A case of shared consciousness
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 199, Heft 1-2, S. 1019-1037
ISSN: 1573-0964
2107480 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 199, Heft 1-2, S. 1019-1037
ISSN: 1573-0964
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 198, Heft 11, S. 10765-10792
ISSN: 1573-0964
In: International journal for educational and vocational guidance, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 145-159
ISSN: 1573-1782
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 198, Heft 11, S. 10661-10684
ISSN: 1573-0964
AbstractDiscrimination is a central epistemic capacity but typically, theories of discrimination only use discrimination as a vehicle for analyzing knowledge. This paper aims at developing a self-contained theory of discrimination. Internalist theories of discrimination fail since there is no compelling correlation between discriminatory capacities and experiences. Moreover, statistical reliabilist theories are also flawed. Only a modal theory of discrimination is promising. Versions of sensitivity and adherence that take particular alternatives into account provide necessary and sufficient conditions on discrimination. Safety in contrast is not sufficient for discrimination as there are cases of safety that are clearly instances of discrimination failure. The developed account of discrimination between objects will be extended to discrimination between kinds and between types.
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 199, Heft 1-2, S. 949-973
ISSN: 1573-0964
AbstractExplanationist accounts of rational legal proof view trials as a competition between explanations. Such accounts are often criticized for being underdeveloped. One question in need of further attention is when guilt is proven beyond a reasonable doubt (BARD) in criminal trials. This article defends an inference to the best explanation (IBE)-based approach on which guilt is only established BARD if (1) the best guilt explanation in a case is substantially more plausible than any innocence explanation, and (2) there is no good reason to presume that we have overlooked evidence or alternative explanations that could realistically have exonerated the defendant. This is a comparative account, which I argue is better suited for arriving at accurate verdicts than the non-comparative 'no plausible alternative' account that many explanationists tacitly assume. Furthermore, this account is not susceptible to the most important arguments against IBE in criminal trials or to arguments against other, non-explanationist interpretations of the BARD standard. I use a case study to illustrate how this account provides meaningful guidance for decision makers in criminal trials.
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 199, Heft 1-2, S. 905-925
ISSN: 1573-0964
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 198, Heft 10, S. 9941-9961
ISSN: 1573-0964
In: International politics: a journal of transnational issues and global problems, Band 57, Heft 6, S. 990-1011
ISSN: 1740-3898
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 198, Heft 11, S. 10611-10641
ISSN: 1573-0964
AbstractThe intuitive Variety of Evidence Thesis states that, ceteris paribus, more varied evidence for a hypothesis confirms it more strongly than less varied evidence. Recent Bayesian analyses have raised serious doubts in its validity. Claveau suggests the existence of a novel type of counter-example to this thesis: a gradual increase in source independence can lead to a decrease in hypothesis confirmation. I show that Claveau's measure of gradual source independence suffers from two unsuspected types of inconsistencies. I hence put forward a more natural measure of gradual source independence which is not plagued by inconsistencies. Claveau's counter-examples to the variety of evidence thesis disappear with the measure I suggest. I hence argue that my measure is preferable and that this thesis does at least not seem to be troubled by Claveau's arguments.
In: Review of international studies: RIS, Band 46, Heft 4, S. 456-476
ISSN: 1469-9044
AbstractThis article aims to uncover the socially constructed normative foundation for the alternative East Asian economic development paradigm to neoliberalism in the context of civilisational politics. The question I seek to address is why East Asian states make value claims when promoting their alternative method of economic development. In addressing this question, I make two interrelated arguments. First, I argue that the politics of Asian values can be understood as another case of non-Western society's struggle to demonstrate multiple paths to modernity. Second, on a deeper level, I show that the discourse and narratives on Asian values is part of civilisation politics aimed to recalibrate the place of East Asia in a world consisting of the civilised and the uncivilised, a divide that still remains today in various forms following European expansion in the nineteenth century. In so doing, I shed light on the performative power of 'the standard of civilisation', which naturalises the temporal and sequential hierarchy of civilisational identities in world politics. On the basis of this article's findings, I draw out implications of a recalibrated East Asia for the ideas of hierarchy and progress in world politics.
In: Policing and society: an international journal of research and policy, Band 31, Heft 7, S. 798-821
ISSN: 1477-2728
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 198, Heft S23, S. 5615-5624
ISSN: 1573-0964
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 199, Heft 1-2, S. 927-947
ISSN: 1573-0964
AbstractIn this paper, we develop a novel response to counterfactual scepticism, the thesis that most ordinary counterfactual claims are false. In the process we aim to shed light on the relationship between debates in the philosophy of science and debates concerning the semantics and pragmatics of counterfactuals. We argue that science is concerned with many domains of inquiry, each with its own characteristic entities and regularities; moreover, statements of scientific law often include an implicit ceteris paribus clause that restricts the scope of the associated regularity to circumstances that are 'fitting' to the domain in question. This observation reveals a way of responding to scepticism while, at the same time, doing justice both to the role of counterfactuals in science and to the complexities inherent in ordinary counterfactual discourse and reasoning.
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 198, Heft 11, S. 10685-10708
ISSN: 1573-0964
AbstractThe role of the body in cognition is acknowledged across a variety of disciplines, even if the precise nature and scope of that contribution remain contentious. As a result, most philosophers working on embodiment—e.g. those in embodied cognition, enactivism, and '4e' cognition—interact with the life sciences as part of their interdisciplinary agenda. Despite this, a detailed engagement with emerging findings in epigenetics and post-genomic biology has been missing from proponents of this embodied turn. Surveying this research provides an opportunity to rethink the relationship between embodiment and genetics, and we argue that the balance of current epigenetic research favours the extension of an enactivist approach to mind and life, rather than the extended functionalist view of embodied cognition associated with Andy Clark and Mike Wheeler, which is more substrate neutral.
In: Review of international studies: RIS, Band 46, Heft 5, S. 594-612
ISSN: 1469-9044
AbstractWhile the last few decades of political economic history give the impression that the logic of neoliberalism is inexorable, this article argues that once we look further backwards and dig into recently declassified archives documenting the early days of neoliberal theory and practice, we find a messier picture. Economic policymakers in Thatcher and Reagan's administrations in the early 1980s did not set out to 'fail forwards' by generating a crisis that would enable a statist kind of neoliberalism. The key ideas that they drew on and the policies that they used to put them into practice sought to transform the economy indirectly, through a set of performative policy devices that they believed would generate a dramatic shift in people's inflationary expectations, lowering inflation without provoking a major recession. Archival records make it clear that these efforts were not only a failure, but also one that policymakers were acutely aware of at the time. By examining these quiet failures in economic policy, we can better understand how these governments simultaneously failed in their early efforts to introduce neoliberal economics and yet ultimately succeeded in transforming their economies in important respects – and in legitimising those transformations by narrating failure as a kind of inevitable success.