the essential features of democratic governance in Canada. It suggests that a number of factors account for the diminished capacity of the discipline, as a collective scholarly and teaching enterprise, to contribute to democratic political life. On the one hand is the relative paucity of institutional mechanisms in Canada to link political science to democratic governance; on the other is the discipline's own fragmentation that lessens its focus on questions central to democratic governance.

Analysis of the pre-1989 situation; Redefinition of the discipline since 1990; Core theoretical and methodological orientations; Thematic orientation and funding; Public space and academic debates; Views on further development.