Suchergebnisse

Preliminary Material /Russell Miller and Rebecca Bratspies -- Foreword: Progress in International Law? /José E. Alvarez -- Progress in International Law – an Explanation of the Project /Russell a. Miller and Rebecca M. Bratspies -- Evidence and Promise of Progress: Increased Interdependence, Rights and Responsibilities, Arenas of Interaction, and the Need for More Cooperative Uses of Armed Force /Jordan J. Paust -- Making Progress in International Institutions and Law /Barry E. Carter -- The Turning Aside. On International Law and Its History /Alexandra Kemmerer -- The Necessity of International Law against the A-normativity of Neo-Conservative Thought /Sergio Dellavalle -- Yom Kippur in Hell: the Empty Life of International Law /Ed Morgan -- Progress in International Organization: a Constitutionalist Reading /Christian Walter -- On the Borders of Justice: an Examination and Possible Solution to the Doctrine of Uti Possidetis /Daniel Luker -- The Evolving Role of Treaties in International Law /Karin Oellers-Frahm -- Customary International Law in the 21St Century /Andrew T. Guzman and Timothy L. Meyer -- Treaties as Domestic Law in the United States /Alex Glashausser -- The "Unsatisfactory Condition" of Customary International Law in the United States /Julian G. Ku -- In Quite a State: the Trials and Tribulations of an Old Concept in New Times /Florian Hoff Mann -- Between Incapacity and Indispensability: Th E United Nations and International Order in the 21St Century /Andreas Paulus -- Coordination of International Organizations — Intellectual Property Law as an Example: Can There Be Safety in Numbers? /Karen Kaiser -- Individual Progress in International Law: Considering Amnesty /Leila Nadya Sadat -- The Challenges of Evaluating NGO "Success" in Cross-Border Rights Initiatives: the Examples of the International Campaign to Ban Landmines and the Autotrim/Customtrim Initiative under the NAFTA Labor Side Agreement /Monica Schurtman -- Paradoxes of Personality: Transnational Corporations, Non-Governmental Organizations and Human Rights in International Law /Russell A. Miller -- Transnational Networks and the International Public Order /Jenia Iontcheva Turner -- Progress in International Adjudication: Revisiting Hudson's Assessment of the Future of International Courts /Cesare P R. Romano -- The "Precedential Judge Hudson"? Rivers, Oceans, Equity, and International Tribunals /Betsy Baker -- The Role of Transnational Judicial Dialogue in Shaping Transnational Speech: International Jurisdictional Conflicts in Hate Speech and Defamation Law /Melissa a. Waters -- Expanding Influence: Regional Human Rights Courts and Death Penalty Abolition /Kelly Parker -- Triumph of Progress: the Embrace of International Commercial Arbitration /Mary a. Bedikian -- International Security and the Use of Force /Abraham D. Sofaer -- Reforming the Security Council to Achieve Collective Security /Brian J. Foley -- Security Multilateralism: Progress and Paradox /Margaret E. McGuinness -- Legality versus Legitimacy and the Use of Force /Petr Válek -- The Phantom of the Neo-Global Era: International Law and the Implications of Non-State Terrorism on the Nexus of Self-Defense and the Use of Force /L. Waldron Davis.

AbstractArbitration as a dispute settlement mechanism is gaining popularity due to various factors such as its consensual nature and flexibility as compared to court proceedings. Independency of arbitration as an adjudication mechanism has enhanced and distanced it from the involvement of national courts. However, there may be times when parties may seek intervention of courts to secure interim or conservatory measures till final award in rendered. This article discusses whether an emergency arbitrator is a proper arbitrator who renders enforceable decisions and whether the provisional measures so granted should be construed as final award or not.

Nowadays, arbitration has been receiving much attention. Such attention can be manifested through enacting national legislations and international agreements to regulate it. Such legislations and agreements address the way of choosing arbitrators and the conditions of obtaining membership in the arbitration body. The judicial control is enforced on the arbitration process, because the judiciary is considered the one that has jurisdiction over the settlement of disputes. Such control is enforced to ensure that the arbitral awards are unbiased and impartial. It’s enforced to reach a sound arbitral award that is free from faults. It’s enforced to ensure that nothing shall affect the formation of the arbitration body and its arbitral award.

The present study aimed to explore the extent of control enforced by judiciary on the appointment and dismissal of arbitrators and the consideration of the assignment of arbitrators as void. It aimed to identify the extent and limits of this control. Thus, it aimed to identify the way in which the Jordanian legislator regulated these matters. The researchers of the present study adopted an analytical approach to analyze the legislative texts listed in the Jordanian arbitration act and the comparative acts. They also analyzed the relevant judgments issued by the Jordanian court of cassation.