The Poetic Thing (On Poetry and Deconstruction)
In: The Oxford literary review: OLR ; critical analyses of literary, philosophical political and psychoanalytic theory, Band 33, Heft 2, S. 231-243
ISSN: 1757-1634
Deconstruction has sometimes been championed as if it was a kind of poetic (as opposed to say analytic) writing. The identification has encouraged some to relegate deconstruction to the shadows or sidelines, the sideshows, of serious philosophy. Both tendencies are foolish. There nonetheless remains the question of the relation between two enigmatic discourses: poetry and deconstruction; some deep complicity is surely implied. Reading in the texts of philosophy and poetry the adventure and performance of the names themselves, philosophy, poetry and deconstruction, it is possible to outline the consistency of a logic, according to which: as poetry must have its thing, so too must deconstruction; and philosophy would be deconstruction's poetic thing. The common ground (of poetry and deconstruction) would be the photograph (in ancient and modern senses) recording the loss of what disappears into its appearance. After deconstruction philosophy can therefore only be accomplished otherwise, not as poetry, but as a poetic thing.