Suchergebnisse

Willams, David: Aid and sovereignty: quasi-states and the international financial institutions. In: Review of International Studies (Cambridge), 26 (2000) 4. - S. 557-573

Scope of application of the Convention -- Combined transport -- Carrier's liability for third parties -- Documentation -- The performance of the carriage -- Liability of the carrier -- Delay, non-delivery and cash on delivery -- Dangerous goods -- Compensation -- Claims and actions -- Successive carriage -- Derogation from the convention

The growing body of literature on hierarchy in international relations has overlooked instances of contemporary imperial governance. These imperial arrangements constitute a strong test of rationalist contractual theories of hierarchy. They support the contention that some polities will eschew sovereign prerogatives, or even renounce sovereignty altogether. Contrary to historical instances of empire, current dependencies receive prominent material benefits from the continuation of their relationship with the metropole. But the failure of the metropoles to obtain equivalent benefits shows why contractual scholarship on hierarchy is incomplete in failing to incorporate logics of appropriateness. Thus the primary theoretical goal of the article is to show that such scholarship is right in claiming that there is more to the international system than just sovereign-like units under anarchy, but also that it is too narrow in seeking to explain all instances of hierarchy as mutually beneficial bargains. Evidence is taken from fieldwork and interviews in dependencies of the Netherlands, Denmark and New Zealand.

Abstract
This article explores the development of Australia's policy approach towards communicable disease, both domestically and internationally. Drawing on archival records, it considers the methods used by federal and state governments to manage disease in Australia over time, analysing the key beliefs and priorities held by successive governments, and how these reflect Australia's particular character and history. Against these domestic concerns, the article interrogates Australia's approach to global health governance, with a particular focus on the state's contributions to the drafting of major international health instruments on communicable disease.
This analysis reveals the idiosyncratic nature of Australia's health policy and the resulting impact on Australia's contributions to the international legal system. It shows that Australia's approach has consistently relied on the creation and preservation of an impermeable national border. This policy reflects an institutionalised belief, held continually since the early colonial period, that disease must be fully eradicated, and that this is best effected through taking advantage of the country's geographic isolation. Domestically, this conception of disease control results in the adoption of strict quarantine requirements, immigration restrictions and broad discretionary powers regarding the entry of people and goods, while in the international context, Australia supports norms that facilitate its reification of its border.
Accordingly, the article contextualises Australia's health policy across four time periods of global health governance: the first sanitary conferences of the 19th and early-20th centuries, the post-World War II creation of the World Health Organization, the International Health Regulations 2005 revision project, and those Regulations' operation before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. This article's findings reveal the intrinsic connection between the unique domestic concerns of states and their approaches to international negotiations, which stymies the ability to generate effective cooperation globally. It clarifies this relationship and invites reflection on the resulting obstacles to international law's progressive development.