Suchergebnisse

This paper examines state policies that extend or deny in-state tuition to children of undocumented immigrants in the United States. Using the Current Population Survey (1997–2010), we assess changes in college enrollment among Mexican-born non-citizens — a proxy for the undocumented population. In contrast to previous analyses, we find that policies extending in-state tuition to undocumented youth do not directly affect rates of college enrollment. However, we find that Mexican-born non-citizen youth residing in states that deny in-state tuition have a 12.1 percentage point lower probability of being enrolled in college than their peers living in states with no such policies.

본 연구는 연방체제와 연방사회 간 합치(congruence) 여부에 초점을 맞춰 연방주의가 교육복지에서 어떻게 구현되었는지 또는 구현되는데 실패했는지 미국 사례에 조명하고자 한다. 구체적으로 공식적 제도에 근거한 연방국가와 민족-언어에 근거한 다양성이 표출된 사회구조를 가리키는 연방사회가 불합치하면 교육복지에서 어떤 연방주의로구현되는지 시대별로 검토하고자 한다. 이에 본 논문은 우선 연방주의를 건국이념으로채택한 미국이 다른 연방국가와 대조적으로 헌법상 교육 권한의 소재지를 주정부에게명기함에도 불구하고 교육복지에서 연방정부가 소규모이나 점진적으로 권한영역을 확대하는 근거를 살펴보고자 한다. 특히 미국의 교육 및 교육복지는 민족-언어의 동질성이 크지 않음에도 불구하고 대칭적 연방주의로 발전했고, 그 부산물로 헌법에도 명시되지 않은 교육 권한이 제한적이기는 하나 점차 연방정부로 이전하는 양상을 보인다. 따라서 본 논문은 연방주의를 작동시키는 주요 동력으로서 사회적 요인, 보다 정확하게민족-언어적 이질성에 일차적으로 초점을 맞춰 교육 연방주의의 정치 사회학을 연대기적으로 재조명하고자 한다. 그리고 미국 연방주의를 교육복지에 초점을 맞춰 연방제의운용 단면을 살펴보고자 한다. ; In this paper, I propose to explore the political sociological aspect of federalism in education welfare in America. Specifically, I intend to illuminate the misfit between federal system and federal society by providing the historiography of education welfare in U. S. In doing so, I plan to put emphasis on the role of societal factors, or more precisely, the ethno-linguistic patterns, in influencing the workings of the American federal system. Unlike other federal states, U.S. eventually evolved into a symmetrical federalism in education welfare where the federal demarcations were drawn independently of the underlying social structure despite her lack of ethno-linguistic homogeneity. In this paper, I first contrast across 7 federal states and strive to explicate how American federalism stands apart from her counterparts. Then, I look into how the meager federal department of education occasionally but gradually managed to tread on states' right in providing education and education welfare. I conclude by putting the American education welfare in perspective. ; OAIID:oai:osos.snu.ac.kr:snu2013-01/102/0000040203/2 ; SEQ:2 ; PERF_CD:SNU2013-01 ; EVAL_ITEM_CD:102 ; USER_ID:0000040203 ; ADJUST_YN:Y ; EMP_ID:A076716 ; DEPT_CD:216 ; FILENAME:2013세계지역연구논총 31집3호_이옥연.pdf ; DEPT_NM:정치외교학부 ; SCOPUS_YN:N ; CONFIRM:Y

PurposeThis study aims to analyse the contribution of the expansion and diversification of higher education to Chile's increase in wage inequality from 1992 to 2000 and its subsequent decrease from 2000 to 2013.Design/methodology/approachThe wage equation for each year is estimated using data from the national household survey, Encuesta de Caracterización Socioeconómica Nacional (CASEN). Using the method proposed by Firpo et al. (2009), the evolution of wage changes is decomposed into composition and wage structure effects of each explanatory variable at different points of the wage distribution.FindingsThe results show that the positive composition effect of higher education, derived from the increasing share of both workers with university degrees and those with vocational degrees, is substantially larger at the upper quantiles and exceeds the negative wage structure effect, thereby contributing to increasing wage inequality from 1992 to 2000. By contrast, the negative wage structure effect of higher education, primarily derived from the decreasing return to university degrees, is substantially larger at the upper quantiles and exceeds the positive composition effect, thereby contributing to decreasing wage inequality from 2000 to 2013.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the literature by showing that the expansion of higher education increased inequality in the 1990s and decreased it in the 2000s while the increasing supply of workers with vocational degrees decreased wage premiums for university degrees in the latter period.

The growth of market forces and the rhetoric of 'choice' in education ignores economic and cultural differences between parents, especially the implications for lone mothers on low incomes, by assuming everyone has equal access to resources. Social, economic and education policies com bine to constrain and limit the involvement and 'choice' lone mothers have in their children's education. This article explores some of the struc tural and moral constraints placed upon lone mothers on low incomes in relation to their children's schooling, while acknowledging that lone mothers work within these constraints to create opportunities for their children in education.