Suchergebnisse

Post-conflict peacebuilding is a multidimensional, highly complex and multifaceted undertaking that requires significant resources (financial, technical, human, etc.). With the proliferation of actors in this field, it's in this context that peacebuilding interventions by international financial institutions in countries emerging from armed conflict are taking place. It's therefore not surprising to see that international financial institutions linking are peace and development issues. Because it should be noted that "action in favour of development produces its best results only in times of peace." While the competence of international financial institutions in the economic field is a truism, their competence in peacebuilding is not reflected and deserves more appeal and questioning. Peacebuilding is therefore not expressly included in the constitutive documents of the international financial institutions. This is why it's relevant to focus on the legality of peacebuilding interventions by international financial institutions whose intervention in fragile countries, including post-conflict countries, is very often criticized and can generate feelings of mistrust and enthusiasm. The international financial institutions in question include the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and the Regional Development Banks. The main objective of the United Nations is the maintenance of international peace and security. Today, this objective has evolved to include peacebuilding after maintaining it. Thus, since the international financial institutions are specialized agencies of the United Nations, their peacebuilding interventions are, therefore, lawful because they are part of the United Nations system.

Chapter 1. Discourses and Sources of International Law -- Chapter 2. Sovereignty and Responsibility -- Chapter 3. Historical Ambiguity and Territoriality -- Chapter 4. Normativity and Maritime Competitivity -- Chapter 5. Plights and Human Rights -- Chapter 6. Trade Liberalization and Inhibition -- Chapter 7. Regionalism and Eclecticism.

Foreign drug kingpins, rogue dictators; state-sponsored terrorists. These "bad guys" are the leading threats to America's national security, replacing the old Soviet Union and a China that is no longer "Red." Conceptually, fighting the new bad guys is not as easy as fighting the old threats: "nuking" the Soviet Union or China always remained an option, however foolish. Overwhelming military force, however, was not designed to handle unconventional threats posed by drug dealers and terrorists and may be an inappropriate method of containing or crushing some dictators. Increasingly, the United States is turning to a new unilateral weapon - international trade measures - regardless of opposition from its allies and trading partners.

The Finnish Yearbook publishes in-depth articles and shorter notes, commentaries on current developments, book reviews and relevant overviews of Finland's state practice. While firmly grounded in traditional legal scholarship, it is open for new approaches to international law and for work of an interdisciplinary nature