TO BE OR NOT TO BE AND WHY HUMANITY HAS A PROSPECT BEING
This article attempts to present objections to the quite common position that humanity has no future, and it gives arguments why it is still there. Despite the fact that, indeed, humanity lives in a state of emergency, so-called second axial time in which the anthropological revolution is happening. Will human evolution continue? Is there the prospect of mankind? And this question is not private and scientific, but supposing a revolution in the basic existence, in the sense of human existence of mankind and every ethnic group. Some of the researchers are looking for an answer; others simply sounding the alarm; third, and there are a lot of them today, give the negative answer to this question. The logic of the last opinions is that humanity violates the principle of natural selection; wittingly or unwittingly the cultural evolution protected the human of biological congestion, which previously eliminated the heavy, weak and slow-moving individuals; physically imperfect people, who a hundred years ago would have died in childhood, now survive and produce offspring, passing their genetic defects to the next generations. The massive migration process contributes to the suspension of evolution. Now, actually none of the groups of the Earth population lives in closed systems, in isolation for rather long time required for its conversion into a new species. Thus, culture and humanism transform from the consequence into the negative cause. Another part of the researchers, including the author of this article, give a positive answer to this question. Firstly, because the cultural evolution is completed by coevolution. It also produces the natural selection but for cultural reasons. It produces more intelligent, educated, culturally strong, honest and efficient individuals. Because before distributing, selling, stealing away, or robbing something, etc., it must be created, produced, discovered, or constructed. Secondly, migration, inevitably turning to globalization, contributes to the continuing of evolution, transforming the world into an open system, in contrast to the previous isolation it encourages and makes human beings live by the measure of the best groups and individuals, despite of all sorts of simulacra, etc. Globalization is not only a decoration, or cover for someone's hidden intentions, and, according to A.A. Zinoviev, the emerging global super society as another structure of humanity. Third, this point of view is based on a different understanding of the essence of man on the neo-classical one. According to it, in its essence, everyone is not an animal (even if it is so called rational, political, social, intellectual, making tools animal and so on), but a supernatural, overfunctional and originally cultural individual; man is the subject and object of culture, each in his own way and the level of his development. Fourth, there is another argument which is explicated in the analysis of the problem of anthropogenesis. It means that human being is eternal in the universe: in a scale of infinity of the universe (and not in the relative Earth limb) human being has no origin, because it was, it is and it always will be. The main reason is the current synergetic evidence of infinity of the universe, the universe as an open system.