Suchergebnisse

Copyright, for a long time has not been regulated or protected at the desired level. The right on intellectual property, as a right of a particular kind and as the right of non-material property, is of particular importance for the contemporary reality.The copyright, in its content, enjoys the rights of personal and property nature. The natural rights, for a long time, have been characterized as very personal rights that relate to the creator of the work itself. This has probably been because in the early times it was impossible the multiplication of the author's work because the handwriting of the work has been a rare process and difficult. Later, with the invention of the typing machine, it was noticed that the works can be easily multiplied, as such came the need to protect the authors and their rights by providing to the authors reward in the case when their work is violated.Property rights are inseparable rights for the authors, which often serve also as stimulus for the creation of new works, but also provide reward for the effort given on the creation of the work.Law on Copyright of theRepublicofKosovois in accordance with the rules of the European Union, but the judicial practice is not in accordance with the Law. This happens because in the reality, the property rights and the moral rights are subject to violations, and as a result is violated even one of the primary and contemporary goals: the law should serve as an incentive for the authors to write and on the other side to satisfy the public with the scientific works.As such, the research objective of this paper is to present the property rights of copyright, the basics of the transfer of these rights, studied also at the comparative aspect.

Possible author: Pascoe Grenfell. - Cf. copy from the Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration Library, in Pre-1956 NUC. ; Signed: A.B. ; Microfiche (neg.) 1 sheet. 11 x 15 cm. (NYPL FSN 30,970). ; Mode of access: Internet.

Ogólnopolska Konferencja Naukowa "W kierunku kształtowania się nowego publicznego transportu zbiorowego", Poznań, 22 listopada 2019 r.

Die Arbeit unterzieht die im Nachgang an das Caroline-Urteil des EGMR aus dem Jahre 2004 geänderte Rechtsprechung des BGH zur Bewertung der Zeitgeschichtlichkeit von Bildnissen i.S.v. § 23 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 KUG einer detaillierten Kritik. Die Untersuchung zeigt, dass die Rechtsprechung des VI. Zivilsenats zum sog. abgestuften Schutzkonzept Ergebnisse erzielt, die weder den betroffenen Interessen gerecht werden, noch die notwendige Rechtssicherheit liefern. Es ergehen widersprüchliche Entscheidungen, die zudem in zunehmendem Maße nicht mehr nachvollziehbar begründet werden. Der Persönlichkeitsschutz wird dadurch in grundrechtlich nicht zu rechtfertigender Weise verkürzt. Überdies wird die Frage beantwortet, wie die Zeitgeschichtlichkeit von Bildnissen richtigerweise zu beurteilen ist. Besondere Behandlung erfährt die normative Bestimmung des legitimen Informationsinteresses, welches für die Grenzziehung zwischen Persönlichkeitsrecht und Veröffentlichungsfreiheit als maßgeblich angesehen wird. / »The German Federal Court of Justice and the So-Called Stepped Protection Concept Within the Framework of Sec. 22 and 23 par. 1 no. 1 KUG« -- This paper deals with the case law of the German Federal Court of Justice on the right to one's own image. It shows that the results of the case law are not in line with the interests at stake and the protection of personality is not sufficiently considered. The work answers the question of when contemporary historical events exist that allow the publication of images without the consent of the person depicted within the framework of the relevant standards of German law.

(Bibliography) Includes bibliographical references and index. ; (Funding) Funded through the Humanities Open Book, which is jointly sponsored by the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. ; (Statement of Responsibility) [by] Cornelis Ch. Goslinga.

In 1940 the U.S. Army Signal Intelligence Service broke the Japanese diplomatic code. In 1975 Oshima Hiroshi, Japan's ambassador to Berlin during World War II, died, never knowing that the hundreds of messages he transmitted to Tokyo had been fully decoded by the Americans and whisked off to Washington, providing a major source of information for the Allies on Nazi activities. Resurrecting Oshima's decoded communications, which had remained classified for several decades, Carl Boyd provides a unique look at the Nazis from the perspective of a close foreign observer and ally. He uses Oshima's own words to reveal the thought and strategies of Adolf Hitler and other high-ranking Nazis, with whom Oshima associated. In addition to providing illuminating insight into Nazi activities and attitudes--military buildup in North Africa, the unwillingness to accept a separate peace with the Soviets--Boyd illustrates the functions of MAGIC. He demonstrates how that intelligence, gathered by teams of American cryptographers, influenced Allied strategy and helped bring about the downfall of Hitler and his Japanese confidant. [From the publisher] ; https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/history_books/1052/thumbnail.jpg