Living dangerously: Oplosan, gambling and competition as everyday risk-taking in Java and East Kalimantan Indonesia
In: Disaster prevention and management: an international journal, Band 24, Heft 4, S. 523-538
ISSN: 1758-6100
2115495 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Disaster prevention and management: an international journal, Band 24, Heft 4, S. 523-538
ISSN: 1758-6100
In: Disaster prevention and management: an international journal, Band 24, Heft 4, S. 506-522
ISSN: 1758-6100
In: Disaster prevention and management: an international journal, Band 24, Heft 4, S. 430-447
ISSN: 1758-6100
In: Disaster prevention and management: an international journal, Band 24, Heft 4, S. 448-467
ISSN: 1758-6100
In: International journal of cultural property, Band 22, Heft 2-3, S. 301-314
ISSN: 1465-7317
Abstract:The return of works of art by museums to nations of origin has generated considerable scholarly response, yet there has been little engagement with the potential role museums could have as responsible stewards for works of art that are at risk. One important example can be seen in the actions of the Menil Foundation. The Menil, with the permission of the Church of Cyprus, conserved a series of frescoes and created a purpose-built gallery on the Menil campus in Houston to safely house them. It was a novel solution to the problems caused by the situation in Cyprus. Acquiring and saving these thirteenth century frescoes gives an important template for the rescue and conservation of works of art that are at risk, but also exposes similarly-situated actors to the moral dilemma of purchasing looted art with the consent of the original owner.
In: International journal of cultural property, Band 22, Heft 2-3, S. 163-176
ISSN: 1465-7317
Abstract:Cultural property claims are numerous and of very different nature. Some relate to recent trafficking of cultural property;1some are based on ancient legal grounds which are contested today;2others relate to past wars and colonial times;3others, still, relate to mass spoliations in times of conflict.4In general, though, the original owner seeks to recover what was taken from him, or at least to obtain some form of compensation.5The present owner or possessor is as a matter of principle interested in keeping his possession.6These conflicting positions are often seen as irreconcilable and, indeed, litigation in a traditional manner will bring to the typical "either/or" solution: either I am the owner, or you are. There is no in-between solution.
In: International environmental agreements: politics, law and economics, Band 16, Heft 5, S. 721-738
ISSN: 1573-1553
In: International journal of cultural property, Band 22, Heft 2-3, S. 379-399
ISSN: 1465-7317
Abstract:This article analyzes the dichotomy between the practices of the art market and of court judges when it comes to the authentication of works of art. While judges very much rely on experts acting in the art market, they may not necessarily pursue the same examination methods and conclusions, which can have serious repercussions on the art object and for its owner. The dichotomy unavoidably leads to the questions of what the correct assessment is and whether court judges should be conducting such examinations.Taking account of the difficulties judges and legislators face in attempting to interfere with established art market practices, it is suggested that courts are not an adequate forum to resolve authenticity disputes. Instead, scholars and art market actors should adopt improved authentication standards and, in the event of a dispute, refer to alternative means of dispute resolution.
In: International journal of cultural property, Band 22, Heft 2-3, S. 259-278
ISSN: 1465-7317
Abstract:Private ownership and cultural heritage protection are two interests in continuing tension. The traditional conception of property right is based on an absolute individual right to the peaceful enjoyment of possessions. However, interference in this right may restrict its exercise and impose charges on the owner, such as classification measures and conservation easements. This paper formulates a hypothesis about an increased protection of cultural heritage along with that of private ownership.Against the background of a complex constitutional allocation of cultural powers, Belgian law provides a pertinent illustration of this development. At the one hand, Belgian governments have been adopting more extensive legislation protecting cultural heritage. On the other hand, Belgian courts, traditionally reluctant to recognize any compensation right when the protective measure only restricts the ownership, gradually appear to undertake a more thorough analysis of the fair balance between the conflicting interests, notably in favor of the owner.The authors gauge the merits of a new model of cultural heritage protection.
In: International journal of cultural property, Band 22, Heft 2-3, S. 357-378
ISSN: 1465-7317
Abstract:This article reviews the shift in cultural property litigation in the United States over the past twenty-five years from private replevin actions, in which the original owner sues the current possessor and must bear the costs as well as overcome procedural and logistical obstacles, in particular the statutes of limitation, to civil forfeiture actions instituted by the U.S. government to obtain restitution. The article then analyzes recent cases that arguably illustrate over-enforcement of the law through the use of unclear legal standards in civil forfeiture. It then turns to shortcomings in the effectiveness of U.S. law, in particular the difficulty in imposing emergency import restrictions in the cases of Iraq and Syria, and an over-emphasis on the use of civil forfeiture, which has largely replaced criminal prosecutions in the cultural property arena—but without which there is no true deterrent to trafficking in illegal cultural objects.
In: International journal of cultural property, Band 22, Heft 2-3, S. 419-435
ISSN: 1465-7317
Abstract:Since the first lawsuit against the Knoedler Gallery was filed for selling forgeries, the art world has been abuzz with stories of high-end fakes. However, forgeries are not a new phenomenon. The law of supply and demand dictates that there will be no end to the rising value of artworks done by the hands of "masters." And with soaring market prices, art forgery will proliferate as forgers find incentive in skyrocketing sales. At the heart of forgery disputes is the determination of authenticity. Who makes these determinations? How does the market and legal world handle a battle of experts? Moreover, what remedies are available to disappointed buyers? The best method of protection is to complete due diligence; however, the process is often complex and expensive. Even after completing due diligence, it is possible for buyers to be left with sophisticated fakes. What legal remedies are available to buyers?
In: International journal of cultural property, Band 22, Heft 2-3, S. b1-b2
ISSN: 1465-7317
In: International journal of cultural property, Band 22, Heft 2-3, S. 177-204
ISSN: 1465-7317
Abstract:In the UK, there is a public perception that, if a cultural object is given to a museum, it will remain in its collections forever. But does UK law reflect this? This article analyses UK law and discusses whether a commercial approach is not always well suited to serve the needs of the museum sector and whether there should be more thought given to the public nature of museums. It calls for law reform in order to ensure that UK law and ethical guidance relating to deaccessioning and disposals from collections is sufficient to maintain public trust, so that people continue to visit museums and to offer objects for their collections.
In: International journal of cultural property, Band 22, Heft 2-3, S. f1-f6
ISSN: 1465-7317
In: International journal of cultural property, Band 22, Heft 2-3, S. 401-417
ISSN: 1465-7317
Abstract:This article examines the duties of diligence of lawyers when handling art-related matters. Due diligence is paramount to any activity in the art market and a key element in ascertaining ownership, authenticity or provenance. In particular, it is a benchmark to help determine the existence of possible criminal activities, including money laundering, terrorism financing or document forgery, to which the art market is regularly exposed. The question arises as to the obligations incumbent to art lawyers who are privileged witnesses of the functioning of the art market. Such obligations include in particular the duty to enquire on the particularities of a transaction, the duty to terminate a mandate or the duty to report any suspicious transaction under threat of civil or criminal sanctions. A survey has shown that art law specialists would welcome more guidance in the form of tailored regulations or professional guidelines.