The Swiss Welfare State at a Turuing Point?: Ideology, Political Process, and Resources
In: Governance: an international journal of policy and administration, Band 1, Heft 3, S. 312-330
ISSN: 1468-0491
1514319 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Governance: an international journal of policy and administration, Band 1, Heft 3, S. 312-330
ISSN: 1468-0491
In: International organization, Band 42, Heft 1, S. 15-32
ISSN: 1531-5088
Basic analytic premises are an issue in contemporary debates about the U.S. foreign economic policy process. In dispute are the power structures alleged to govern the formation of American trade and international monetary policy. Thus, the literature supports both of these assumptions: the distribution of power is skewed towards private actors in the issue-area generally; the distribution of power varies according to issue-area. Within the camp of issue-specific power structures, as I shall discuss in more detail, support can be found for almost any assumption about the distribution of power prevailing, in the language of current debate, between "state and society."
In: Journal of policy modeling: JPMOD ; a social science forum of world issues, Band 1, Heft 2, S. 235-249
ISSN: 0161-8938
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/uc1.31158008095225
Chapter one of the author's book entitled Political ideals, first published in 1917. ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
In: Political geography: an interdisciplinary journal for all students of political studies with an interest in the geographical and spatial aspects, Band 22, Heft 6, S. 607-610
ISSN: 0962-6298
SSRN
In: European journal of politics and gender, Band 1, Heft 1-2, S. 55-74
ISSN: 2515-1096
This article gives an overview of the field of LGBT politics in European political science. It does not aim to offer an exhaustive review of the literature, but rather to highlight the major trends and to reflect critically on the endeavours of the last 25 years. After a history of the development of this field of research and a mapping of existing scholarship, this piece sheds light on new areas of inquiry (Europe, international relations, nationalism, trans* politics and oppositions) and discusses some of the key challenges for the future, with a focus on the conditions of knowledge production.
In: PS: political science & politics, Band 49, Heft 1, S. 128-131
ISSN: 1537-5935
ABSTRACTUndergraduate research (UGR) is a "high-impact practice" that has been consistently shown to effectively promote desirable student-learning outcomes (SLOs) including critical thinking, logic, written and oral communication, problem solving, and interpretation of evidence, especially among minority and disadvantaged students. Mentoring quality UGR experiences in regular upper-level political science courses, however, is a difficult and time-consuming activity. This article describes an attempt to provide an intensive, semester-long, and group-based UGR experience in an upper-level American politics course. It discusses how this experience was designed to deliberately foster specific institutional UGR SLOs and summarizes student perceptions of the overall effectiveness of the experience.
In: The China quarterly: an international journal for the study of China, Heft 184, S. 875-893
ISSN: 0305-7410, 0009-4439
World Affairs Online
In: American political science review, Band 100, Heft 4, S. 670
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: Political studies, Band 44, Heft 4, S. 765
ISSN: 0032-3217
In: Political studies: the journal of the Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom, Band 18, Heft 1, S. 43-106
ISSN: 1467-9248
In: American political science review, Band 96, Heft 1, S. 1-14
ISSN: 1537-5943
The motor of international politics has been war among the leading states. The most developed states in the international system—the United States, Western Europe, and Japan—form what Karl Deutsch called a security community, which is a group of countries among which war is unthinkable. These states are the most powerful ones in the world and, so, are traditional rivals. Thus the change is striking and consequential. Constructivists explain this in terms of changed ideas and identities; liberals point to democracy and economic interest; realists stress the role of nuclear weapons and American hegemony. My own explanation combines the high cost of war, the gains from peace, and the values that are prevalent within the security community. Whatever the cause, the existence of the community will bring with it major changes in international politics and calls into question many traditional theories of war.
In: Politics and the life sciences: PLS ; a journal of political behavior, ethics, and policy, Band 4, Heft 1, S. 18-19
ISSN: 1471-5457